THE DECLINING HEGEMONY OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE GROWING INFLUENCE OF CHINA: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE ON POWER TRANSITION THEORY IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Nasa’i Muhammad Gwadabe
{"title":"THE DECLINING HEGEMONY OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE GROWING INFLUENCE OF CHINA: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE ON POWER TRANSITION THEORY IN THE 21ST CENTURY","authors":"Nasa’i Muhammad Gwadabe","doi":"10.22456/2238-6912.102434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The apparent eroding in the hegemonic power of the United States and the sustained growth of China has triggered debate as to whether the rise of China will be peaceful or conflictual. Structural realism posits that the world is characterised by the anarchic ordering principle in which there is no central authority sitting above the states. Therefore, the absence of a “leviathan” on the international system automatically makes every state equal on the system which created an atmosphere of competition for the maximisation of power for survival. On a similar line of reasoning, the Power Transition theory as a variant theory within realism postulates that when the international system is structured based on the principle of hierarchy, peace will reign. It means that when international relations are regulated and influenced by a dominant power, the international system becomes stable. But the emergence of a dissatisfied powerful nation to challenge the hegemon usually ends up in war. Based on this assumption, Power Transition theorists argued that the rise of China to rival the dominance of the United States could not be peaceful. The Power Transition theory has influenced many academics to have the belief that the two nations will end up in “Thucydides’ Trap”. This belief has aggravated the matter beyond the reasonable level and has instilled panic in the mind of foreign policymakers which could jeopardise world peace and international cooperation. Hence, this paper aims to critically evaluate the deficiency of the Power Transition theory in the 21 st century in explaining the current United States-China relations and the prospect of peace or war between the two nations using process tracing. Accordingly, in this paper, it is argued that in the 21 st century, an armed confrontation between the United States and China is highly unlikely. Because in today’s world, nations (including the United States and China) are intertwined by the forces of globalisation which created inexorable economic interdependence. Additionally, there is rapid advancement in military technology and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction which came with the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). Consequently, there is a need to revisit the Power Transition theory to accommodate contemporary factors. The inclusion of the current variables into the Theory will make it applicable and adequately fit in the discourse of international relations and global politics of the 21 st -century international system.","PeriodicalId":37936,"journal":{"name":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.102434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The apparent eroding in the hegemonic power of the United States and the sustained growth of China has triggered debate as to whether the rise of China will be peaceful or conflictual. Structural realism posits that the world is characterised by the anarchic ordering principle in which there is no central authority sitting above the states. Therefore, the absence of a “leviathan” on the international system automatically makes every state equal on the system which created an atmosphere of competition for the maximisation of power for survival. On a similar line of reasoning, the Power Transition theory as a variant theory within realism postulates that when the international system is structured based on the principle of hierarchy, peace will reign. It means that when international relations are regulated and influenced by a dominant power, the international system becomes stable. But the emergence of a dissatisfied powerful nation to challenge the hegemon usually ends up in war. Based on this assumption, Power Transition theorists argued that the rise of China to rival the dominance of the United States could not be peaceful. The Power Transition theory has influenced many academics to have the belief that the two nations will end up in “Thucydides’ Trap”. This belief has aggravated the matter beyond the reasonable level and has instilled panic in the mind of foreign policymakers which could jeopardise world peace and international cooperation. Hence, this paper aims to critically evaluate the deficiency of the Power Transition theory in the 21 st century in explaining the current United States-China relations and the prospect of peace or war between the two nations using process tracing. Accordingly, in this paper, it is argued that in the 21 st century, an armed confrontation between the United States and China is highly unlikely. Because in today’s world, nations (including the United States and China) are intertwined by the forces of globalisation which created inexorable economic interdependence. Additionally, there is rapid advancement in military technology and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction which came with the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). Consequently, there is a need to revisit the Power Transition theory to accommodate contemporary factors. The inclusion of the current variables into the Theory will make it applicable and adequately fit in the discourse of international relations and global politics of the 21 st -century international system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国霸权的衰落与中国影响力的增长:21世纪权力转移理论的批判视角
美国霸权的明显侵蚀和中国的持续增长引发了关于中国崛起将是和平的还是冲突的辩论。结构现实主义认为,世界的特点是无政府秩序原则,在这种原则下,没有中央权威凌驾于国家之上。因此,国际体系中“利维坦”的缺失自动使每个国家在体系中平等,从而创造了一种为生存而最大化权力的竞争氛围。基于类似的推理,权力转移理论作为现实主义中的一种变体理论假定,当国际体系以等级原则为基础构建时,和平将占主导地位。它的意思是,当国际关系受到主导大国的调节和影响时,国际体系就会变得稳定。但是,一个不满的强国的出现挑战霸权,通常以战争告终。基于这一假设,权力转移理论家认为,中国崛起与美国的主导地位竞争不可能是和平的。权力转移理论影响了许多学者,使他们相信中美两国最终会陷入“修昔底德陷阱”。这种信念使问题恶化到超出合理的程度,并使外交政策制定者心中产生恐慌,这可能危及世界和平和国际合作。因此,本文旨在批判性地评价21世纪权力转移理论在解释当前中美关系以及两国之间和平或战争前景方面的不足。因此,本文认为,在21世纪,中美之间的武装对抗是极不可能的。因为在当今世界,各国(包括美国和中国)被全球化的力量交织在一起,全球化创造了不可阻挡的经济相互依存。此外,伴随着“相互保证毁灭”概念而来的军事技术的迅速发展和大规模毁灭性武器的扩散。因此,有必要重新审视权力转移理论,以适应当代因素。将当前的变量纳入该理论将使其适用并充分适应21世纪国际体系的国际关系和全球政治论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: AUSTRAL: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations was the first Brazilian journal in the area of International Relations to be fully published in English (2012). It is an essentially academic vehicle, linked to the Brazilian Centre of Strategy & International Relations (NERINT) and the Doctoral Program in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI) of the Faculty of Economics (FCE) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Its pluralist focus aims to contribute to the debate on the international political and economic order from the perspective of the developing world. The journal publishes original articles in the area of Strategy and International Relations, with special interest in issues related to developing countries and South-South Cooperation – its security problems; the political, economic and diplomatic developments of emerging countries; and their relations with the traditional powers. AUSTRAL is published semi-annually in English and Portuguese. The journal’s target audience consists of researchers, experts, diplomats, military personnel and graduate students of International Relations. The content of the journal consists of in-depth analytical articles written by experts (Professors and Doctors), focusing on each of the great continents of the South: Asia, Latin America and Africa. Thus, the debate and diffusion of knowledge produced in these regions is stimulated. All contributions submitted to AUSTRAL are subject to rigorous scientific evaluation.
期刊最新文献
FROM THE KAZAKHSTAN CRISIS TO SEE HOW RUSSIA INVOLVED IN GLOBAL SECURITY GOVERNANCE AS CONSEQUÊNCIAS DOS ATENTADOS DE 11 DE SETEMBRO DE 2001 PARA A ECONOMIA BRASILEIRA A COR DO GATO GEOPOLÍTICA NORTE-AMERICANA E CHINESA EM PERSPECTIVA COMPARADA CENTRO, PERIFERIA OU SEMIPERIFERIA NAS CADEIAS GLOBAIS DE VALOR? AS POSIÇÕES DO BRASIL E DA CHINA NA ECONOMIA-MUNDO CONTEMPORÂNEA (2005-2015) A RESOLUÇÃO DO CONFLITO ISRAELO-LIBANÊS PELO CONSELHO DE SEGURANÇA DA ONU (2006)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1