Health Insights: The Efficacy of Current Prenatal Education on Listeria Monocytogenes

Lindsay Fahnestock, M. Randhawa, Gagandeep Gill, Evangelista V. Shirley, Robin D. Smith, Jesse C. Bliss, Corwin Porter, S. Soret
{"title":"Health Insights: The Efficacy of Current Prenatal Education on Listeria Monocytogenes","authors":"Lindsay Fahnestock, M. Randhawa, Gagandeep Gill, Evangelista V. Shirley, Robin D. Smith, Jesse C. Bliss, Corwin Porter, S. Soret","doi":"10.5176/2251-3833_GHC14.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every year, at least one major Listeria monocytogenes (Listeria) outbreak occurs within the United States. If pregnant women are uninformed of possible ramifications of contracting Listeria, the mother and child are at risk for health complications. One possibly effective communication approach to this population regarding prevention and risk is through Listeria Educational Materials (LEM). In order to ascertain the status and effectiveness of currently available LEM for pregnant women, a systematic literature review was conducted. Literature searches were conducted using widely accepted public/private databases. The mesh terms used included “Listeria pregnancy”, “listeria education”, “Listeriosis”, “Listeria pregnancy prevalence” “Listeria monocytogenes”. Articles published within the past 10 years pertaining to educational materials for pregnant women were evaluated. Articles relating to general information of Listeria, were also narrowed to specific characteristics, traits, and origin for exposure. References to Listeria in elderly and immunocompromised individuals were excluded. Four studies involving Listeria interventions including LEM for pregnant women were identified. These studies all concluded a majority of pregnant women were still not provided with sufficient information on infection prevention of Listeria. Most educational materials provided to the women were in the form of pamphlets, and the majority of pregnant women who had heard of Listeria gathered the information through their own research efforts. The current evaluation of the available studies concludes there is inadequate emphasis placed on educational interventions for pregnant women regarding Listeria risk. These interventions concluded more must be done to inform these pregnant women of the dangers of Listeria as well as on the high-risk foods they consume on a daily basis.","PeriodicalId":91870,"journal":{"name":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-3833_GHC14.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every year, at least one major Listeria monocytogenes (Listeria) outbreak occurs within the United States. If pregnant women are uninformed of possible ramifications of contracting Listeria, the mother and child are at risk for health complications. One possibly effective communication approach to this population regarding prevention and risk is through Listeria Educational Materials (LEM). In order to ascertain the status and effectiveness of currently available LEM for pregnant women, a systematic literature review was conducted. Literature searches were conducted using widely accepted public/private databases. The mesh terms used included “Listeria pregnancy”, “listeria education”, “Listeriosis”, “Listeria pregnancy prevalence” “Listeria monocytogenes”. Articles published within the past 10 years pertaining to educational materials for pregnant women were evaluated. Articles relating to general information of Listeria, were also narrowed to specific characteristics, traits, and origin for exposure. References to Listeria in elderly and immunocompromised individuals were excluded. Four studies involving Listeria interventions including LEM for pregnant women were identified. These studies all concluded a majority of pregnant women were still not provided with sufficient information on infection prevention of Listeria. Most educational materials provided to the women were in the form of pamphlets, and the majority of pregnant women who had heard of Listeria gathered the information through their own research efforts. The current evaluation of the available studies concludes there is inadequate emphasis placed on educational interventions for pregnant women regarding Listeria risk. These interventions concluded more must be done to inform these pregnant women of the dangers of Listeria as well as on the high-risk foods they consume on a daily basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康洞察:当前产前教育对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的影响
每年,在美国至少发生一次主要的单核细胞增生李斯特菌(李斯特菌)爆发。如果孕妇不知道感染李斯特菌的可能后果,母亲和孩子就有出现健康并发症的风险。通过李斯特菌教育材料(LEM)向这一人群宣传预防和风险的一种可能有效的方法。为了明确目前可用于孕妇的LEM的现状和有效性,我们进行了系统的文献综述。文献检索使用广泛接受的公共/私人数据库进行。使用的网格术语包括“李斯特菌妊娠”、“李斯特菌教育”、“李斯特菌病”、“李斯特菌妊娠患病率”、“单核增生李斯特菌”。对过去10年内发表的有关孕妇教育材料的文章进行了评价。与李斯特菌的一般信息有关的文章也被缩小到特定的特征、特征和暴露的来源。排除了老年人和免疫功能低下个体中李斯特菌的文献。确定了四项涉及李斯特菌干预的研究,包括孕妇的LEM。这些研究都得出结论,大多数孕妇仍然没有获得关于李斯特菌感染预防的足够信息。提供给妇女的大多数教育材料是以小册子的形式,大多数听说过李斯特菌的孕妇通过自己的研究努力收集了这些信息。目前对现有研究的评价得出的结论是,对孕妇关于李斯特菌风险的教育干预重视不够。这些干预措施得出的结论是,必须做更多的工作来告知这些孕妇李斯特菌的危险以及她们每天食用的高风险食物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Surrogacy Morally Acceptable in Hong Kong? Coping Behaviors and Collaboration among Staff of Multiple Occupation Classifications during Norovirus Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with and without heart failure Management of Volunteer Activities Among Elderly Persons Compassion Fatigue among Healthcare Personnel in Acute Care Contexts: An Integrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1