Stress Analysis Simulations of Welded and Bolted Joints Method for Full Steel and Composite-Steel Chassis Structure of Electric Low Floor Medium Bus

S. Sudirja, A. Hapid, Amin Amin, S. Kaleg, A. C. Budiman
{"title":"Stress Analysis Simulations of Welded and Bolted Joints Method for Full Steel and Composite-Steel Chassis Structure of Electric Low Floor Medium Bus","authors":"S. Sudirja, A. Hapid, Amin Amin, S. Kaleg, A. C. Budiman","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress analysis of welded steel-to-steel, bolted steel-to-steel, and bolted composite-steel chassis in an electric low floor medium bus structure is presented in this paper. The analysis was carried out on the condition that is when the bus is full of load in idle/static. This condition reflects the situation of the vehicle in full load with passengers and components, which is important to be analyzed to anticipate the unwanted structural failure of the chassis. Finite Element Method (Harmonic response simulation) is used to investigate the structural behavior of both welded and bolted methods. Several parameters such as 2 Hertz for the maximum frequency, 5000 kg for the total vehicle weight, and the uniform distribution of load are used for this study to simulate the simplified, real application in the real world. The first comparison is between the welded and bolted steel-to-steel chassis which results in the bolted method has a lower stress value by the difference of 4.3 MPa in the joint section than the welded joint. This means that the bolted joint is more recommended than welded for the use as an electric low floor medium bus and has the potential to be optimized further. In terms of reducing the weight of the chassis structure, then lightweight material (carbon fiber composite) is used to replace the full steel chassis to be a composite-steel chassis. The use of this hybrid material depicts the stress value of 61.5 MPa in the joint area, this value is still far below the limit of carbon fiber that is 3200 MPa makes this bolted composite-steel is considerably safe in full load condition as an electric low floor medium bus structure. Using this hybrid bolted composite-steel chassis structure also reduces the total chassis weight by about 22.7 % compared to the full steel chassis structure, thus one could expect to extend the mileage of electric vehicles by more than 20 %","PeriodicalId":11974,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Stress analysis of welded steel-to-steel, bolted steel-to-steel, and bolted composite-steel chassis in an electric low floor medium bus structure is presented in this paper. The analysis was carried out on the condition that is when the bus is full of load in idle/static. This condition reflects the situation of the vehicle in full load with passengers and components, which is important to be analyzed to anticipate the unwanted structural failure of the chassis. Finite Element Method (Harmonic response simulation) is used to investigate the structural behavior of both welded and bolted methods. Several parameters such as 2 Hertz for the maximum frequency, 5000 kg for the total vehicle weight, and the uniform distribution of load are used for this study to simulate the simplified, real application in the real world. The first comparison is between the welded and bolted steel-to-steel chassis which results in the bolted method has a lower stress value by the difference of 4.3 MPa in the joint section than the welded joint. This means that the bolted joint is more recommended than welded for the use as an electric low floor medium bus and has the potential to be optimized further. In terms of reducing the weight of the chassis structure, then lightweight material (carbon fiber composite) is used to replace the full steel chassis to be a composite-steel chassis. The use of this hybrid material depicts the stress value of 61.5 MPa in the joint area, this value is still far below the limit of carbon fiber that is 3200 MPa makes this bolted composite-steel is considerably safe in full load condition as an electric low floor medium bus structure. Using this hybrid bolted composite-steel chassis structure also reduces the total chassis weight by about 22.7 % compared to the full steel chassis structure, thus one could expect to extend the mileage of electric vehicles by more than 20 %
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动低地板中型客车全钢与复合钢底盘结构焊接与螺栓连接应力分析模拟方法
本文对某电动低地板中型客车结构的钢对钢焊接、钢对钢螺栓连接、钢对钢螺栓连接、钢对钢螺栓组合底盘进行了应力分析。分析是在空闲/静态状态下总线满载的情况下进行的。这一状态反映了车辆在满载时的情况,对其进行分析对于预测底盘结构失效具有重要意义。采用有限元法(谐波响应模拟)研究了焊接和螺栓两种方法的结构性能。本研究采用最大频率为2赫兹,车辆总重量为5000公斤,载荷均匀分布等几个参数来模拟在现实世界中的简化、真实应用。首先对钢对钢底盘进行了焊接和螺栓连接的对比,结果表明,螺栓连接方式在连接截面上的应力值比焊接方式低4.3 MPa。这意味着螺栓连接比焊接连接更适合用于电动低地板中型客车,并且有进一步优化的潜力。在减轻底盘结构重量方面,则采用轻质材料(碳纤维复合材料)代替全钢底盘,成为复合钢底盘。这种混合材料在接头区域的应力值为61.5 MPa,这一数值仍远低于碳纤维的极限3200mpa,使得这种螺栓复合钢作为电动低地板中型客车结构在满载状态下是相当安全的。与全钢底盘结构相比,使用这种混合螺栓复合钢底盘结构还可以减少约22.7%的底盘总重量,因此可以预期将电动汽车的行驶里程延长20%以上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nitrogen Diffusion in Vacancy-Rich Ferrite and Austenite, from First Principles to Applications Characterization of Impurities and Inclusions in Ferrochrome Alloy and Their Effects on the Inclusion Characteristics in Stainless Steels Kinetics of Silicon Production by Aluminothermic Reduction of Silica Using Aluminum and Aluminum Dross as Reductants The Properties of Carbon Blends in Submerged arc Furnaces SlagCalculator: A Framework for Slag and Metallurgical Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1