Legal Effectiveness of The Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP) in Giving Recommendations About Regulations that Conflict with Pancasila Values

Q1 Arts and Humanities Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2831
Anshari Ahmad Syah Hanafi, I. Irwansyah, Z. Aspan
{"title":"Legal Effectiveness of The Pancasila Ideology Development Agency (BPIP) in Giving Recommendations About Regulations that Conflict with Pancasila Values","authors":"Anshari Ahmad Syah Hanafi, I. Irwansyah, Z. Aspan","doi":"10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain the legal effectiveness of BPIP's recommendations on statutory regulations that are contrary to Pancasila values and the main factors that are internal obstacles to BPIP institutions. This type of research uses normative-empirical research. This type of research uses secondary data (from the library) and is supported by primary data based on field research, such as observations, interviews and surveys. Using a normative/juridical approach and a philosophical/ideal values approach. The results of this study are that the implementation of the duties and functions of the BPIP in providing recommendations on regulations that conflict with Pancasila values or the institutionalization of Pancasila values in a product of current legislation is not fully effective due to various influencing factors, including the weak institutionalization of Pancasila values in political institutions. , economic, and socio-cultural, and lack of consistency in making Pancasila the source of all sources of state law in the formation of statutory regulations, BPIP with its duties and functions can provide recommendations on statutory regulations that are contrary to the values of Pancasila but need to be strengthened again the form of the recommendation so that it is final and binding, bearing in mind that the recommendation policy issued by BPIP is only in the form of written input on the contents of regulations or laws that are not in line with Pancasila values.","PeriodicalId":31072,"journal":{"name":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal effectiveness of BPIP's recommendations on statutory regulations that are contrary to Pancasila values and the main factors that are internal obstacles to BPIP institutions. This type of research uses normative-empirical research. This type of research uses secondary data (from the library) and is supported by primary data based on field research, such as observations, interviews and surveys. Using a normative/juridical approach and a philosophical/ideal values approach. The results of this study are that the implementation of the duties and functions of the BPIP in providing recommendations on regulations that conflict with Pancasila values or the institutionalization of Pancasila values in a product of current legislation is not fully effective due to various influencing factors, including the weak institutionalization of Pancasila values in political institutions. , economic, and socio-cultural, and lack of consistency in making Pancasila the source of all sources of state law in the formation of statutory regulations, BPIP with its duties and functions can provide recommendations on statutory regulations that are contrary to the values of Pancasila but need to be strengthened again the form of the recommendation so that it is final and binding, bearing in mind that the recommendation policy issued by BPIP is only in the form of written input on the contents of regulations or laws that are not in line with Pancasila values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潘卡西拉意识形态发展机构(BPIP)对与潘卡西拉价值观相冲突的法规提出建议的法律效力
本研究旨在解释BPIP对与Pancasila价值观相反的法定法规的建议的法律效力,以及BPIP机构内部障碍的主要因素。这种类型的研究使用规范-实证研究。这种类型的研究使用二手数据(来自图书馆),并以基于实地研究的原始数据为基础,如观察、访谈和调查。使用规范/法律方法和哲学/理想价值方法。本研究的结果是,由于各种因素的影响,包括政治制度中潘卡西拉价值观的弱制度化,BPIP在对与潘卡西拉价值观相冲突的法规或潘卡西拉价值观在现行立法中的制度化提出建议方面的职责和职能并没有完全发挥作用。以及在制定法定法规时将Pancasila作为所有国家法律的来源缺乏一致性,BPIP的职责和职能可以就与Pancasila的价值观相悖的法定法规提供建议,但需要再次加强建议的形式,以使其具有最终性和约束力。请记住,BPIP发布的建议政策只是对不符合Pancasila价值观的法规或法律内容的书面输入形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum  Pranata Sosial
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Masyumi's Book "Djihad dan Qitaal" in Indonesia's Post-Independence War Efforts: A Historical and Legal Appraisal of Islamic Jus in Bello The Integration Between Syara’ and Ade’ in Marriage Tradition Bugis Bone, South Sulawesi Juridical Review of Foreign Investment Opportunities in Reinsurance Business in Indonesia Tinjauan Hukum Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Atas Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Sesuai dengan Aturan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia Strategi Pengembangan Pasar Digital dalam Mendukung Industri Fashion Halal Di Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1