Differences between public and private sector pensions: an analysis based on career profile simulations

Q3 Social Sciences Economie et Statistique Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1903
P. Aubert, Corentin Plouhinec
{"title":"Differences between public and private sector pensions: an analysis based on career profile simulations","authors":"P. Aubert, Corentin Plouhinec","doi":"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] Following the alignment of the rules for private and public sector pension schemes, which began with the reform of the French pension system in 2003, there remain a number of differences. These include structural variations between the two schemes, the definition of the reference salary (salary over the best 25 years in the private sector or salary excluding bonuses over the final six months in the public sector). . We simulate the application of the two types of rules to several standard civil service careers. The impact on the replacement rate is not homogeneous : for the generation born in 1955 preparing to retire in 2017, applying private sector rules would be more beneficial for a standard category B civil servant, but less beneficial for a teacher, and slightly less beneficial for an “ A+” category manager. This is the result of the interplay of the factors that determine pension amounts with each type of rule : the proportion of bonuses in the total remuneration for civil service schemes (the higher this proportion, the lower the pension amount as a proportion of the final pay), the level and slope of the wage trajectory for private schemes (the more the slope is ascending and the greater the proportion of pay over the social security ceiling, the lower the pension as a proportion of the final pay). A change from one sector to another during a career can have a significant and varied impact on the replacement rate. It often leads to a lower replacement rate than would be achieved by remaining employed in either the public or the private sector throughout a career (for identical net salaries at all ages), but there are some configurations where a change of sector leads to a higher replacement rate : for example, the case of a category A+ civil service manager whose career finishes with around ten years in the private sector.","PeriodicalId":38830,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique","volume":"169 1","pages":"23-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[eng] Following the alignment of the rules for private and public sector pension schemes, which began with the reform of the French pension system in 2003, there remain a number of differences. These include structural variations between the two schemes, the definition of the reference salary (salary over the best 25 years in the private sector or salary excluding bonuses over the final six months in the public sector). . We simulate the application of the two types of rules to several standard civil service careers. The impact on the replacement rate is not homogeneous : for the generation born in 1955 preparing to retire in 2017, applying private sector rules would be more beneficial for a standard category B civil servant, but less beneficial for a teacher, and slightly less beneficial for an “ A+” category manager. This is the result of the interplay of the factors that determine pension amounts with each type of rule : the proportion of bonuses in the total remuneration for civil service schemes (the higher this proportion, the lower the pension amount as a proportion of the final pay), the level and slope of the wage trajectory for private schemes (the more the slope is ascending and the greater the proportion of pay over the social security ceiling, the lower the pension as a proportion of the final pay). A change from one sector to another during a career can have a significant and varied impact on the replacement rate. It often leads to a lower replacement rate than would be achieved by remaining employed in either the public or the private sector throughout a career (for identical net salaries at all ages), but there are some configurations where a change of sector leads to a higher replacement rate : for example, the case of a category A+ civil service manager whose career finishes with around ten years in the private sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共和私营部门养老金的差异:基于职业概况模拟的分析
自2003年法国养老金制度改革以来,私营部门和公共部门养老金计划的规则开始统一,但仍存在一些差异。其中包括两种方案之间的结构差异、参考工资(私营部门最好的25年的工资或公共部门最后6个月不包括奖金的工资)的定义。我们模拟了这两类规则在几个标准公务员职业中的应用。对替代率的影响是不均匀的:对于准备在2017年退休的1955年出生的一代人来说,适用私营部门的规则对标准B类公务员更有利,但对教师更不利,对“a +”类经理更不利。这是决定养恤金数额的因素与每种规则相互作用的结果:公务员计划的奖金占总薪酬的比例(该比例越高,养老金金额占最终薪酬的比例越低),私人计划的工资轨迹水平和斜率(斜率越高,薪酬超过社会保障上限的比例越大,养老金占最终薪酬的比例越低)。在职业生涯中从一个部门转到另一个部门会对替代率产生重大而多样的影响。与在整个职业生涯中一直在公共或私营部门工作(所有年龄的净工资相同)相比,这通常会导致较低的替代率,但在某些情况下,部门的变化会导致较高的替代率:例如,a +类公务员经理的职业生涯结束时在私营部门工作了大约十年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economie et Statistique
Economie et Statistique Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Health-Consumption Effects of Increasing Retirement Age Late in the Game Financial Support for Young Adults Through Tax and Social Transfers – Defamilialisation Scenarios Inequalities of Opportunity in the Use of Healthcare by Young Adults in France Young People’s Decisions in the Transition to Adulthood in France: The Influence of Family Factors The Links between Saving Rates, Income and Uncertainty: An Analysis based on the 2011 Household Budget Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1