Evaluation of Posaconazole for Primary Prophylaxis of IFI in Acute Myeloid Leukemia under Intensive Induction Chemotherapy. Comparative Real Life Study with Fluconazole in two Hematological Centers in Algeri

Mohamed Amine Bekadja, M. Michallet, B. Benzineb, N. Mesli, H. Ouldjeriouat, F. Serradj, M. Brahimi, N. Yafour
{"title":"Evaluation of Posaconazole for Primary Prophylaxis of IFI in Acute Myeloid Leukemia under Intensive Induction Chemotherapy. Comparative Real Life Study with Fluconazole in two Hematological Centers in Algeri","authors":"Mohamed Amine Bekadja, M. Michallet, B. Benzineb, N. Mesli, H. Ouldjeriouat, F. Serradj, M. Brahimi, N. Yafour","doi":"10.31557/apjcb.2021.6.4.249-254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis. The early consequences of induction chemotherapy are represented by pancytopenia with severe immunosuppression, which favors the emergence of so-called “opportunistic” infections and in particular invasive fungal infections (IFI) such as invasive aspergillosis (IA). This justifies the implementation of early, empirical, pre-emptive or prophylactic antifungal treatment. The objective of this study is the evaluation of a comparative study before and after the use of primary prevention with posaconazole versus fluconazole, in terms of incidence and mortality of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) during AML inductions, in real life in Algeria. Patients and methods: This study was performed in two periods in the 2 centers concerning the same AML patients receiving the same induction chemotherapy (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 for 7 days) but with a different type of hospitalization with common rooms for Tlemcen and protected single rooms for Oran. Period 1: The retrospective study was performed from 2014 to 2016 and involved 188 patients. 70 patients were hospitalized in a common room (Tlemcen) and 118 patients in a protected single room (Oran). All patients received as primary IFI prophylaxis fluconazole 400 mg/day. Period 2: The prospective study was conducted from April 2017 to September 2018 and involved 55 patients. Fourteen patients were hospitalized in Tlemcen and 41 patients in an Oran. These patients received posaconazole prophylaxis at a dose of 200 mgx3/day. The evaluation and comparison of descriptive and incidence data was performed using Chi2 statistical tests using SPSS version 19 software. Overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and were compared using the log-rank test with a significance level α of 0.05. Results: Period 1: The incidence rate of IFI: 34% at the Oran hospital versus 49% at the Tlemcen hospital (p=0.049). Among the 74 patients who presented with IFI, 39 (53%) died from IFI as the main cause of death, among these deaths, 16 (40%) were recorded at Oran and 23 (68%) at Tlemcen (p=0.011). Period 2: The IFI rate with fluconazole was 39% and that observed with posaconazole 22% (p=0.001) and the cumulative incidence was 39% at 21 days versus 10% at 15 days (p=0.046) with a highly significant decrease in IFI-related deaths: 53% versus 25% (p=0.004). Conclusion: This work has demonstrated the interest in terms of IFI incidence (17% versus 33%, p=0.04) and IFI-related mortality of posaconazole prophylaxis (25% versus 53%, p=0.004) used during AML in the context of hospitalization in common rooms. Furthermore, this work highlights that the combination of posaconazole prophylaxis and hospitalization in a protected single room allows an optimization of the management of this type of patients. \n  \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":8848,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcb.2021.6.4.249-254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis. The early consequences of induction chemotherapy are represented by pancytopenia with severe immunosuppression, which favors the emergence of so-called “opportunistic” infections and in particular invasive fungal infections (IFI) such as invasive aspergillosis (IA). This justifies the implementation of early, empirical, pre-emptive or prophylactic antifungal treatment. The objective of this study is the evaluation of a comparative study before and after the use of primary prevention with posaconazole versus fluconazole, in terms of incidence and mortality of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) during AML inductions, in real life in Algeria. Patients and methods: This study was performed in two periods in the 2 centers concerning the same AML patients receiving the same induction chemotherapy (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 for 7 days) but with a different type of hospitalization with common rooms for Tlemcen and protected single rooms for Oran. Period 1: The retrospective study was performed from 2014 to 2016 and involved 188 patients. 70 patients were hospitalized in a common room (Tlemcen) and 118 patients in a protected single room (Oran). All patients received as primary IFI prophylaxis fluconazole 400 mg/day. Period 2: The prospective study was conducted from April 2017 to September 2018 and involved 55 patients. Fourteen patients were hospitalized in Tlemcen and 41 patients in an Oran. These patients received posaconazole prophylaxis at a dose of 200 mgx3/day. The evaluation and comparison of descriptive and incidence data was performed using Chi2 statistical tests using SPSS version 19 software. Overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate and were compared using the log-rank test with a significance level α of 0.05. Results: Period 1: The incidence rate of IFI: 34% at the Oran hospital versus 49% at the Tlemcen hospital (p=0.049). Among the 74 patients who presented with IFI, 39 (53%) died from IFI as the main cause of death, among these deaths, 16 (40%) were recorded at Oran and 23 (68%) at Tlemcen (p=0.011). Period 2: The IFI rate with fluconazole was 39% and that observed with posaconazole 22% (p=0.001) and the cumulative incidence was 39% at 21 days versus 10% at 15 days (p=0.046) with a highly significant decrease in IFI-related deaths: 53% versus 25% (p=0.004). Conclusion: This work has demonstrated the interest in terms of IFI incidence (17% versus 33%, p=0.04) and IFI-related mortality of posaconazole prophylaxis (25% versus 53%, p=0.004) used during AML in the context of hospitalization in common rooms. Furthermore, this work highlights that the combination of posaconazole prophylaxis and hospitalization in a protected single room allows an optimization of the management of this type of patients.      
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泊沙康唑对急性髓系白血病强化诱导化疗下IFI一级预防的评价。氟康唑在阿尔及利亚两个血液学中心的比较研究
简介:急性髓性白血病(AML)是一种预后不良的血液系统恶性肿瘤。诱导化疗的早期后果表现为全细胞减少伴严重免疫抑制,这有利于出现所谓的“机会性”感染,特别是侵袭性真菌感染(IFI),如侵袭性曲霉病(IA)。这证明了早期、经验性、先发制人或预防性抗真菌治疗的实施是合理的。本研究的目的是评估在阿尔及利亚现实生活中使用泊沙康唑和氟康唑一级预防前后的AML诱导过程中侵袭性真菌感染(IFIs)的发病率和死亡率的比较研究。患者和方法:本研究在两个中心分两个阶段进行,涉及接受相同诱导化疗的同一AML患者(柔红霉素60mg /m2, 3天,阿糖胞苷100mg /m2, 7天),但住院类型不同,特莱麦森共用房间,奥兰保护单间。第一期:回顾性研究时间为2014 - 2016年,共188例患者。70名患者在公共病房(特莱姆森)住院,118名患者在受保护的单人病房(奥兰)住院。所有患者均接受氟康唑400mg /天作为初级IFI预防治疗。第二阶段:前瞻性研究于2017年4月至2018年9月进行,涉及55名患者。14名患者在特莱姆森住院,41名患者在奥兰住院。这些患者接受泊沙康唑预防治疗,剂量为200mgx3 /天。描述性和发生率资料的评价和比较采用SPSS 19版Chi2统计检验。总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan-Meier估计计算,采用log-rank检验比较,显著性水平α为0.05。结果:第一阶段:Oran医院的IFI发生率为34%,而Tlemcen医院为49% (p=0.049)。在74例出现IFI的患者中,39例(53%)死于IFI,这是主要死因,其中16例(40%)发生在Oran医院,23例(68%)发生在Tlemcen医院(p=0.011)。第2期:氟康唑组IFI发生率为39%,泊沙康唑组为22% (p=0.001), 21天累积发生率为39%,15天累积发生率为10% (p=0.046), IFI相关死亡率显著降低:53%,15天累积发生率为25% (p=0.004)。结论:这项研究表明,在普通病房住院的AML患者中,泊沙康唑预防治疗对IFI发病率(17%对33%,p=0.04)和IFI相关死亡率(25%对53%,p=0.004)的影响。此外,这项工作强调泊沙康唑预防和住院在一个受保护的单间可以优化这类患者的管理相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Properties and Cytotoxicity of Cisplatin-Loaded Nano-Polybutylcyanoacrylate on Breast Cancer Cells Rectal Polyp Prolapse: A Case Report Voided Urine Sample in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Serum PSA Ranging between 2.6 to 10 ng/mL Review on Automated Skin Cancer Detection Using Image Processing Techniques Oral Cancer at a Glance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1