Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Problemy Ekorozwoju Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.35784/preko.3941
Magdaléna Drastichová, P. Filzmoser, Rastko Gajanin
{"title":"Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries","authors":"Magdaléna Drastichová, P. Filzmoser, Rastko Gajanin","doi":"10.35784/preko.3941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life, which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010 – 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e. the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be included. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal component analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified. Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, wellbeing and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health, particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of them had the highest values in the developed countries. ","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life, which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010 – 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e. the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be included. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal component analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified. Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, wellbeing and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health, particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of them had the highest values in the developed countries. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组选定的发达国家的幸福与可持续发展之间的关系
这项工作评估了与福祉和生活质量相关的可持续发展(SD)的关键方面,并在2010年至2019年期间通过31个国家的22个相关指标(指数)进行了衡量。可持续发展的所有支柱都得到反映,而所采用的指标要么反映其中一个方面,即可持续发展的经济、社会或环境支柱,要么反映其中两个或全部。其中一些指标还衡量特定支柱所包含的具体方面,这些方面对可持续发展非常重要,必须列入其中。其中特别包括健康和不平等问题,它们属于可持续发展的社会支柱,并反映在所使用的几个指标中。此外,主观幸福感指标也包括在内。主成分分析(PCA)和平行因子分析(PARAFAC)是用于分析22个指标(复合指数)之间关系的主要方法,这些指标反映了样本中SD、幸福感和生活质量的关键方面。这两种分析进行了三个阶段。两者的结果相似。主成分1(用于PCA)/主成分1(用于PARAFAC)将样本分为欠发达国家和较发达国家,因为正贡献主要由社会经济,福祉和更复杂的环境或SD指标决定,这些指标在较发达的国家中主要是最高的(高)。相反,负贡献是由污染损害指标决定的,这些指标在较不发达国家是最高的。主成分2(用于PCA)/成分2(用于PARAFAC)根据可持续发展的社会支柱的一个关键方面对样本进行了划分,即健康质量,特别是在出生时健康寿命年数(HLY)中反映出来,这在许多发达国家的结果也很差。在第三阶段,这一组成部分由反映资源耗竭/消耗以及以货币计算的污染损害的环境指标决定,这对可持续发展至关重要,因为其中一些指标在发达国家的价值最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Inclusive Economy as a Component of Sustainable Development Attitudes Towards Environmental Protection in International Comparative Research Assessing Forest Conservation Strategies for Biodiversity Restoration and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis of Global Income Groups Kilka uwag o zrównoważonym rozwoju sfery edukacji. Postulowana i faktyczna poprawa edukacji Analysis of the Decisive Factors of Government Attracting Tourists in Public Management from the Perspective of Environmental Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1