Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin, in Addition to Metformin, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.7175/fe.v23i1.1539
E. Mannucci, G. Ghetti
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin, in Addition to Metformin, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy","authors":"E. Mannucci, G. Ghetti","doi":"10.7175/fe.v23i1.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases represent the main cause of mortality and morbidity in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Empagliflozin is used as a treatment for T2DM because of its association with reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF). Recently oral semaglutide, in association with metformin, has shown better results. This study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus oral semaglutide, in addition to metformin, in patients with T2DM who are inadequately controlled on metformin alone in Italy.METHODS: This analysis was conducted from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model. For the base case analysis, a 50-year time horizon was chosen to capture the complications, their associated costs, and the final impact on life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Cohort baseline characteristics and efficacy data, were mainly sourced from the PIONEER 2 study. Health-state utilities and event disutilities were based on published sources. Drug acquisition and administration costs and patient management inputs were sourced from Italian-specific data. A sensitivity analysis and a range of scenario analyses were carried out.RESULTS: In the base case analysis treatment cost of empagliflozin plus metformin were significantly lower compared to oral semaglutide plus metformin both including and excluding the effect of empagliflozin on hHF (€-13.371/€-13.580; LYs -0.004/0.109 and QALYs -0.037/0.038). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model with empagliflozin plus metformin that was dominant in 63% and in 42% of simulations considering and non-considering the treatment effect on hHF, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin 25 mg plus metformin is a cost-effective option versus oral semaglutide 14 mg plus metformin for patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin alone in Italy","PeriodicalId":41585,"journal":{"name":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmeconomia-Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v23i1.1539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases represent the main cause of mortality and morbidity in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Empagliflozin is used as a treatment for T2DM because of its association with reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF). Recently oral semaglutide, in association with metformin, has shown better results. This study analyzes the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin versus oral semaglutide, in addition to metformin, in patients with T2DM who are inadequately controlled on metformin alone in Italy.METHODS: This analysis was conducted from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model. For the base case analysis, a 50-year time horizon was chosen to capture the complications, their associated costs, and the final impact on life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Cohort baseline characteristics and efficacy data, were mainly sourced from the PIONEER 2 study. Health-state utilities and event disutilities were based on published sources. Drug acquisition and administration costs and patient management inputs were sourced from Italian-specific data. A sensitivity analysis and a range of scenario analyses were carried out.RESULTS: In the base case analysis treatment cost of empagliflozin plus metformin were significantly lower compared to oral semaglutide plus metformin both including and excluding the effect of empagliflozin on hHF (€-13.371/€-13.580; LYs -0.004/0.109 and QALYs -0.037/0.038). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model with empagliflozin plus metformin that was dominant in 63% and in 42% of simulations considering and non-considering the treatment effect on hHF, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin 25 mg plus metformin is a cost-effective option versus oral semaglutide 14 mg plus metformin for patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin alone in Italy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在意大利,恩格列净和二甲双胍在2型糖尿病患者中的成本效益
背景:心血管疾病是2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者死亡和发病的主要原因。恩帕列净被用于治疗2型糖尿病,因为它与降低心力衰竭住院风险(hHF)有关。最近口服西马鲁肽联合二甲双胍显示出更好的效果。本研究分析了在意大利单独使用二甲双胍控制不充分的T2DM患者中,恩格列净与口服semaglutide以及二甲双胍的成本-效果。方法:采用IQVIA核心糖尿病模型,从意大利国家卫生服务(SSN)的角度进行分析。对于基本案例分析,选择50年的时间范围来捕获并发症、相关成本以及对获得的生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)的最终影响。队列基线特征和疗效数据主要来自PIONEER 2研究。运行状况实用程序和事件不实用程序基于已发布的来源。药品采购和管理费用以及患者管理投入来自意大利特定数据。进行了敏感性分析和一系列情景分析。结果:在基本病例分析中,恩帕列净加二甲双胍的治疗成本显著低于口服西马鲁肽加二甲双胍,包括和不包括恩帕列净对hHF的影响(€-13.371/€-13.580;LYs -0.004/0.109和QALYs -0.037/0.038)。敏感性分析证实了恩格列净加二甲双胍模型的稳健性,在考虑和不考虑hHF治疗效果的模拟中,恩格列净加二甲双胍分别占63%和42%的优势。结论:在意大利,恩帕列净25mg +二甲双胍与口服semaglutide 14mg +二甲双胍相比,对于单独使用二甲双胍控制的2型糖尿病患者而言,是一种更具成本效益的选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The Importance of the Pharmacoeconomic Analyses in Drug Negotiation. A Farewell Editorial [Measurement-Based Procurement Approach for Biosimilars in Italy: A Position Paper] [Burden of Short Bowel Syndrome in Italy: Direct and Indirect Costs and Quality of Life] Cost-effectiveness of Empagliflozin, in Addition to Metformin, in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy [Budget Impact Analysis of the Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly in Italy]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1