ENGLAND: DID THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTIN THE CASE OF JONES V KERNOTT CLARIFY THE LAWIN RELATION TO TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME?

Bartłomiej Orawiec
{"title":"ENGLAND: DID THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURTIN THE CASE OF JONES V KERNOTT CLARIFY THE LAWIN RELATION TO TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME?","authors":"Bartłomiej Orawiec","doi":"10.31743/recl.4313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dissertation will focus on common intention constructive trusts in relation to shared ownership of the family home predominantly in relation to unmarried couples. These trusts are particularly important because as opposed to married couples where the court may determine a couple’s financial and property issues upon divorce using the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the position of unmarried couples is not covered by any legislation and so judges need to refer back to case law and property law in order to establish the equitable ownership of property.","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":"96 1","pages":"85-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This dissertation will focus on common intention constructive trusts in relation to shared ownership of the family home predominantly in relation to unmarried couples. These trusts are particularly important because as opposed to married couples where the court may determine a couple’s financial and property issues upon divorce using the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the position of unmarried couples is not covered by any legislation and so judges need to refer back to case law and property law in order to establish the equitable ownership of property.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰:最高法院对琼斯诉克诺特案的判决是否澄清了与家庭住宅信托有关的法律?
本文将重点研究共同意图建设性信托与家庭房屋共同所有权的关系,主要是与未婚夫妇有关。这些信托特别重要,因为与已婚夫妇相反,法院可以根据《1973年婚姻诉讼法》的规定在离婚时确定一对夫妇的财务和财产问题,而未婚夫妇的地位不受任何立法的保护,因此法官需要参考判例法和财产法,以确定财产的公平所有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investing on the Polish Market of Condo-Hotels and Apart-Hotels – Selected Legal Issues Environmental Management of ISO 14001 System Enforcement in EU Countries Councillor Clubs in Communes in Poland and France Observance of Human Rights as an Element of Shaping the Position of the European Enterprise in the Knowledge-Based Economy Financial-Law Problems in Providing Free-of-Charge Legal Aid in Poland. Legal Comparative Aspects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1