GIZAChain: e-Government Interoperability Zone Alignment, based on blockchain technology

M. El-Dosuky, G. El-adl
{"title":"GIZAChain: e-Government Interoperability Zone Alignment, based on blockchain technology","authors":"M. El-Dosuky, G. El-adl","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27477v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-government provides access to services anytime anywhere. There are many e-Government frameworks already exist to integrate e-government services, but efficient full interoperability still a challenge.\n Interoperability per se can be modeled via four maturity stages, in which the interoperability zone is the holy grail of full interoperability to be reached ultimately with strategy alignment. As e-government services shift in the same way as e-commerce with value chain, this implicitly implies the possibility of benefiting from blockchain with e-government. Blockchain is a nascent promising architecture, whose transactions are permanent, verifiable, and recorded in a distributed ledger.\n This research article suggests applying blockchain in achieving e- government interoperability. Forms are juxtaposed on the outer borders of the system. These forms adopt those used by UK government, because they are standard as well as they are available for Python developers. Once a form has been completed, PySOA calls the requested service, before storing the data in Ontology Blockchain. After the service is performed, the policies are analyzed in batch processing using quantgov. A report is submitted to the central government periodically. Ontology Blockchain has a dual effect. On the one hand, it works as a secure data storage. On the other hand, it cooperates with PySOA in supporting both technology and semantic interoperability . The most important feature of the proposed method is the presence of (Government Interoperability Zone Alignment; GIZA), which acts as a backbone that coherently connects the internal subcomponents. This linkage is possible, because each form has an title, that corresponds to the appropriate service name. Each service in turn has a counterpart in the wallets stored in Ontology blockchain.\n To measure interoperability empirically, there is a need for metrics. This study adopts and quantizes a standard interoperability matrix along three dimensions of interoperability of Conceptual (Syntax& Semantics), Organizational (Responsibilities& Organization per se), and Technology (Platform& Communication). While concerns are : data, business, service, and process. Any deviation from the standard could contributes to the interoperability score (counting mismatches) or interoperability grade (counting absolute differences). An estimation is performed, for 1000 total random cases. It is estimated that the probability of getting a conceptual/technical interoperability score as large as the standard strategy score is (713 /1000 = 0.713 (2 in 3). It is estimated too that the probability of getting a organizational interoperability score as large as the standard strategy score is (712 /1000 = 0.712 (2 in 3). Then, Markov model is proposed to provide an accurate representation of the evolution of the strategies over time.","PeriodicalId":93040,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ preprints","volume":"9 1","pages":"e27477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ preprints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27477v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

E-government provides access to services anytime anywhere. There are many e-Government frameworks already exist to integrate e-government services, but efficient full interoperability still a challenge. Interoperability per se can be modeled via four maturity stages, in which the interoperability zone is the holy grail of full interoperability to be reached ultimately with strategy alignment. As e-government services shift in the same way as e-commerce with value chain, this implicitly implies the possibility of benefiting from blockchain with e-government. Blockchain is a nascent promising architecture, whose transactions are permanent, verifiable, and recorded in a distributed ledger. This research article suggests applying blockchain in achieving e- government interoperability. Forms are juxtaposed on the outer borders of the system. These forms adopt those used by UK government, because they are standard as well as they are available for Python developers. Once a form has been completed, PySOA calls the requested service, before storing the data in Ontology Blockchain. After the service is performed, the policies are analyzed in batch processing using quantgov. A report is submitted to the central government periodically. Ontology Blockchain has a dual effect. On the one hand, it works as a secure data storage. On the other hand, it cooperates with PySOA in supporting both technology and semantic interoperability . The most important feature of the proposed method is the presence of (Government Interoperability Zone Alignment; GIZA), which acts as a backbone that coherently connects the internal subcomponents. This linkage is possible, because each form has an title, that corresponds to the appropriate service name. Each service in turn has a counterpart in the wallets stored in Ontology blockchain. To measure interoperability empirically, there is a need for metrics. This study adopts and quantizes a standard interoperability matrix along three dimensions of interoperability of Conceptual (Syntax& Semantics), Organizational (Responsibilities& Organization per se), and Technology (Platform& Communication). While concerns are : data, business, service, and process. Any deviation from the standard could contributes to the interoperability score (counting mismatches) or interoperability grade (counting absolute differences). An estimation is performed, for 1000 total random cases. It is estimated that the probability of getting a conceptual/technical interoperability score as large as the standard strategy score is (713 /1000 = 0.713 (2 in 3). It is estimated too that the probability of getting a organizational interoperability score as large as the standard strategy score is (712 /1000 = 0.712 (2 in 3). Then, Markov model is proposed to provide an accurate representation of the evolution of the strategies over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GIZAChain:基于区块链技术的电子政务互操作性区域联盟
电子政务提供随时随地的服务。目前已经存在许多电子政务框架来集成电子政务服务,但有效的完全互操作性仍然是一个挑战。互操作性本身可以通过四个成熟阶段进行建模,在这些阶段中,互操作性区域是最终通过战略一致性达到完全互操作性的圣杯。由于电子政务服务与价值链电子商务的转变方式相同,这隐含着电子政务从区块链中受益的可能性。区块链是一种新兴的有前途的架构,其交易是永久的,可验证的,并记录在分布式分类账中。本文建议将区块链应用于实现电子政务互操作性。形式并置在系统的外部边界上。这些表格采用了英国政府使用的表格,因为它们是标准的,并且Python开发人员也可以使用它们。表单完成后,PySOA调用所请求的服务,然后将数据存储在Ontology Blockchain中。服务执行后,使用quantgov在批处理中分析策略。定期向中央政府提交报告。本体区块链具有双重作用。一方面,它可以作为安全的数据存储。另一方面,它在支持技术和语义互操作性方面与PySOA合作。该方法最重要的特征是政府互操作性区域对齐;GIZA),它作为一个骨干,连贯地连接内部子组件。这种链接是可能的,因为每个表单都有一个标题,对应于适当的服务名称。每个服务依次在存储在Ontology区块链中的钱包中有一个对应的服务。为了经验地度量互操作性,需要度量标准。本研究采用并量化了一个标准的互操作性矩阵,这三个维度是概念(语法和语义)、组织(责任和组织本身)和技术(平台和通信)的互操作性。而关注点是:数据、业务、服务和流程。任何对标准的偏离都可能导致互操作性得分(计算不匹配)或互操作性等级(计算绝对差异)。对总共1000个随机情况进行估计。估计的概率概念/技术的互操作性分数一样大的标准策略得分(713/1000 = 0.713(2,3)。据估计,组织互操作性得分的概率一样大的标准策略得分(712/1000 = 0.712(2 3)。然后,马尔可夫模型提出的发展策略提供一个准确的表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A framework for designing compassionate and ethical artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness Time series event correlation with DTW and Hierarchical Clustering methods Securing ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing protocol against the black hole DoS attack in MANETs 12 Grand Challenges in Single-Cell Data Science Mice tracking using the YOLO algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1