The comparison of mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and mitral annular systolic velocity (Sm) in determining subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

B. M. I. Saputra, I. Wibhuti, Luh Oliva Saraswati Suastika, N. Sari
{"title":"The comparison of mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and mitral annular systolic velocity (Sm) in determining subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus","authors":"B. M. I. Saputra, I. Wibhuti, Luh Oliva Saraswati Suastika, N. Sari","doi":"10.15562/ijbs.v16i2.414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an independent factor in increasing the risk of heart failure in the absence of coronary heart disease and hypertension. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) as the gold standard in determining subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is not available on all echocardiographic tools and requires good-quality images. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and mitral annular peak systolic velocity (Sm) are simpler, faster, and widely available method that can determine left ventricular systolic dysfunction regardless of image quality.\nMethods: This study involved 72 asymptomatic T2DM patients, divided into two groups, patients with subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (GLS >-18%) and normal systolic function (GLS ≤-18%). GLS was obtained from the mean of 18 left ventricular segments on the apical 4-chamber, 3-chamber and 2-chamber images. MAPSE was obtained on the septal and lateral sides of the mitral annulus using M-mode on apical 4-chamber view, while Sm was obtained using tissue doppler imaging (TDI).\nResults: The study included 72 asymptomatic T2DM patients, 34 samples (47.2%) were found with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, lateral TDI Sm had the highest area under the curve (AUC), it was 0.85, followed by average TDI Sm was 0.83 and average MAPSE was 0.81. The cut-off value of average TDI Sm <7.425 cm/s had the best sensitivity and specificity, 82.4% and 81.6%, while cut-off value of average MAPSE <13.4 mm had sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 73.7%.\nConclusion: TDI Sm had better accuracy than MAPSE in determining subclinical LV systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients. However, both of them can be used as alternative diagnostic methods of GLS.","PeriodicalId":55769,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/ijbs.v16i2.414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an independent factor in increasing the risk of heart failure in the absence of coronary heart disease and hypertension. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) as the gold standard in determining subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is not available on all echocardiographic tools and requires good-quality images. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and mitral annular peak systolic velocity (Sm) are simpler, faster, and widely available method that can determine left ventricular systolic dysfunction regardless of image quality. Methods: This study involved 72 asymptomatic T2DM patients, divided into two groups, patients with subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (GLS >-18%) and normal systolic function (GLS ≤-18%). GLS was obtained from the mean of 18 left ventricular segments on the apical 4-chamber, 3-chamber and 2-chamber images. MAPSE was obtained on the septal and lateral sides of the mitral annulus using M-mode on apical 4-chamber view, while Sm was obtained using tissue doppler imaging (TDI). Results: The study included 72 asymptomatic T2DM patients, 34 samples (47.2%) were found with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, lateral TDI Sm had the highest area under the curve (AUC), it was 0.85, followed by average TDI Sm was 0.83 and average MAPSE was 0.81. The cut-off value of average TDI Sm <7.425 cm/s had the best sensitivity and specificity, 82.4% and 81.6%, while cut-off value of average MAPSE <13.4 mm had sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 73.7%. Conclusion: TDI Sm had better accuracy than MAPSE in determining subclinical LV systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients. However, both of them can be used as alternative diagnostic methods of GLS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(MAPSE)和二尖瓣环收缩速度(Sm)在2型糖尿病患者亚临床左室收缩功能障碍诊断中的比较
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)是在没有冠心病和高血压的情况下增加心力衰竭风险的独立因素。全局纵向应变(GLS)作为确定亚临床左室(LV)收缩功能障碍的金标准并不是在所有超声心动图工具上都可用,需要高质量的图像。无论图像质量如何,二尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(MAPSE)和二尖瓣环峰值收缩速度(Sm)是一种更简单、更快、广泛应用的方法,可以确定左室收缩功能障碍。方法:本研究纳入72例无症状T2DM患者,分为亚临床左室收缩功能不全(GLS >-18%)和收缩功能正常(GLS≤-18%)两组。在心尖4室、3室和2室图像上取18个左室节段的平均GLS。在根尖4室视图上,采用m模式获得二尖瓣环的中隔和外侧的MAPSE,而组织多普勒成像(TDI)获得Sm。结果:本研究纳入72例无症状T2DM患者,其中34例(47.2%)存在亚临床左室收缩功能障碍。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,侧侧TDI Sm曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.85,其次为平均TDI Sm 0.83,平均MAPSE 0.81。平均TDI Sm <7.425 cm/s的临界值敏感性和特异性最高,分别为82.4%和81.6%;平均MAPSE <13.4 mm的临界值敏感性和特异性最高,分别为76.5%和73.7%。结论:TDI Sm诊断T2DM患者亚临床左室收缩功能障碍的准确性优于MAPSE。然而,这两种方法都可以作为GLS的替代诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Immune regulation in obesity: a narrative review Identification and quantification of Roseburia intestinalis and Escherichia coli in hypertensive patients in Denpasar Change of ABO blood group in a patient with Acute Myelocytic Leukemia (AML): a case report Cardiorenal Syndrome: revisiting its pathophysiology and classification The effectivity and safety of cisternostomy and decompressive craniectomy as management of brain trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1