Method for in-field texture analysis of sugar beet roots using a handheld penetrometer

W. English, J. Ekelöf, F. Vancutsem, M. Leijdekkers, Gunnar Kleuker, C. Hoffmann
{"title":"Method for in-field texture analysis of sugar beet roots using a handheld penetrometer","authors":"W. English, J. Ekelöf, F. Vancutsem, M. Leijdekkers, Gunnar Kleuker, C. Hoffmann","doi":"10.1080/09064710.2022.2042589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Methodology for analysing textural properties of sugar beet roots in the laboratory has previously been established. It has been shown to be reliable and of value in exploring relationships between textural properties, damage rates, and storability of varieties. In this paper, a methodology for the assessment of textural properties in-field, prior to harvest, using an inexpensive handheld penetrometer is examined. Three sugar beet varieties were grown in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden during 2019. Textural properties were assessed in-field with the handheld penetrometer 2, 1 and 0 months prior to harvest, and with the laboratory penetrometer directly after harvest. Comparison of the results showed generally strong correlations. A power analysis suggests a difference in mean Handheld Pressure of 0.10 MPa could be found significant within a large trial with a block design. The reliability of the handheld penetrometer was further assessed in the Swedish national variety trials over three years (2019-2021). Correlation coefficients of 0.86 and 0.94 were found between mean Handheld Pressure for 2019 and 2020, and 2020 and 2021 respectively. The handheld penetrometer can be applied as an economic means of quantifying differences in textural properties of sugar beet varieties. Clear operating procedure and training must exist.","PeriodicalId":7094,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science","volume":"53 1","pages":"623 - 634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2022.2042589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Methodology for analysing textural properties of sugar beet roots in the laboratory has previously been established. It has been shown to be reliable and of value in exploring relationships between textural properties, damage rates, and storability of varieties. In this paper, a methodology for the assessment of textural properties in-field, prior to harvest, using an inexpensive handheld penetrometer is examined. Three sugar beet varieties were grown in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden during 2019. Textural properties were assessed in-field with the handheld penetrometer 2, 1 and 0 months prior to harvest, and with the laboratory penetrometer directly after harvest. Comparison of the results showed generally strong correlations. A power analysis suggests a difference in mean Handheld Pressure of 0.10 MPa could be found significant within a large trial with a block design. The reliability of the handheld penetrometer was further assessed in the Swedish national variety trials over three years (2019-2021). Correlation coefficients of 0.86 and 0.94 were found between mean Handheld Pressure for 2019 and 2020, and 2020 and 2021 respectively. The handheld penetrometer can be applied as an economic means of quantifying differences in textural properties of sugar beet varieties. Clear operating procedure and training must exist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用手持式渗透仪对甜菜根进行现场结构分析的方法
在实验室中分析甜菜根的结构特性的方法已经建立。它已被证明是可靠的和有价值的探索之间的质地性质,损害率和品种的可储存性的关系。在本文中,一种方法的评估纹理性质在现场,在收获之前,使用廉价的手持式穿透仪进行了检查。2019年,比利时、荷兰和瑞典种植了三种甜菜品种。在收获前2个月、1个月和0个月用手持式穿透仪在现场评估纹理特性,收获后直接用实验室穿透仪评估纹理特性。结果的比较显示出普遍很强的相关性。功率分析表明,在采用块设计的大型试验中,平均手持式压力0.10 MPa的差异是显著的。在为期三年(2019-2021年)的瑞典国家品种试验中,进一步评估了手持式贯入仪的可靠性。2019年和2020年、2020年和2021年的平均手持压力相关系数分别为0.86和0.94。手持式渗透仪可以作为一种经济的方法来量化甜菜品种的结构特性差异。必须有明确的操作程序和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The application of big data in the legal improvement of agricultural product quality and safety governance Research on the integrated development of leisure agriculture and red cultural tourism under the background of big data Contextualising smallholder organic agriculture in Zimbabwe and other sub-Saharan African countries: a review of challenges and opportunities Assessment of the spatial variability of selected soil chemical properties using geostatistical analysis in the north-western highlands of Ethiopia Integration of host resistance and fungicides reduced ascochyta blight pressure and minimised yield loss in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in southern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1