Beasts at School: Luther, Language and Education for the Advancement of Germanness

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Journal of Early Modern Christianity Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1515/JEMC-2019-2006
Jakub Koryl
{"title":"Beasts at School: Luther, Language and Education for the Advancement of Germanness","authors":"Jakub Koryl","doi":"10.1515/JEMC-2019-2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article aims at answering three complementary questions – why the implementation of the Lutheran idea of Christian renewal was possible by means of the German tongue alone; how the language can get beyond its merely communicative and descriptive purposes; and finally when can the performative analogy between speaking and being become essential for the language itself? Consequently, it discusses Luther’s concept of language as the primary vehicle for cultural change in terms of religion and confession, the socio-political agenda and national aspirations. Such a concept involved a great deal of theoretical considerations regarding pragmatic and most of all performative effectiveness of language, that altogether enabled Luther to provide his fellow-countrymen with a language which was culturally self-assertive, founded upon usage rather that abstract rules, and therefore understandable to common men, measurably affecting their way of being. For that reason Luther’s educational aims and his reform of divine worship, being the direct beneficiaries of that discovery, were taken into consideration, together with their social impact on the new cultural modes of comprehending the qualities that distinguish one community from another. Accordingly, the article discusses the language discovered by Luther (Hochdeutsch) as a cultural understructure having an effect on every feature that defines Lutheranism (and the Lutheran collective identity in particular) in respect of politics, religion, values and knowledge. For such a language, more than anything else, was able to take all the German peculiarities into account, and to make Germans finally capable of overcoming the spiritual and corporeal supremacy of the Roman Latin (lingua Romana). A closer insight given here into a pre-Lutheran period of that Roman-German cultural encounter leaves no doubt that Luther himself was often following the footsteps of fifteenth-century German humanists like Jakob Wimpfeling, Rudolph Agricola and Conrad Celtis. Although Germans “are and must remain beasts and stupid brutes,” as Luther declared, nonetheless language, by means of education, and divine worship could finally liberate those beasts from Roman-Latin standards, that is from a foreign way of speaking and being.","PeriodicalId":29688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEMC-2019-2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article aims at answering three complementary questions – why the implementation of the Lutheran idea of Christian renewal was possible by means of the German tongue alone; how the language can get beyond its merely communicative and descriptive purposes; and finally when can the performative analogy between speaking and being become essential for the language itself? Consequently, it discusses Luther’s concept of language as the primary vehicle for cultural change in terms of religion and confession, the socio-political agenda and national aspirations. Such a concept involved a great deal of theoretical considerations regarding pragmatic and most of all performative effectiveness of language, that altogether enabled Luther to provide his fellow-countrymen with a language which was culturally self-assertive, founded upon usage rather that abstract rules, and therefore understandable to common men, measurably affecting their way of being. For that reason Luther’s educational aims and his reform of divine worship, being the direct beneficiaries of that discovery, were taken into consideration, together with their social impact on the new cultural modes of comprehending the qualities that distinguish one community from another. Accordingly, the article discusses the language discovered by Luther (Hochdeutsch) as a cultural understructure having an effect on every feature that defines Lutheranism (and the Lutheran collective identity in particular) in respect of politics, religion, values and knowledge. For such a language, more than anything else, was able to take all the German peculiarities into account, and to make Germans finally capable of overcoming the spiritual and corporeal supremacy of the Roman Latin (lingua Romana). A closer insight given here into a pre-Lutheran period of that Roman-German cultural encounter leaves no doubt that Luther himself was often following the footsteps of fifteenth-century German humanists like Jakob Wimpfeling, Rudolph Agricola and Conrad Celtis. Although Germans “are and must remain beasts and stupid brutes,” as Luther declared, nonetheless language, by means of education, and divine worship could finally liberate those beasts from Roman-Latin standards, that is from a foreign way of speaking and being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《学校里的野兽:路德、德语的语言与教育》
摘要本文旨在回答三个相互补充的问题:为什么路德基督教复兴思想的实施仅通过德语是可能的;语言如何超越其仅仅是交际和描述的目的;最后,什么时候说话和存在之间的行为类比对语言本身至关重要?因此,它讨论了路德的语言概念,即在宗教和忏悔、社会政治议程和国家愿望方面,语言是文化变革的主要载体。这样一个概念涉及到大量关于语言的实用主义和最重要的表演效果的理论考虑,这使路德能够为他的同胞提供一种文化上自信的语言,建立在用法而不是抽象规则的基础上,因此普通人可以理解,极大地影响了他们的生存方式。出于这个原因,路德的教育目标和他对神崇拜的改革,作为这一发现的直接受益者,被考虑在内,连同他们对理解区分一个社区与另一个社区的品质的新文化模式的社会影响。因此,本文讨论了路德发现的语言作为一种文化基础结构,在政治、宗教、价值观和知识方面对定义路德主义(尤其是路德集体认同)的每一个特征都有影响。因为这样一种语言,最重要的是,能够考虑到日耳曼人的所有特点,并使日耳曼人最终能够克服罗马拉丁语(lingua Romana)在精神和肉体上的霸权。深入了解路德教会之前的罗马-德国文化碰撞时期,毫无疑问,路德本人经常追随15世纪德国人文主义者的脚步,如雅各布·温菲林、鲁道夫·阿格里科拉和康拉德·凯尔特斯。尽管如路德所言,德国人“是而且必须是野兽和愚蠢的野兽”,但语言,通过教育和对神的崇拜,最终可以将这些野兽从罗马-拉丁标准中解放出来,也就是说,从一种外国的说话和存在方式中解放出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Post-Tridentine Controversies at the Louvain Faculty of Theology: The Correspondence between Judocus Tiletanus and Michael Baius (1568) Critical Independence versus Christian Catholicity in Hugo Grotius’s Annotations on Matthew 23:2–3 True Worship in the Spirit: Martin Chemnitz and the Minor Role of the Body in Worship The Duke of Olyka and the Saint: The Meeting between Mikołaj Krzysztof Radziwiłł and Pope Pius V (1566) Hope from the Ashes: Juan Pérez de Pineda’s Mystical Body beyond Neoplatonic Consolation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1