PUFF-BY-PUFF DETERMINATION OF THE pH OF WATER-EXTRACTABLES FROM MAINSTREAM PARTICULATE PHASE AND WHOLE MAINSTREAM SMOKE OF REFERENCE AND COMMERCIAL CIGARETTES
C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt
{"title":"PUFF-BY-PUFF DETERMINATION OF THE pH OF WATER-EXTRACTABLES FROM MAINSTREAM PARTICULATE PHASE AND WHOLE MAINSTREAM SMOKE OF REFERENCE AND COMMERCIAL CIGARETTES","authors":"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt","doi":"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two methods used for a puff-by-puff determination of the pH of water-extractables of cigarette smoke were compared. Particulate and whole smoke data for Kentucky Reference Cigarettes 1R3F, 1R4F, and 1R5F and for a commercial cigarette brand were collected. Mainstream particulate for each puff was collected separately on glass-fiber filter pads. The pads were extracted with deionized water (particulate method) or deionized water purged with exhaust from the smoking machine (whole smoke method) and the pH was measured. Particulate-method pH was inversely related to the amount of particulate collected, allowing for true comparisons between individual puffs from the same cigarette and between cigarette types. The whole smoke method lacked the sensitivity to distinguish between samples and is of little use as a comparative tool, probably because of the large contribution of carbon dioxide.","PeriodicalId":10257,"journal":{"name":"中国烟草科学","volume":"1 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国烟草科学","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract Two methods used for a puff-by-puff determination of the pH of water-extractables of cigarette smoke were compared. Particulate and whole smoke data for Kentucky Reference Cigarettes 1R3F, 1R4F, and 1R5F and for a commercial cigarette brand were collected. Mainstream particulate for each puff was collected separately on glass-fiber filter pads. The pads were extracted with deionized water (particulate method) or deionized water purged with exhaust from the smoking machine (whole smoke method) and the pH was measured. Particulate-method pH was inversely related to the amount of particulate collected, allowing for true comparisons between individual puffs from the same cigarette and between cigarette types. The whole smoke method lacked the sensitivity to distinguish between samples and is of little use as a comparative tool, probably because of the large contribution of carbon dioxide.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Tobacco Science is an academic scientific journal (bimonthly) under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, and sponsored by the Tobacco Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Qingzhou Tobacco Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation. It was founded in 1979 and is publicly distributed nationwide. The journal mainly publishes academic papers on scientific research results, new production technologies, and modern management in my country's tobacco science research and tobacco production technology. In addition, it also publishes forward-looking review articles in the field of tobacco research. There are columns such as tobacco genetics and breeding, cultivation technology, modulation and processing, physiology and biochemistry, plant protection, review or monograph, quality chemistry, etc.