Brain Death Scintigraphy using Tc-99m DTPA: Does Equivocal Cerebral Flow Matter?

Nishanta B. Baidya, Nishanta B. Baidya, A. G. Kolk, J. Medow, L. Hall, Ommega Internationals
{"title":"Brain Death Scintigraphy using Tc-99m DTPA: Does Equivocal Cerebral Flow Matter?","authors":"Nishanta B. Baidya, Nishanta B. Baidya, A. G. Kolk, J. Medow, L. Hall, Ommega Internationals","doi":"10.15436/2377-1348.20.2739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To eliminate the “equivocal flow” group from brain death scintigraphy with Tc-99m DTPA by demonstrating that patients with equivocal cerebral flow will eventually fall in the brain death groups who have no cerebral flow. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive cerebral perfusion studies requested for confirmation of brain death (100 patients) performed at the University of Wisconsin from October 2009 to December 2017. Two patients died before they could obtain the cerebral perfusion study and 4 patients had duplicate medical record numbers or perfusion studies, leaving a total of 94 evaluable patients. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: no cerebral flow present, equivocal cerebral flow present and cerebral flow present. Medical records were reviewed to determine if any patients with equivocal flow survived. Results: Of the 94 evaluable patients, 70 had no cerebral flow present, 16 had equivocal cerebral flow present and 8 had cerebral flow present. Ninety-three of 94 patients in all 3 groups were clinically declared brain dead by the neurointensivist team during the same hospital admission. Fifteen of 16 patients in the equivocal flow group were clinically declared brain dead within 48 hours of the brain death scintigraphic study. One patient with equivocal flow present had clinical care withdrawn and died prior to the completion of clinical brain death determination. There was no difference in the final outcome among the no flow and equivocal flow groups. Conclusions: All patients with equivocal flow died shortly after the cerebral perfusion study and thus the equivocal flow category and clinical uncertainty associated with it may be eliminated. Furthermore, given the lack of any false negative studies with Tc-99m DTPA, there may be no significant advantage to using the more expensive and logistically challenging cerebral perfusion agents Tc-99m HMPAO and Tc-99m ECD.","PeriodicalId":14163,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15436/2377-1348.20.2739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To eliminate the “equivocal flow” group from brain death scintigraphy with Tc-99m DTPA by demonstrating that patients with equivocal cerebral flow will eventually fall in the brain death groups who have no cerebral flow. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive cerebral perfusion studies requested for confirmation of brain death (100 patients) performed at the University of Wisconsin from October 2009 to December 2017. Two patients died before they could obtain the cerebral perfusion study and 4 patients had duplicate medical record numbers or perfusion studies, leaving a total of 94 evaluable patients. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: no cerebral flow present, equivocal cerebral flow present and cerebral flow present. Medical records were reviewed to determine if any patients with equivocal flow survived. Results: Of the 94 evaluable patients, 70 had no cerebral flow present, 16 had equivocal cerebral flow present and 8 had cerebral flow present. Ninety-three of 94 patients in all 3 groups were clinically declared brain dead by the neurointensivist team during the same hospital admission. Fifteen of 16 patients in the equivocal flow group were clinically declared brain dead within 48 hours of the brain death scintigraphic study. One patient with equivocal flow present had clinical care withdrawn and died prior to the completion of clinical brain death determination. There was no difference in the final outcome among the no flow and equivocal flow groups. Conclusions: All patients with equivocal flow died shortly after the cerebral perfusion study and thus the equivocal flow category and clinical uncertainty associated with it may be eliminated. Furthermore, given the lack of any false negative studies with Tc-99m DTPA, there may be no significant advantage to using the more expensive and logistically challenging cerebral perfusion agents Tc-99m HMPAO and Tc-99m ECD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tc-99m DTPA脑死亡显像:模棱两可的脑血流有关系吗?
目的:利用Tc-99m DTPA消除脑死亡显像中的“模棱两可脑流”组,证明有模棱两可脑流的患者最终会落入无脑流的脑死亡组。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2009年10月至2017年12月在威斯康星大学进行的100例连续脑灌注研究,以确认脑死亡(100例患者)。2例患者在获得脑灌注研究前死亡,4例患者有重复的病历编号或灌注研究,共94例可评估患者。将患者分为无脑流、有脑流和有脑流3组。检查医疗记录以确定是否有模棱两可血流的患者存活。结果:94例可评估患者中,70例无脑血流,16例有脑血流模糊,8例有脑血流。3组94例患者中93例在同一住院期间均被神经强化科临床宣告脑死亡。模棱两可血流组16例患者中有15例在脑死亡显像研究后48小时内被临床宣布脑死亡。一名存在模棱两可血流的患者在完成临床脑死亡确定之前停止了临床治疗并死亡。无血流组和模糊血流组的最终结果没有差异。结论:所有模糊性血流患者均在脑灌注研究后不久死亡,因此可以消除与之相关的模糊性血流类别和临床不确定性。此外,由于缺乏Tc-99m DTPA的假阴性研究,使用更昂贵且具有物流挑战性的脑灌注剂Tc-99m HMPAO和Tc-99m ECD可能没有显着优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of BDNF Genotype on the Effect of Neuromodulation on Pain Signalling and Pain Perception in Humans Multiple Mononeuropathy in Churg-Strauss Syndrome Presenting as a Subacute Ascending Polineuropathy: A Case Report Peripheral Neuropathies after Bariatric Surgery: A Current Review A Novel Automated Algorithm Effectively Titrates Stimulation in an Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device Migraines and CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies: A Review of Cardiovascular Side Effects and Safety Profile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1