South Sudan and the Four Dimensions of Power-Sharing: Political, Territorial, Military, and Economic

P. Wight
{"title":"South Sudan and the Four Dimensions of Power-Sharing: Political, Territorial, Military, and Economic","authors":"P. Wight","doi":"10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.7.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Caroline Hartzell and Matthew Hoddie’s theoretical model of power-sharing’s four dimensions—political, territorial, military, and economic—is used here to analyze successive peace processes in South Sudan. This multifaceted power-sharing strategy was utilized within both the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), designed to resolve Sudan’s intractable North-South conflict, as well as the 2015 Agreement on the Resolution of the Crisis in South Sudan (ARCISS) that addressed a continuation of intra-South violence. This study investigates the breakdown between the expected outcome of this power-sharing model and its implementation. Despite the international community’s stated objective of building a post-conflict order in which these four levers of state power are guided by liberal democratic principles, South Sudan’s peace processes have descended into an elite bargain over how the spoils of patronage are dispersed. This divergence is explained by the interference of strategic interests at the national, regional, and global levels.","PeriodicalId":7615,"journal":{"name":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.7.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:Caroline Hartzell and Matthew Hoddie’s theoretical model of power-sharing’s four dimensions—political, territorial, military, and economic—is used here to analyze successive peace processes in South Sudan. This multifaceted power-sharing strategy was utilized within both the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), designed to resolve Sudan’s intractable North-South conflict, as well as the 2015 Agreement on the Resolution of the Crisis in South Sudan (ARCISS) that addressed a continuation of intra-South violence. This study investigates the breakdown between the expected outcome of this power-sharing model and its implementation. Despite the international community’s stated objective of building a post-conflict order in which these four levers of state power are guided by liberal democratic principles, South Sudan’s peace processes have descended into an elite bargain over how the spoils of patronage are dispersed. This divergence is explained by the interference of strategic interests at the national, regional, and global levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南苏丹与权力分享的四个维度:政治、领土、军事和经济
Caroline Hartzell和Matthew Hoddie提出的权力分享的四个维度——政治、领土、军事和经济——的理论模型在这里被用来分析南苏丹的连续和平进程。2005年旨在解决苏丹棘手的南北冲突的《全面和平协议》(CPA)和2015年解决南苏丹内部持续暴力的《解决南苏丹危机协议》(ARCISS)都采用了这一多方面的权力分享战略。本研究探讨权力分享模式的预期结果与实施之间的断裂。尽管国际社会的既定目标是建立一个冲突后的秩序,在这个秩序中,这四个国家权力杠杆受到自由民主原则的指导,但南苏丹的和平进程已经沦为一场关于如何分配庇护战利品的精英讨价还价。这种分歧可以用国家、地区和全球层面战略利益的干扰来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peace Clubs in Nigerian Schools: Impact and Policy Implications Communal Violence in Nigeria, 2014–21: Mapping, Modeling, and Trends Forgive and for—What? How Sierra Leone Has Tried to Ignore Eleven Years of Traumatic Experience African Spirituality and the Gukurahundi Mass Grave Exhumations in Zimbabwe Migratory Pastoralism, Herders-Farmers Conflicts, and the Ruga Settlement Policy in North Central Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1