Sustainability Level of Heritage Cities in Malaysia

Y. Saleh, H. Mahat, M. Hashim, N. Nayan, Samsudin Suhaily, Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali
{"title":"Sustainability Level of Heritage Cities in Malaysia","authors":"Y. Saleh, H. Mahat, M. Hashim, N. Nayan, Samsudin Suhaily, Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali","doi":"10.23917/forgeo.v36i1.15287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to measure the level of sustainability of heritage cities in Malaysia. A thousand residents of ten selected heritage cities throughout Malaysia were selected as the respondents based on the cluster sampling and simple random methods to complete the questionnaire. A Likert scale on questionnaires 1 to 5 was used to elicit feedback. Five sustainability constructs were used: economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage, and government/community role. The results showed that the items in each study construct achieved an acceptable reliability level, with a Cronbach Alpha value greater than 0.70, and also met the normality test requirements. Descriptive analyses of the frequencies, percentages, and average mean values were used to establish each construct's level of sustainability. The results of the study show that the cities that attracted high scores were Georgetown (3.94), Taiping (4.00), Melaka City (3.76), and Muar (3.71). Meanwhile, the cities that attracted moderate scores were Kuala Kubu Bharu (3.36), Jugra (3.23), Tampin (3.37), Kuala Lipis (3.28), Kota Bharu (3.65) and Kuching (3.51). The implications of this study can be used to indicate the actual situation of the level of sustainability of heritage cities and be a reference to carry out the process of improvement towards a more sustainable city by 2030.","PeriodicalId":31244,"journal":{"name":"Forum Geografi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Geografi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/forgeo.v36i1.15287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to measure the level of sustainability of heritage cities in Malaysia. A thousand residents of ten selected heritage cities throughout Malaysia were selected as the respondents based on the cluster sampling and simple random methods to complete the questionnaire. A Likert scale on questionnaires 1 to 5 was used to elicit feedback. Five sustainability constructs were used: economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage, and government/community role. The results showed that the items in each study construct achieved an acceptable reliability level, with a Cronbach Alpha value greater than 0.70, and also met the normality test requirements. Descriptive analyses of the frequencies, percentages, and average mean values were used to establish each construct's level of sustainability. The results of the study show that the cities that attracted high scores were Georgetown (3.94), Taiping (4.00), Melaka City (3.76), and Muar (3.71). Meanwhile, the cities that attracted moderate scores were Kuala Kubu Bharu (3.36), Jugra (3.23), Tampin (3.37), Kuala Lipis (3.28), Kota Bharu (3.65) and Kuching (3.51). The implications of this study can be used to indicate the actual situation of the level of sustainability of heritage cities and be a reference to carry out the process of improvement towards a more sustainable city by 2030.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚遗产城市的可持续发展水平
本文旨在衡量马来西亚遗产城市的可持续性水平。采用整群抽样和简单随机抽样的方法,选取马来西亚10个选定遗产城市的1000名居民作为调查对象完成问卷。问卷1至5采用李克特量表进行反馈。研究使用了五个可持续性概念:经济、社会、环境、文化遗产和政府/社区角色。结果表明,各研究结构的项目达到可接受的信度水平,Cronbach Alpha值大于0.70,也满足正态性检验要求。使用频率、百分比和平均值的描述性分析来确定每个结构的可持续性水平。调查结果显示,得分较高的城市依次是乔治敦(3.94分)、太平(4.00分)、马六甲(3.76分)、麻峨(3.71分)。与此同时,得分中等的城市是吉隆坡巴鲁(3.36)、朱格拉(3.23)、淡平(3.37)、吉隆坡(3.28)、哥打巴鲁(3.65)和古晋(3.51)。本研究的启示可用于反映遗产城市可持续性水平的实际情况,并为到2030年开展更具可持续性的城市改善过程提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tourism Investment and Land Use Change in the Northern Piedmont of the Western High Atlas (1989-2022) Criminological Insights: A Comprehensive Spatial Analysis of Crime Hot Spots of Property Offenses in Malaysia's Urban Centers Analysis of Chlorophyll-a Variability in the Eastern Indonesian Waters Using Sentinel-3 OLCI from 2020-2021 Spatial Modelling Analysis for Potential Expansion of Cipanas City Candidate Area as Autonomous City Localizing Global Standards in Toba, Indonesia Through a Tourist-Centric Perspective On UNESCO Guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1