{"title":"Determination method of smoke layer height in road tunnel fire","authors":"Jin Kaiyan, Li Zhisheng, Li Tao","doi":"10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buoyancy frequency methodꎬ N percentage methodꎬ integral ratio methodꎬ are three common methods to determine smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ the calculations of three methods are often biased from visual observations. In order to study and explain deviations of calculation results from visual observationsꎬ which were found in three common determination methods of smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ a long tunnel model was established based on FDSꎬ and six types of fire source power were set. Thenꎬ vertical visibility distribution was used to verify deviation between existing determination method and visual results before visibility mutation method was proposed. The results show that the deviation calculated from above four methods ranks as visibility mutation method (1 63%) < buoyancy frequency method (4 88%) < N percentage method (N= 30ꎬ 7 88%) < integral ratio method (8 50%)ꎬ among which results of integral ratio and buoyancy frequency method are higher than visual ones. It is also found that visibility value in vertical direction of tunnel remains constant and then decreases abruptly as the height increasesꎬ and the greater fire power isꎬ the faster it declinesꎬ and the lower visibility value there is.","PeriodicalId":9976,"journal":{"name":"中国安全科学学报","volume":"11 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国安全科学学报","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16265/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-3033.2020.04.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Buoyancy frequency methodꎬ N percentage methodꎬ integral ratio methodꎬ are three common methods to determine smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ the calculations of three methods are often biased from visual observations. In order to study and explain deviations of calculation results from visual observationsꎬ which were found in three common determination methods of smoke layer height in tunnel fireꎬ a long tunnel model was established based on FDSꎬ and six types of fire source power were set. Thenꎬ vertical visibility distribution was used to verify deviation between existing determination method and visual results before visibility mutation method was proposed. The results show that the deviation calculated from above four methods ranks as visibility mutation method (1 63%) < buoyancy frequency method (4 88%) < N percentage method (N= 30ꎬ 7 88%) < integral ratio method (8 50%)ꎬ among which results of integral ratio and buoyancy frequency method are higher than visual ones. It is also found that visibility value in vertical direction of tunnel remains constant and then decreases abruptly as the height increasesꎬ and the greater fire power isꎬ the faster it declinesꎬ and the lower visibility value there is.
期刊介绍:
China Safety Science Journal is administered by China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by China Occupational Safety and Health Association (formerly China Society of Science and Technology for Labor Protection). It was first published on January 20, 1991 and was approved for public distribution at home and abroad.
China Safety Science Journal (CN 11-2865/X ISSN 1003-3033 CODEN ZAKXAM) is a monthly magazine, 12 issues a year, large 16 folo, the domestic price of each book is 40.00 yuan, the annual price is 480.00 yuan. Mailing code 82-454.
Honors:
Scopus database includes journals in the field of safety science of high-quality scientific journals classification catalog T1 level
National Chinese core journals China Science and technology core journals CSCD journals
The United States "Chemical Abstracts" search included the United States "Cambridge Scientific Abstracts: Materials Information" search included