Organisational culture in Romania: The fine line between success and failure for women in academia

Q3 Social Sciences Stanovnistvo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2298/stnv200218006i
George Ichim Marian
{"title":"Organisational culture in Romania: The fine line between success and failure for women in academia","authors":"George Ichim Marian","doi":"10.2298/stnv200218006i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiences of discrimination in the academic world discourage women from taking part in contests to occupy higher academic positions. People tend to evaluate academic management based on what they consider to be normal behaviour for both women and men. Because of this, women are often perceived as less appropriately equipped to occupy an academic managerial position than men, especially in fields (such as the academic field) where male stereotypes are regarded as more efficient. This research was intended to evaluate the organisational culture and environment within the largest university centres in Ia?i (Romania) in relation to the accomplishment and execution of academic and scientific tasks by academic staff, as well as measuring their personal and professional satisfaction. We used a qualitative method (the ?life story? interview), as we wanted to identify certain events and de-fining traits of women in academia by focusing on their subjective experiences. For this purpose, we took into account the following three indicators: professional motivation and satisfaction, balancing personal and professional life, and success and failure in the academic world. Focusing on the obstacles women meet in their attempt to reach scientific/academic management positions, we have noticed that one of the major difficulties women in the academic world are confronted with when becoming academic managers is creating a balance between family life and their career. The inter-viewed women are not willing to give up domestic tasks for the benefit of professional tasks, as they are part of the traditional family model. On the other hand, this study shows that these women do not lack motivation to take up a managerial position, but that the norms promoted in the academic environment disadvantage women, despite the fact that the interviewees consider these formal norms to be gender-neutral.","PeriodicalId":35694,"journal":{"name":"Stanovnistvo","volume":"55 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanovnistvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv200218006i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Experiences of discrimination in the academic world discourage women from taking part in contests to occupy higher academic positions. People tend to evaluate academic management based on what they consider to be normal behaviour for both women and men. Because of this, women are often perceived as less appropriately equipped to occupy an academic managerial position than men, especially in fields (such as the academic field) where male stereotypes are regarded as more efficient. This research was intended to evaluate the organisational culture and environment within the largest university centres in Ia?i (Romania) in relation to the accomplishment and execution of academic and scientific tasks by academic staff, as well as measuring their personal and professional satisfaction. We used a qualitative method (the ?life story? interview), as we wanted to identify certain events and de-fining traits of women in academia by focusing on their subjective experiences. For this purpose, we took into account the following three indicators: professional motivation and satisfaction, balancing personal and professional life, and success and failure in the academic world. Focusing on the obstacles women meet in their attempt to reach scientific/academic management positions, we have noticed that one of the major difficulties women in the academic world are confronted with when becoming academic managers is creating a balance between family life and their career. The inter-viewed women are not willing to give up domestic tasks for the benefit of professional tasks, as they are part of the traditional family model. On the other hand, this study shows that these women do not lack motivation to take up a managerial position, but that the norms promoted in the academic environment disadvantage women, despite the fact that the interviewees consider these formal norms to be gender-neutral.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚的组织文化:学术界女性成功与失败之间的微妙界限
学术界的歧视经历使妇女不愿参加争夺更高学术职位的竞赛。人们倾向于根据他们认为女性和男性的正常行为来评估学术管理。正因为如此,女性通常被认为比男性更不适合担任学术管理职位,特别是在男性被认为效率更高的领域(如学术领域)。本研究旨在评估意大利最大的大学中心的组织文化和环境。i(罗马尼亚)关于学术人员完成和执行学术和科学任务,以及衡量他们的个人和专业满意度。我们使用了一种定性的方法(生活故事?采访),因为我们想通过关注学术界女性的主观经历来确定某些事件和定义她们的特征。为此,我们考虑了以下三个指标:职业动机和满意度、个人与职业生活的平衡、学术领域的成功与失败。关注女性在试图达到科学/学术管理职位时遇到的障碍,我们注意到,学术界女性在成为学术管理人员时面临的主要困难之一是如何在家庭生活和事业之间取得平衡。受访女性不愿意为了工作而放弃家务,因为这是传统家庭模式的一部分。另一方面,本研究表明,这些女性并不缺乏担任管理职位的动机,但在学术环境中推广的规范对女性不利,尽管受访者认为这些正式规范是中性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stanovnistvo
Stanovnistvo Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is there communication? Access to information by persons with disabilities in Serbia Regulation of temporary agency work and the modern labor market: a case study of Slovenia Integrating advanced technologies for enhanced demographic research and urban planning Characteristics of the labor market in Croatia and contemporary external migration Uticaj migratornih kretanja na tržište rada u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1