The priority of using hypertonic saline over ventolin in the treatment of bronchiolitis

Kamalinia Mojtaba, Asadi Fardin, Kazemi Ali Naghi, K. Koorosh, Emami Elham
{"title":"The priority of using hypertonic saline over ventolin in the treatment of bronchiolitis","authors":"Kamalinia Mojtaba, Asadi Fardin, Kazemi Ali Naghi, K. Koorosh, Emami Elham","doi":"10.4103/2394-2010.193180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bronchiolitis is one of the important causes of hospitalizing infants in the hospital. Nebulized saline and/or ventolin are usually used in the treatment of this disease. This study aims to compare the effects of these two methods on the treatment of this disease. Materials and Methods: This cohort study was conducted on 67 hospitalized children ranging in age from 2 to 7 months with the diagnosis of bronchiolitis in Ayatollah Mousavi hospital in Zanjan City, from 2013 to 2014. In Group A; 33 patients received nebulized ventolin, and in Group B; 34 patients received nebulized 5% hypertonic saline. The two groups were compared in terms of the length of hospitalization and respiratory status, in the 3rd day of hospitalization. The data were described using SPSS software, according to the independent t-test. Results: In this study, the length of hospitalization was 4.2 days, on average, in the patients treated with ventolin, and 3.8 days in the patients treated with hypertonic saline. The patients treated with hypertonic saline had a lower respiratory rate and retraction, on the 3rd day, than the patients treated with ventolin. These differences are not statistically significant either. Conclusion: In this study, the patients in the hypertonic saline group have benefited a little more, in terms of the improvement of clinical symptoms and reduction in the length of hospitalization. Although these differences are not statistically significant, but considering the fact that hypertonic saline is cheaper and more accessible than ventolin, and unlike ventolin, the remaining of the hypertonic saline vial can be re-used, thus the use of hypertonic saline has priority over ventolin.","PeriodicalId":16068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","volume":"28 1","pages":"98 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-2010.193180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bronchiolitis is one of the important causes of hospitalizing infants in the hospital. Nebulized saline and/or ventolin are usually used in the treatment of this disease. This study aims to compare the effects of these two methods on the treatment of this disease. Materials and Methods: This cohort study was conducted on 67 hospitalized children ranging in age from 2 to 7 months with the diagnosis of bronchiolitis in Ayatollah Mousavi hospital in Zanjan City, from 2013 to 2014. In Group A; 33 patients received nebulized ventolin, and in Group B; 34 patients received nebulized 5% hypertonic saline. The two groups were compared in terms of the length of hospitalization and respiratory status, in the 3rd day of hospitalization. The data were described using SPSS software, according to the independent t-test. Results: In this study, the length of hospitalization was 4.2 days, on average, in the patients treated with ventolin, and 3.8 days in the patients treated with hypertonic saline. The patients treated with hypertonic saline had a lower respiratory rate and retraction, on the 3rd day, than the patients treated with ventolin. These differences are not statistically significant either. Conclusion: In this study, the patients in the hypertonic saline group have benefited a little more, in terms of the improvement of clinical symptoms and reduction in the length of hospitalization. Although these differences are not statistically significant, but considering the fact that hypertonic saline is cheaper and more accessible than ventolin, and unlike ventolin, the remaining of the hypertonic saline vial can be re-used, thus the use of hypertonic saline has priority over ventolin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在治疗细支气管炎中,高渗生理盐水优于呼吸素
毛细支气管炎是婴幼儿住院的重要原因之一。在治疗这种疾病时通常使用喷雾生理盐水和/或呼吸素。本研究旨在比较两种方法治疗本病的效果。材料与方法:本队列研究纳入2013 - 2014年赞让市阿亚图拉穆萨维医院67例诊断为毛细支气管炎的住院儿童,年龄在2 - 7个月。A组;33例患者接受雾化呼吸素治疗,B组;34例患者接受5%高渗盐水雾化治疗。比较两组患者住院时间和住院第3天呼吸状况。数据采用SPSS软件进行描述,采用独立t检验。结果:本研究中,凡托林治疗组的平均住院时间为4.2天,高渗盐水治疗组的平均住院时间为3.8天。在第3天,高渗生理盐水治疗组的呼吸频率和呼吸回缩均低于ventolin治疗组。这些差异在统计上也不显著。结论:在本研究中,高渗盐水组患者在临床症状的改善和住院时间的缩短方面获益稍多。虽然这些差异在统计上并不显著,但考虑到高渗盐水比ventolin更便宜,更容易获得,并且与ventolin不同,高渗盐水瓶的剩余部分可以重复使用,因此高渗盐水的使用优先于ventolin。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease hospitalized with COVID-19: A single-center experience from Eastern India Biological plausibility of spirituality in public health The pH and titration values of commonly used beverages in Trinidad: A cross-sectional study A role of community nurses and challenges faced by them toward providing MCH services in selected blocks in West Bengal: A cross-sectional study Lifestyle changes during the Covid-19 lockdown among young adults in Kerala in terms of physical activity, sleeping habits, and perceived psychological problems: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1