First experiences to ground agroforestry Innovation Platforms into their local institutional context

J. Brouwers, D. Sanogo, Tionyélé Fayama, D. Dabiré, Brigitte Bastide, J. Seghieri, V. Ingram, J. Berg
{"title":"First experiences to ground agroforestry Innovation Platforms into their local institutional context","authors":"J. Brouwers, D. Sanogo, Tionyélé Fayama, D. Dabiré, Brigitte Bastide, J. Seghieri, V. Ingram, J. Berg","doi":"10.25518/1780-4507.20340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Description of the subject. We present a literature overview of innovation platform practices in Africa, combined with case studies of sub-national platforms established in Senegal and Burkina Faso. Objectives. The main objective was to understand how the facilitation process of innovation platforms can become more effective. Two specific objectives were to study RAMSES II innovation platform cases in Senegal and Burkina Faso where we observed and reflect on the facilitation of agroforestry innovation platforms. A final objective was to position the case results in a literature overview of IP experiences in Africa. Method. Information on innovation platforms was collected by combining an analysis of RAMSES II agroforestry innovation platform cases and an innovation platform literature review. Results. The study illustrates how the organizational position of the facilitating research agents contributed to shaping platform agendas, functions, and outcomes. This process hinges on the deployment of legitimacy claims, which appeal to technical expertise and scientific narratives, in this case on agroforestry. Institutional embeddedness is shown to be a critical aspect of agency in innovation platform multi-actor processes, contributing to framing local understandings of agroforestry and to channel collective efforts. Conclusions. The institutional identity of facilitating research agents and their relationship to members of a platform requires a more open and process oriented role. Coordination and facilitation roles can also be taken up by other members of the platform. This enhances the platform’s ability to ground their agendas into local needs and priorities. It also enhances sustainability, as active membership during the project period prepares platform members to continue after project closure.","PeriodicalId":87455,"journal":{"name":"Skull base surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull base surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.20340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Description of the subject. We present a literature overview of innovation platform practices in Africa, combined with case studies of sub-national platforms established in Senegal and Burkina Faso. Objectives. The main objective was to understand how the facilitation process of innovation platforms can become more effective. Two specific objectives were to study RAMSES II innovation platform cases in Senegal and Burkina Faso where we observed and reflect on the facilitation of agroforestry innovation platforms. A final objective was to position the case results in a literature overview of IP experiences in Africa. Method. Information on innovation platforms was collected by combining an analysis of RAMSES II agroforestry innovation platform cases and an innovation platform literature review. Results. The study illustrates how the organizational position of the facilitating research agents contributed to shaping platform agendas, functions, and outcomes. This process hinges on the deployment of legitimacy claims, which appeal to technical expertise and scientific narratives, in this case on agroforestry. Institutional embeddedness is shown to be a critical aspect of agency in innovation platform multi-actor processes, contributing to framing local understandings of agroforestry and to channel collective efforts. Conclusions. The institutional identity of facilitating research agents and their relationship to members of a platform requires a more open and process oriented role. Coordination and facilitation roles can also be taken up by other members of the platform. This enhances the platform’s ability to ground their agendas into local needs and priorities. It also enhances sustainability, as active membership during the project period prepares platform members to continue after project closure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将农林业创新平台融入当地制度背景的首批经验
主题描述。我们介绍了非洲创新平台实践的文献综述,并结合了在塞内加尔和布基纳法索建立的次国家平台的案例研究。目标。主要目的是了解创新平台的促进过程如何变得更有效。两个具体目标是研究塞内加尔和布基纳法索的RAMSES II创新平台案例,在这些案例中,我们观察并反思了农林业创新平台的促进作用。最后一个目标是将案例结果置于关于非洲知识产权经验的文献综述中。方法。结合RAMSES II农林业创新平台案例分析和创新平台文献综述,收集创新平台信息。结果。该研究说明了促进研究代理人的组织地位如何有助于形成平台议程,功能和结果。这一过程取决于合法性主张的部署,这需要技术专长和科学叙述,在这种情况下是农林业。制度嵌入性被证明是创新平台多参与者过程中机构的一个关键方面,有助于构建当地对农林业的理解并引导集体努力。结论。促进研究代理人的机构身份及其与平台成员的关系需要一个更加开放和以过程为导向的角色。协调和促进的角色也可以由平台的其他成员承担。这增强了平台根据当地需求和优先事项制定议程的能力。它还增强了可持续性,因为在项目期间的活跃会员资格为平台成员在项目结束后继续提供了准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caractérisation des acteurs de l’agroforesterie pour une co-conception de plateformes d’innovation suivant le transect Koumbia Guéguéré Dano au Burkina Faso Impact of contrasted bioavailable silicon inputs in a hydroponic system on the development of maize plants (Zea mays L.) Technology of a novel conidia-tablet formulation and packaging type to increase Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae) shelf life at room temperature Fluctuation des populations et évaluation des dégâts des mouches de fruits (Diptera : Tephritidae) dans les parcs à karité de l’Ouest du Burkina Faso : cas du transect Koumbia-Dano Yield response of African leafy vegetables to combined manure and urea microdosing in West Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1