Comparing Carbon Intensity of Unconventional and Asia Pacific Oil Production

D. Meehan, Hassan M. El-Houjeiri, J. Rutherford
{"title":"Comparing Carbon Intensity of Unconventional and Asia Pacific Oil Production","authors":"D. Meehan, Hassan M. El-Houjeiri, J. Rutherford","doi":"10.2118/191921-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Carbon intensity (CI) of oil and gas production varies widely across global oil plays. Life cycle extraction from certain unconventional plays (e.g., tar sands) have the highest CIs but even many North American shale plays have high CI. Flaring and venting of associated or non-associated natural gas dramatically increases CI. This paper applies peer-reviewed processes across broad averages of shale activity in North America and compares them with CI in countries in the Asia Pacific region. Ways to lower the carbon intensity in both areas are discussed.\n We perform well-to-refinery calculations of CI for major unconventional oil plays in North America and conventional plays in Asia Pacific. This approach accounts for emissions from exploration, drilling, production, processing, and transportation. The analysis tool is an open-source engineering-based model called Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (OPGEE). OPGEE makes estimates of emissions accounting using up to 50 parameters for each modeled field. This model was developed at Stanford University. Data sources include government sources, technical papers, satellite observations, and commercial databases.\n Applied globally, OPGEE estimates show highest values in areas with extensive flaring of natural gas and very heavy crude oils - heavy oils require large energy inputs (e.g., steam flooding) and/or the use of light hydrocarbon diluents for transportation offset. A few other major areas included for reference. Examples illustrate how OPGEE can be used to evaluate the CI of public policy actions. A sensitivity analysis to flaring volumes illustrates these impacts, and further sensitivity analyses to pad drilling and improving well performance show CI impacts associated with hydraulic fracturing.\n Unconventional production, especially from light tight oil is the most significant new source of fossil fuels in the last decade. Under a wide variety of carbon constraints, oil usage will continue for many decades and increase in the near term. Operators, governments, and regulators need to be able to avoid \"locking in\" development of suboptimal resources and instead provide incentives for shale operators to manage resources sustainably. This approach provides quantitative measures of such actions. Oil producers must prepare by eliminating development of marginal projects, elimination of flaring and venting, optimizing hydraulic fracture treatments, using improved recovery methods (e.g., enhanced oil recovery using anthropogenic CO2), reducing energy use, and eliminating unnecessary gas waste.","PeriodicalId":11240,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 23, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191921-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon intensity (CI) of oil and gas production varies widely across global oil plays. Life cycle extraction from certain unconventional plays (e.g., tar sands) have the highest CIs but even many North American shale plays have high CI. Flaring and venting of associated or non-associated natural gas dramatically increases CI. This paper applies peer-reviewed processes across broad averages of shale activity in North America and compares them with CI in countries in the Asia Pacific region. Ways to lower the carbon intensity in both areas are discussed. We perform well-to-refinery calculations of CI for major unconventional oil plays in North America and conventional plays in Asia Pacific. This approach accounts for emissions from exploration, drilling, production, processing, and transportation. The analysis tool is an open-source engineering-based model called Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator (OPGEE). OPGEE makes estimates of emissions accounting using up to 50 parameters for each modeled field. This model was developed at Stanford University. Data sources include government sources, technical papers, satellite observations, and commercial databases. Applied globally, OPGEE estimates show highest values in areas with extensive flaring of natural gas and very heavy crude oils - heavy oils require large energy inputs (e.g., steam flooding) and/or the use of light hydrocarbon diluents for transportation offset. A few other major areas included for reference. Examples illustrate how OPGEE can be used to evaluate the CI of public policy actions. A sensitivity analysis to flaring volumes illustrates these impacts, and further sensitivity analyses to pad drilling and improving well performance show CI impacts associated with hydraulic fracturing. Unconventional production, especially from light tight oil is the most significant new source of fossil fuels in the last decade. Under a wide variety of carbon constraints, oil usage will continue for many decades and increase in the near term. Operators, governments, and regulators need to be able to avoid "locking in" development of suboptimal resources and instead provide incentives for shale operators to manage resources sustainably. This approach provides quantitative measures of such actions. Oil producers must prepare by eliminating development of marginal projects, elimination of flaring and venting, optimizing hydraulic fracture treatments, using improved recovery methods (e.g., enhanced oil recovery using anthropogenic CO2), reducing energy use, and eliminating unnecessary gas waste.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常规与亚太地区石油生产碳强度比较
油气生产的碳强度(CI)在全球各油区差异很大。某些非常规油藏(如油砂)的生命周期采掘具有最高的CI,但即使是许多北美页岩油藏也具有较高的CI。伴生或非伴生天然气的燃除和排放显著增加CI。本文将同行评议流程应用于北美页岩活动的广泛平均水平,并将其与亚太地区国家的CI进行了比较。讨论了在这两个地区降低碳强度的方法。我们对北美的主要非常规油区和亚太地区的常规油区进行了油井到炼油厂的CI计算。这种方法考虑了勘探、钻探、生产、加工和运输过程中的排放。该分析工具是一个基于工程的开源模型,称为石油生产温室气体排放估算器(OPGEE)。OPGEE使用多达50个参数对每个模拟场的排放核算进行估计。这个模型是斯坦福大学开发的。数据来源包括政府来源、技术论文、卫星观测和商业数据库。在全球范围内,OPGEE的估计显示,在天然气和重质原油大量燃烧的地区,其价值最高。重质原油需要大量的能源投入(例如蒸汽驱)和/或使用轻烃稀释剂进行运输补偿。其他几个主要领域包括供参考。举例说明如何使用OPGEE来评估公共政策行动的CI。对燃除量的敏感性分析说明了这些影响,进一步对垫块钻井和改善井性能的敏感性分析表明,CI影响与水力压裂有关。在过去十年中,非常规生产,特别是轻质致密油的生产是最重要的化石燃料新来源。在各种各样的碳限制下,石油的使用将持续几十年,并在短期内增加。运营商、政府和监管机构需要能够避免“锁定”次优资源的开发,而是为页岩油运营商提供可持续管理资源的激励。这种方法提供了这种行动的定量度量。石油生产商必须做好准备,取消边际项目的开发,取消燃除和排气,优化水力压裂处理,采用改进的采收率方法(例如,利用人为二氧化碳提高采收率),减少能源使用,消除不必要的天然气浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Investigation of Crude Oil Emulsion Stability: Effect of Oil and Brine Compositions, Asphaltene, Wax, Toluene-insolubles, Temperature, Shear-stress, and Water-cut Simple Numerical Simulations to Demonstrate Key Concepts Related to Coal Seam Gas Well Integrity The Lean Fluid Lifecycle: Optimizing Consumption and Waste in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Application of Novel Predictive Analytics for Data Allocation of Commingled Production in Smart Fields A Multiscale Study on The Onset of Sand Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1