Knowing the known to understand the unknown- A systematic approach to reviewing the scientific literature

Y. Kuberappa, Arun H. S. Kumar
{"title":"Knowing the known to understand the unknown- A systematic approach to reviewing the scientific literature","authors":"Y. Kuberappa, Arun H. S. Kumar","doi":"10.5530/RJPS.2012.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every work must have a starting point, and scientifi c research is no exception. Reviewing literature is an initial step in undertaking scientifi c research. Reviewing literature, as an ongoing process, provides a critical overview on the topic of interest and keeps the researcher up-to-date to pursue novel research plans. While reviewing literature helps early career investigators identify their research niche, established researchers review the literature to propagate the state of the art progress/opinions in their fi eld of expertise. Most of these reviews often guide the general research community. Various formats are often adopted in writing a review depending on the context, audience, depth/complexity of subject and extent of commercial value. The primary goal is to provide a critical and simplifi ed analysis of the facts. Essentially, every researcher should adapt to these formats in a unique way and should try to develop their own style of reviewing the literature. In this review, we will describe some of the essential steps to approaching various formats of reviewing the literature.","PeriodicalId":21459,"journal":{"name":"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/RJPS.2012.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Every work must have a starting point, and scientifi c research is no exception. Reviewing literature is an initial step in undertaking scientifi c research. Reviewing literature, as an ongoing process, provides a critical overview on the topic of interest and keeps the researcher up-to-date to pursue novel research plans. While reviewing literature helps early career investigators identify their research niche, established researchers review the literature to propagate the state of the art progress/opinions in their fi eld of expertise. Most of these reviews often guide the general research community. Various formats are often adopted in writing a review depending on the context, audience, depth/complexity of subject and extent of commercial value. The primary goal is to provide a critical and simplifi ed analysis of the facts. Essentially, every researcher should adapt to these formats in a unique way and should try to develop their own style of reviewing the literature. In this review, we will describe some of the essential steps to approaching various formats of reviewing the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解已知,了解未知-一种系统的方法来审查科学文献
任何工作都必须有一个起点,科学研究也不例外。文献综述是进行科学研究的第一步。回顾文献,作为一个持续的过程,提供了对感兴趣的主题的关键概述,并使研究人员保持最新的追求新颖的研究计划。虽然回顾文献有助于早期职业研究者确定他们的研究利基,但成熟的研究人员回顾文献是为了宣传他们专业领域的最新进展/观点。这些评论中的大多数通常指导一般的研究界。根据上下文、受众、主题的深度/复杂性以及商业价值的程度,在撰写评论时通常采用不同的格式。主要目标是提供对事实的批判性和简化的分析。从本质上讲,每个研究人员都应该以独特的方式适应这些格式,并努力发展自己的文献回顾风格。在这篇综述中,我们将描述一些基本步骤,以接近各种格式的审查文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances of Niosomes as a Targeted Drug Delivery Syste Development of Dendrimer-5-Flurouracil and Folic acid Conjugation for the Treatment of Colon Cancer via Target Drug Delivery Neuroprotective Metabolites from Endophytic Microbes: A Review A Case Study on Tubercular Cavernous Sinus Syndrome Development and Evaluation of Floating Bilayer Tablet Containing Combination of Oxethazine and Cefixime Trihydrate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1