The Production of Everyday Space for Workers: The New Village Movement in China, 1919–1936

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Positions-Asia Critique Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1215/10679847-9723659
Qiang Zhu
{"title":"The Production of Everyday Space for Workers: The New Village Movement in China, 1919–1936","authors":"Qiang Zhu","doi":"10.1215/10679847-9723659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The idea of a \"new village\" first emerged in the years 1919–20 and was widely discussed by Chinese intellectuals, who advocated for its humanitarian and social justice purposes and its goal of constructing a new society. This article focuses on the new village movement in China from 1919 to 1936, which was imagined and materialized by intellectuals, social reformers, and the Nationalist state in response to crises of capital accumulation, displacement of labor, and urbanization. New villages emerged as a worldwide sociopolitical response to exploitation and class antagonism — the worst effects of capital accumulation and the alienation of labor, under which the creation of everyday spaces for labor reproduction provided the key to constructing a new type of community for social transformation among migrant workers. Whereas the state and capital attempt to \"pulverize\" new villages into a manageable, calculable, and abstract grid, diverse social forces simultaneously attempt to create, defend, or extend spaces of social reproduction, everyday life, and grassroots control. Thus, the new village's anti-capitalism combined an eminently modern criticism of capitalism with the conservative recovery of an ideal rural community, in an attempt to overcome social inequality and the urban exploitation of the rural caused by capital accumulation.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"16 1","pages":"429 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-9723659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The idea of a "new village" first emerged in the years 1919–20 and was widely discussed by Chinese intellectuals, who advocated for its humanitarian and social justice purposes and its goal of constructing a new society. This article focuses on the new village movement in China from 1919 to 1936, which was imagined and materialized by intellectuals, social reformers, and the Nationalist state in response to crises of capital accumulation, displacement of labor, and urbanization. New villages emerged as a worldwide sociopolitical response to exploitation and class antagonism — the worst effects of capital accumulation and the alienation of labor, under which the creation of everyday spaces for labor reproduction provided the key to constructing a new type of community for social transformation among migrant workers. Whereas the state and capital attempt to "pulverize" new villages into a manageable, calculable, and abstract grid, diverse social forces simultaneously attempt to create, defend, or extend spaces of social reproduction, everyday life, and grassroots control. Thus, the new village's anti-capitalism combined an eminently modern criticism of capitalism with the conservative recovery of an ideal rural community, in an attempt to overcome social inequality and the urban exploitation of the rural caused by capital accumulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工人日常空间的生产:1919-1936年中国的新村运动
摘要:“新村”的概念最早出现于1919年至1920年,并在中国知识分子中得到广泛讨论,他们主张“新村”的人道主义和社会正义目的以及建设新社会的目标。本文关注1919年至1936年中国的新农村运动,它是由知识分子、社会改革家和国民政府想象和实现的,以应对资本积累、劳动力转移和城市化的危机。新村的出现是对剥削和阶级对抗——资本积累和劳动异化的最坏影响——的一种世界性的社会政治回应,在这种回应下,创造劳动再生产的日常空间为农民工社会转型提供了构建新型社区的关键。当国家和资本试图将新村庄“粉碎”成一个可管理的、可计算的、抽象的网格时,不同的社会力量同时试图创造、捍卫或扩展社会再生产、日常生活和基层控制的空间。因此,新农村的反资本主义结合了对资本主义的现代批判和对理想农村社区的保守恢复,试图克服资本积累导致的社会不平等和城市对农村的剥削。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Contributors Contributors Editor's Introduction: Aesthetics of the Uncanny Daizō Sakurai's Trans-Asian Tent Theater, Picun, and the Reenchantment of Urban Space How to Create a New Workers' Culture Together: An Interview with Wang Dezhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1