Genetic predictors of destructive and constructive types of digital behavior among young people

I. Abakumova, P. Ermakov, E. Denisova, I. Kupriyanov
{"title":"Genetic predictors of destructive and constructive types of digital behavior among young people","authors":"I. Abakumova, P. Ermakov, E. Denisova, I. Kupriyanov","doi":"10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-3-101-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In the context of globalization, manifestations of extremism, negativism, aggression, asocial and dissocial behavior on the Internet tend to increase. However, biological determinants of destructive and constructive forms and transformations of users’ behavior are under debate.Intention – To study genetic predictors of digital behavior among young adults.Methodology. The study involved 115 people (51 males, 64 females) aged 18 to 22 years. In order to study the digital behavior, we used the author’s questionnaire “Strategies of digital behavior”. Molecular genetic analysis was performed through the DNA isolation from buccal epithelial cells. Statistical methods included comparative analysis, very simple structure method (VSS), principal component analysis, and ANOVA.Results and Discussion. It is shown that in most respondents active conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors prevail (45 %), active “destructive” and passive conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors are expressed almost equally (27 and 28 %, respectively). The active-destructive digital behavior is significantly more often observed in carriers of the combination of BDNF G/G, COMT G/A, and DRD2 T/T polymorphisms. For the constructive digital behaviors, neither biological determinants nor associations with the studied genes were observed.Conclusion. The above associations of COMT, BDNF, and DRD2 genes with the behavioral strategies of Internet users expand the existing knowledge about biological determinants of digital behavior.","PeriodicalId":36526,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Issues of Safety in Emergency Situations","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Issues of Safety in Emergency Situations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-3-101-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. In the context of globalization, manifestations of extremism, negativism, aggression, asocial and dissocial behavior on the Internet tend to increase. However, biological determinants of destructive and constructive forms and transformations of users’ behavior are under debate.Intention – To study genetic predictors of digital behavior among young adults.Methodology. The study involved 115 people (51 males, 64 females) aged 18 to 22 years. In order to study the digital behavior, we used the author’s questionnaire “Strategies of digital behavior”. Molecular genetic analysis was performed through the DNA isolation from buccal epithelial cells. Statistical methods included comparative analysis, very simple structure method (VSS), principal component analysis, and ANOVA.Results and Discussion. It is shown that in most respondents active conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors prevail (45 %), active “destructive” and passive conditionally “constructive” digital behaviors are expressed almost equally (27 and 28 %, respectively). The active-destructive digital behavior is significantly more often observed in carriers of the combination of BDNF G/G, COMT G/A, and DRD2 T/T polymorphisms. For the constructive digital behaviors, neither biological determinants nor associations with the studied genes were observed.Conclusion. The above associations of COMT, BDNF, and DRD2 genes with the behavioral strategies of Internet users expand the existing knowledge about biological determinants of digital behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻人破坏性和建设性数字行为的基因预测因素
的相关性。在全球化背景下,互联网上极端主义、消极主义、攻击性、反社会和反社会行为的表现有增加的趋势。然而,用户行为的破坏性和建设性形式和转变的生物学决定因素仍在争论中。目的:研究年轻人数字行为的遗传预测因素。方法。该研究涉及115名年龄在18至22岁之间的人(51名男性,64名女性)。为了研究数字行为,我们使用了作者的调查问卷“数字行为策略”。通过分离口腔上皮细胞DNA进行分子遗传学分析。统计方法包括比较分析、非常简单结构法(VSS)、主成分分析和方差分析。结果和讨论。研究表明,在大多数受访者中,主动的有条件的“建设性”数字行为普遍存在(45%),主动的“破坏性”和被动的有条件的“建设性”数字行为几乎相同(分别为27%和28%)。主动破坏性数字行为在BDNF G/G、COMT G/A和DRD2 T/T多态性组合的携带者中更为常见。对于建设性的数字行为,既没有观察到生物学决定因素,也没有观察到与所研究基因的关联。上述COMT、BDNF和DRD2基因与互联网用户行为策略的关联扩展了关于数字行为的生物学决定因素的现有知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Index of articles of journal “Medico-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations” 2022 Aspects of eliminating medical and sanitary consequences of the flood disaster in the Republic of Crimea on June 17–18, 2021 А case of mass vaccination against a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) at a large construction site Extensive traumatic detachment of soft tissue after accident: clinical experience of a multidisciplinary hospital Publicly available online course as a promising tool for teaching and promoting first aid skills in cardiac arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1