Alzheimer’s Disease: The Intellectual Structure of Brazilian Research before and after the Implementation of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Scientometric Research Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI:10.5530/jscires.11.3.35
Angelina Pereira da Silva
{"title":"Alzheimer’s Disease: The Intellectual Structure of Brazilian Research before and after the Implementation of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities","authors":"Angelina Pereira da Silva","doi":"10.5530/jscires.11.3.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Alzheimer’s Disease, the most common type of dementia, affects mainly the elderly population and will grow significantly in the coming decades. Objectives: To investigate Brazilian scientific research on Alzheimer’s Disease before and after the implementation of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities. Methodology: A quantitative research study based on data from Brazilian scientific output on Alzheimer’s Disease collected from the Scopus database in 1974-2005 and 2006-2019. Scientometric methods were used, especially journal and author cocitation analysis. Results: The findings show a growth of original and review articles on Alzheimer’s Disease, published mainly in journals focused on health sciences and authored by researchers from institutions in the Southeast region. The analysis of co-citation journals revealed that Brazilian research on Alzheimer’s Disease, in the first period, was distributed on 72 titles focused on health sciences and, in the second period, 679 titles with broader field coverage. The co-citation authors initially revealed 93 authors co-cited in distant clusters and, in the second period, 1,000 authors co-cited in more connected clusters. Conclusion: Attention is drawn to the strong growth in the Brazilian production of Alzheimer’s Disease after the implementation of the Agenda, as well as to a change in the intellectual structure of research on Alzheimer’s Disease. It is supposed that the Agenda may have acted as a vital element not only for scientific production but also for the release of resources and the participation of researchers, both fundamental actors that would also explain the observed changes.","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientometric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer’s Disease, the most common type of dementia, affects mainly the elderly population and will grow significantly in the coming decades. Objectives: To investigate Brazilian scientific research on Alzheimer’s Disease before and after the implementation of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities. Methodology: A quantitative research study based on data from Brazilian scientific output on Alzheimer’s Disease collected from the Scopus database in 1974-2005 and 2006-2019. Scientometric methods were used, especially journal and author cocitation analysis. Results: The findings show a growth of original and review articles on Alzheimer’s Disease, published mainly in journals focused on health sciences and authored by researchers from institutions in the Southeast region. The analysis of co-citation journals revealed that Brazilian research on Alzheimer’s Disease, in the first period, was distributed on 72 titles focused on health sciences and, in the second period, 679 titles with broader field coverage. The co-citation authors initially revealed 93 authors co-cited in distant clusters and, in the second period, 1,000 authors co-cited in more connected clusters. Conclusion: Attention is drawn to the strong growth in the Brazilian production of Alzheimer’s Disease after the implementation of the Agenda, as well as to a change in the intellectual structure of research on Alzheimer’s Disease. It is supposed that the Agenda may have acted as a vital element not only for scientific production but also for the release of resources and the participation of researchers, both fundamental actors that would also explain the observed changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病:实施国家卫生研究优先议程前后巴西研究的知识结构
简介:阿尔茨海默病是最常见的痴呆症类型,主要影响老年人,并将在未来几十年显著增长。目的:调查巴西在实施国家卫生研究重点议程前后对阿尔茨海默病的科学研究情况。方法:基于1974-2005年和2006-2019年从Scopus数据库收集的巴西阿尔茨海默病科学产出数据的定量研究。采用科学计量学方法,特别是期刊和作者冥想分析。结果:研究结果显示,关于阿尔茨海默病的原创和评论文章有所增加,主要发表在健康科学期刊上,作者来自东南地区的研究机构。对共引期刊的分析表明,在第一个时期,巴西对阿尔茨海默病的研究集中在72个以健康科学为重点的标题上,在第二个时期,分布在679个具有更广泛领域覆盖的标题上。共被引作者最初显示有93位作者在较远的集群中被共被引,在第二阶段,有1000位作者在更紧密的集群中被共被引。结论:值得注意的是,在《议程》实施后,巴西阿尔茨海默病的产量出现了强劲增长,阿尔茨海默病研究的知识结构也发生了变化。人们认为,《议程》可能不仅对科学生产,而且对资源的释放和研究人员的参与都是至关重要的因素,这两种基本因素也可以解释所观察到的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Scientometric Research
Journal of Scientometric Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Publications on Environmental Innovation Exploring the Impact of Altmetrics in Relation to Citation Count and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Social Networking and Gender-Homophily in Article Publications: A Tale of Two Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) Nanotechnology in Food Production: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Using R-package How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1