First Experience Matters: Evaluation of Acid Treatment Recipe for Fines Migration Control in S Field Sandstone Reservoirs

H. Bakar, Narindran Ravichandran, M. Abu Bakar, Khairul Nizam Idris, R. Masoudi
{"title":"First Experience Matters: Evaluation of Acid Treatment Recipe for Fines Migration Control in S Field Sandstone Reservoirs","authors":"H. Bakar, Narindran Ravichandran, M. Abu Bakar, Khairul Nizam Idris, R. Masoudi","doi":"10.4043/31508-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Restoring formation damage by acid matrix treatment in sandstone formations faces multiple challenges due to variable petrophysical and compositional properties. The S field team had carried out a formation damage study to determine the damage mechanism, evaluate the best acid treatment recipe to treat the formation damage mechanism identified and study the effect on petrophysical properties before and after the treatment. Most of the S field oil producers experienced rapid decline in production, and this is suspected to be due to fines migration and plugging.\n The formation damage study is divided into three sections: the field background review, the potential formation damage identification, and the evaluation of the best acid treatment recipe for S field formations. Core samples from a wide range of mineralogy, permeability, pore distributions and porosity were evaluated using laboratory testing to describe the elemental and morphological presence of each mineral. Then, four of the core samples were high graded for evaluating the permeability by flooding with brine and oil to examine the fines migration and dispersion potential of clays and siderite. The next phase of this study was continued with the core sample acidization using organic acid and HCl to identify a suitable acid treatment cocktail. This will be discussed in detail in this paper.\n Fines migration was observed to be resulted from movement of both siderite and aluminosilicate clays under representative conditions. The evidence from the geological analyses and core flooding shows that in brine, there is a tendency for siderite to migrate, potentially even at low flow rates. The effect is expected to be more severe in brine than in oil and possibly in both phases. HCl acid and strong organic acid treatments with and without the presence of an iron control to remove iron carbonates in siderites and iron-silicate gel formation will be outlined in this paper. The result of the HCl treatment was that it was able to remove carbonate material from the core, but it was still not able to substantially improve wellbore permeability. An additional short phase of testing examining a HF-HCl package was demonstrated more effective and is discussed extensively in this paper.\n This laboratory work is not unusual to the sandstone stimulation however the discussion of the core flood testing findings and acid recipe comparative study provides more comprehensive understanding on the effect of fines migration to the success of the stimulation treatment and its effect on petrophysical properties. The outcome of this work will lead to a reliable design of sandstone matrix acid treatments and, increase the acid stimulation treatment success rate which subsequently optimizes well productivity.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31508-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoring formation damage by acid matrix treatment in sandstone formations faces multiple challenges due to variable petrophysical and compositional properties. The S field team had carried out a formation damage study to determine the damage mechanism, evaluate the best acid treatment recipe to treat the formation damage mechanism identified and study the effect on petrophysical properties before and after the treatment. Most of the S field oil producers experienced rapid decline in production, and this is suspected to be due to fines migration and plugging. The formation damage study is divided into three sections: the field background review, the potential formation damage identification, and the evaluation of the best acid treatment recipe for S field formations. Core samples from a wide range of mineralogy, permeability, pore distributions and porosity were evaluated using laboratory testing to describe the elemental and morphological presence of each mineral. Then, four of the core samples were high graded for evaluating the permeability by flooding with brine and oil to examine the fines migration and dispersion potential of clays and siderite. The next phase of this study was continued with the core sample acidization using organic acid and HCl to identify a suitable acid treatment cocktail. This will be discussed in detail in this paper. Fines migration was observed to be resulted from movement of both siderite and aluminosilicate clays under representative conditions. The evidence from the geological analyses and core flooding shows that in brine, there is a tendency for siderite to migrate, potentially even at low flow rates. The effect is expected to be more severe in brine than in oil and possibly in both phases. HCl acid and strong organic acid treatments with and without the presence of an iron control to remove iron carbonates in siderites and iron-silicate gel formation will be outlined in this paper. The result of the HCl treatment was that it was able to remove carbonate material from the core, but it was still not able to substantially improve wellbore permeability. An additional short phase of testing examining a HF-HCl package was demonstrated more effective and is discussed extensively in this paper. This laboratory work is not unusual to the sandstone stimulation however the discussion of the core flood testing findings and acid recipe comparative study provides more comprehensive understanding on the effect of fines migration to the success of the stimulation treatment and its effect on petrophysical properties. The outcome of this work will lead to a reliable design of sandstone matrix acid treatments and, increase the acid stimulation treatment success rate which subsequently optimizes well productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一经验要点:S油田砂岩储层控制细粒运移的酸处理配方评价
由于岩石物性和成分性质的变化,对砂岩地层进行酸基质修复面临着诸多挑战。S油田团队进行了地层损伤研究,以确定损伤机理,评估最佳的酸处理配方来处理已确定的地层损伤机理,并研究处理前后对岩石物性的影响。大多数S油田的石油生产商都经历了产量的快速下降,这可能是由于细颗粒运移和堵塞造成的。储层损害研究分为三个部分:现场背景审查、潜在储层损害识别和S油田储层最佳酸处理配方评价。通过实验室测试,对各种矿物学、渗透率、孔隙分布和孔隙度的岩心样品进行了评估,以描述每种矿物的元素和形态存在。然后,对其中4个岩心样品进行高分级,通过盐水和油驱来评估渗透率,以检查粘土和菱铁矿的细粒迁移和分散潜力。该研究的下一阶段继续使用有机酸和盐酸对岩心样品进行酸化,以确定合适的酸处理混合物。本文将对此进行详细讨论。细粒迁移是由菱铁矿和铝硅酸盐粘土在代表性条件下的运动引起的。来自地质分析和岩心驱油的证据表明,在盐水中,即使在低流量下,菱铁矿也有迁移的趋势。预计这种影响在盐水中比在石油中更严重,可能在两种阶段都存在。本文将概述盐酸和强有机酸处理在含铁和不含铁控制剂的情况下去除菱铁矿和铁硅酸盐凝胶地层中的碳酸盐铁。HCl处理的结果是能够去除岩心中的碳酸盐物质,但仍然不能显著提高井筒渗透率。另外一个测试HF-HCl包的短期阶段被证明更有效,并在本文中进行了广泛的讨论。这种实验室工作在砂岩增产中并不少见,但是对岩心注水测试结果和酸配方对比研究的讨论,使人们更全面地了解了细粒运移对增产措施成功实施的影响及其对岩石物性的影响。这项工作的结果将导致可靠的砂岩基质酸处理设计,并提高酸增产处理的成功率,从而优化油井产能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Effective Framework of Integrated Development of Offshore Marginal Oilfields - Case Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir with Thin Layers An Experimental Investigation into the Potential of a Green Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir World's First Arsenic in Condensate Removal for Oil & Gas Industry and its Universal Applications for Adsorption Facilities Digital Well Construction with Mud Motor Applications Coreflooding Experiments on PAM/PEI Polymer Gel for Water Control in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions: With and Without Crossflow Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1