Qualification and Case Studies Subsea Chemical Storage and Injection Unit

A. J. Schroeder, J. Chitwood, M. York, Ben Alexander, Todd Holtz
{"title":"Qualification and Case Studies Subsea Chemical Storage and Injection Unit","authors":"A. J. Schroeder, J. Chitwood, M. York, Ben Alexander, Todd Holtz","doi":"10.4043/29307-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper summarizes results and lessons learned from qualification of a full scale subsea chemical storage and injection system. It also presents compelling findings from case studies that demonstrate the system can deliver significant savings compared to host platform chemical storage and umbilical delivery. Successful deployment of this new technology will initially provide, in brownfield applications, a very attractive alternative to an umbilical replacement, particularly later in field life when production rates and percent oil tend to be much lower, where economics may all together preclude installing a new umbilical and result in pre-mature field abandonment. The need for umbilical replacement might be triggered by a number of situations such as umbilical tube plugging or damage, or changing production composition requiring additional/different chemical treatments. In greenfield applications remote chemical storage and injection will greatly facilitate development of hundreds of smaller deepwater resources and billions of barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) by enabling safe, cost-effective long distance tie-backs to existing infrastructure out of traditional reach of umbilicals. Current shallow water deployment case studies indicate that transferring chemical storage and injection equipment weight from host facility deck to subsea and eliminating the need for on-deck personnel to maintain equipment generates positive economics and help achieve industry objects of ‘de-manning’ offshore facilities.","PeriodicalId":10948,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29307-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper summarizes results and lessons learned from qualification of a full scale subsea chemical storage and injection system. It also presents compelling findings from case studies that demonstrate the system can deliver significant savings compared to host platform chemical storage and umbilical delivery. Successful deployment of this new technology will initially provide, in brownfield applications, a very attractive alternative to an umbilical replacement, particularly later in field life when production rates and percent oil tend to be much lower, where economics may all together preclude installing a new umbilical and result in pre-mature field abandonment. The need for umbilical replacement might be triggered by a number of situations such as umbilical tube plugging or damage, or changing production composition requiring additional/different chemical treatments. In greenfield applications remote chemical storage and injection will greatly facilitate development of hundreds of smaller deepwater resources and billions of barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) by enabling safe, cost-effective long distance tie-backs to existing infrastructure out of traditional reach of umbilicals. Current shallow water deployment case studies indicate that transferring chemical storage and injection equipment weight from host facility deck to subsea and eliminating the need for on-deck personnel to maintain equipment generates positive economics and help achieve industry objects of ‘de-manning’ offshore facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海底化学储存和注入装置的资质和案例研究
本文总结了全尺寸海底化学品储存和注入系统的鉴定结果和经验教训。它还展示了令人信服的案例研究结果,表明与主平台化学储存和脐带输送相比,该系统可以显著节省成本。这项新技术的成功应用将为棕地油田提供一个非常有吸引力的替代脐带缆的方案,特别是在油田生产后期,当产量和含油量都很低时,在经济上可能无法安装新的脐带缆,从而导致油田过早报废。更换脐带管的需求可能由多种情况触发,例如脐带管堵塞或损坏,或者需要额外/不同化学处理的生产成分变化。在绿地应用中,远程化学储存和注入将极大地促进数百个较小的深水资源和数十亿桶油当量(BOE)的开发,通过实现安全、经济高效的长距离回接到现有基础设施,而不是传统的脐带缆。目前的浅水部署案例研究表明,将化学储存和注入设备的重量从主机设施甲板转移到海底,消除了甲板上人员维护设备的需要,产生了积极的经济效益,有助于实现海上设施“不需要人员”的行业目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing the New INCOSE Systems Engineering Competency Framework Using an Evidence Based Approach for Oil and Gas Companies A Machine Learning Application for Field Planning Optimization of Well Start-Up Using Integrated Well and Electrical Submersible Pump Modeling The Subsea Sand Management Challenge – What to Do with the Sand? Systems Engineering Principles to Enable Supplier-Led Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1