Predicting atmospheric particle formation days by Bayesian classification of the time series features

M. A. Zaidan, V. Haapasilta, R. Relan, H. Junninen, P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, L. Laurson, A. Foster
{"title":"Predicting atmospheric particle formation days by Bayesian classification of the time series features","authors":"M. A. Zaidan, V. Haapasilta, R. Relan, H. Junninen, P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, L. Laurson, A. Foster","doi":"10.1080/16000889.2018.1530031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Atmospheric new-particle formation (NPF) is an important source of climatically relevant atmospheric aerosol particles. NPF can be directly observed by monitoring the time-evolution of ambient aerosol particle size distributions. From the measured distribution data, it is relatively straightforward to determine whether NPF took place or not on a given day. Due to the noisiness of the real-world ambient data, currently the most reliable way to classify measurement days into NPF event/non-event days is a manual visualization method. However, manual labor, with long multi-year time series, is extremely time-consuming and human subjectivity poses challenges for comparing the results of different data sets. These complications call for an automated classification process. This article presents a Bayesian neural network (BNN) classifier to classify event/non-event days of NPF using a manually generated database at the SMEAR II station in Hyytiälä, Finland. For the classification, a set of informative features are extracted exploiting the properties of multi-modal log normal distribution fitted to the aerosol particle concentration database and the properties of the time series representation of the data at different scales. The proposed method has a classification accuracy of 84.2 % for determining event/non-event days. In particular, the BNN method successfully predicts all event days when the growth and formation rate can be determined with a good confidence level (often labeled as class Ia days). Most misclassified days (with an accuracy of 75 %) are the event days of class II, where the determination of growth and formation rate are much more uncertain. Nevertheless, the results reported in this article using the new machine learning-based approach points towards the potential of these methods and suggest further exploration in this direction.","PeriodicalId":22320,"journal":{"name":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2018.1530031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric new-particle formation (NPF) is an important source of climatically relevant atmospheric aerosol particles. NPF can be directly observed by monitoring the time-evolution of ambient aerosol particle size distributions. From the measured distribution data, it is relatively straightforward to determine whether NPF took place or not on a given day. Due to the noisiness of the real-world ambient data, currently the most reliable way to classify measurement days into NPF event/non-event days is a manual visualization method. However, manual labor, with long multi-year time series, is extremely time-consuming and human subjectivity poses challenges for comparing the results of different data sets. These complications call for an automated classification process. This article presents a Bayesian neural network (BNN) classifier to classify event/non-event days of NPF using a manually generated database at the SMEAR II station in Hyytiälä, Finland. For the classification, a set of informative features are extracted exploiting the properties of multi-modal log normal distribution fitted to the aerosol particle concentration database and the properties of the time series representation of the data at different scales. The proposed method has a classification accuracy of 84.2 % for determining event/non-event days. In particular, the BNN method successfully predicts all event days when the growth and formation rate can be determined with a good confidence level (often labeled as class Ia days). Most misclassified days (with an accuracy of 75 %) are the event days of class II, where the determination of growth and formation rate are much more uncertain. Nevertheless, the results reported in this article using the new machine learning-based approach points towards the potential of these methods and suggest further exploration in this direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于时间序列特征的贝叶斯分类预测大气粒子形成日
大气新粒子形成(NPF)是与气候相关的大气气溶胶粒子的重要来源。通过监测大气气溶胶粒径分布的时间演变,可以直接观测到NPF。根据测量的分布数据,相对简单地确定某一天是否发生了NPF。由于真实环境数据的噪声,目前将测量日分类为NPF事件日/非事件日的最可靠方法是手动可视化方法。然而,对于多年时间序列的人工劳动,非常耗时,并且人为主观性对比较不同数据集的结果提出了挑战。这些复杂情况需要一个自动分类过程。本文介绍了一个贝叶斯神经网络(BNN)分类器,该分类器使用芬兰Hyytiälä的SMEAR II站手动生成的数据库对NPF的事件/非事件日进行分类。为了进行分类,利用气溶胶粒子浓度数据库拟合的多模态对数正态分布的性质和不同尺度下数据的时间序列表示的性质提取一组信息特征。该方法在确定事件日和非事件日方面的分类准确率为84.2%。特别是,BNN方法成功地预测了生长和形成速度可以以良好的置信度确定的所有事件日(通常标记为Ia类日)。大多数错误分类日(准确率为75%)是II类的事件日,其中生长和形成速度的确定更加不确定。然而,本文使用新的基于机器学习的方法报告的结果指出了这些方法的潜力,并建议在这个方向上进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Approach to Investigating the Relative Importance of Meteorological and Aerosol-Related Parameters in Determining Cloud Microphysical Properties Dimensionless Parameterizations of Air-Sea CO2 Gas Transfer Velocity on Surface Waves Transport of Mineral Dust Into the Arctic in Two Reanalysis Datasets of Atmospheric Composition The Climatic Role of Interactive Leaf Phenology in the Vegetation-Atmosphere System of Radiative-Convective Equilibrium Storm-Resolving Simulations Tropical and Boreal Forest – Atmosphere Interactions: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1