4CPS-241 Impact of antibiotic prescribing in an emergency department on hospital stays, readmission and mortality

G. González Morcillo, B. Calderón Hernanz, M. Calderón Torres, ML Martín Fajardo, AC Mandilego García, L. Pérez de Amezaga Tomás, MM Parera Pascual, M. Vilanova Boltó
{"title":"4CPS-241 Impact of antibiotic prescribing in an emergency department on hospital stays, readmission and mortality","authors":"G. González Morcillo, B. Calderón Hernanz, M. Calderón Torres, ML Martín Fajardo, AC Mandilego García, L. Pérez de Amezaga Tomás, MM Parera Pascual, M. Vilanova Boltó","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Antibiotics are widely prescribed in the emergency department (ED). Around 30–60% of antibiotic prescriptions in the ED are inappropriate; this fact is associated with an increase in length of hospital stay and is a public health problem. In this context, the ED becomes a key point for antibiotic optimisation. Aim and objectives The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency and type of inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotic therapy (AT) in the ED and to assess the impact in terms of increase in hospital stay, readmissions and 30 day mortality after the event. Material and methods This was a descriptive, observational, retrospective, multidisciplinary study authorised by the hospital research commission. A cross sectional serial point prevalence study of all antibiotic prescriptions for patients under observation in the ED between January and March 2020 was conducted. The appropriateness of the prescription was evaluated by specialists from emergency medicine and clinical pharmacists, according to the centre’s infection guidelines (CIG). Demographic variables, comorbidity and site of infection were checked with the electronic medical record (HPHCIS V.3.8). SPSSV.23 software was used for data analysis with centralisation and frequency measurements for descriptive data and the χ2 test for inference. Results A total of 192 AT were administrated to a total of 168 patients (52% men), mean age 65 (SD 20) years and 68.5% had a Charlson index ≥2. The three main site of infection were respiratory (53%), urinary (19%) and intra-abdominal (12%). 39.6% of the antibiotic prescriptions were assessed as inappropriate. Inappropriateness was classified and distributed as: Unnecessary, no signs of infection: 3.3% of AT prescriptions Not active for the expected aetiology: 9.8% Appropriate, but wrongly dosed: 4% Appropriate, but not recommended according to the CIG: 22.8%. The indication with the highest degree of inappropriateness was urinary infections, with 19 of 31 AT prescriptions being inappropriate. Inappropriate prescription was not found to be a factor related to an increase in hospital stay (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.77 to 2.50; p=0.269), readmissions (OR 0.751; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.59; p=0.455) or mortality (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.87 to 22.86; p=0.809). Conclusion and relevance In general, CIG were followed because almost two-thirds of AT were appropriate. Furthermore, inappropriate AT prescriptions did not lead to an increase in hospital stays, or readmissions or mortality. The inappropriateness of the AT results may be considered for the development of antibiotic optimisation strategies. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Antibiotics are widely prescribed in the emergency department (ED). Around 30–60% of antibiotic prescriptions in the ED are inappropriate; this fact is associated with an increase in length of hospital stay and is a public health problem. In this context, the ED becomes a key point for antibiotic optimisation. Aim and objectives The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency and type of inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotic therapy (AT) in the ED and to assess the impact in terms of increase in hospital stay, readmissions and 30 day mortality after the event. Material and methods This was a descriptive, observational, retrospective, multidisciplinary study authorised by the hospital research commission. A cross sectional serial point prevalence study of all antibiotic prescriptions for patients under observation in the ED between January and March 2020 was conducted. The appropriateness of the prescription was evaluated by specialists from emergency medicine and clinical pharmacists, according to the centre’s infection guidelines (CIG). Demographic variables, comorbidity and site of infection were checked with the electronic medical record (HPHCIS V.3.8). SPSSV.23 software was used for data analysis with centralisation and frequency measurements for descriptive data and the χ2 test for inference. Results A total of 192 AT were administrated to a total of 168 patients (52% men), mean age 65 (SD 20) years and 68.5% had a Charlson index ≥2. The three main site of infection were respiratory (53%), urinary (19%) and intra-abdominal (12%). 39.6% of the antibiotic prescriptions were assessed as inappropriate. Inappropriateness was classified and distributed as: Unnecessary, no signs of infection: 3.3% of AT prescriptions Not active for the expected aetiology: 9.8% Appropriate, but wrongly dosed: 4% Appropriate, but not recommended according to the CIG: 22.8%. The indication with the highest degree of inappropriateness was urinary infections, with 19 of 31 AT prescriptions being inappropriate. Inappropriate prescription was not found to be a factor related to an increase in hospital stay (OR 1.39; 95% CI 0.77 to 2.50; p=0.269), readmissions (OR 0.751; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.59; p=0.455) or mortality (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.87 to 22.86; p=0.809). Conclusion and relevance In general, CIG were followed because almost two-thirds of AT were appropriate. Furthermore, inappropriate AT prescriptions did not lead to an increase in hospital stays, or readmissions or mortality. The inappropriateness of the AT results may be considered for the development of antibiotic optimisation strategies. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊抗生素处方对住院时间、再入院率和死亡率的影响
背景和重要性抗生素在急诊科被广泛使用。急诊科约有30-60%的抗生素处方是不恰当的;这一事实与住院时间的增加有关,是一个公共卫生问题。在这种情况下,ED成为抗生素优化的关键点。目的和目的本研究的目的是确定急诊科抗生素治疗(AT)不当处方的频率和类型,并评估其对住院时间、再入院率和事件发生后30天死亡率增加的影响。材料和方法这是一项由医院研究委员会授权的描述性、观察性、回顾性、多学科研究。对2020年1月至3月在急诊科观察的所有抗生素处方患者进行横断面连续点流行研究。根据该中心的感染指南(CIG),急诊医学专家和临床药剂师对处方的适当性进行了评估。用电子病历(HPHCIS V.3.8)检查人口统计学变量、合并症和感染部位。采用SPSSV.23软件进行数据分析,描述性数据采用集中和频率测量,推断采用χ2检验。结果168例患者共接受了192次AT治疗,其中男性占52%,平均年龄65岁(SD 20), Charlson指数≥2的患者占68.5%。三个主要感染部位为呼吸道(53%)、泌尿(19%)和腹腔(12%)。39.6%的抗生素处方被评估为不合适。不适宜性分类和分布为:不必要,无感染迹象:3.3%的AT处方对预期病因无效:9.8%适当,但剂量错误:4%适当,但根据CIG不推荐:22.8%。不适宜程度最高的适应症为泌尿系感染,31张AT处方中有19张不适宜。不适当的处方未被发现是与住院时间增加相关的因素(OR 1.39;95% CI 0.77 ~ 2.50;p=0.269),再入院率(OR 0.751;95% CI 0.35 ~ 1.59;p=0.455)或死亡率(or 1.40;95% CI 0.87 ~ 22.86;p = 0.809)。结论和相关性一般来说,CIG被遵循,因为几乎三分之二的AT是合适的。此外,不适当的AT处方不会导致住院时间、再入院率或死亡率的增加。AT结果的不适当性可以考虑抗生素优化策略的发展。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1