A Comparison of Weighted Least Square and Quantile Regression for Solving Heteroscedasticity in Simple Linear Regression

IF 1.1 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.33369/jsds.v1i1.21011
Welly Fransiska, S. Nugroho, R. Rachmawati
{"title":"A Comparison of Weighted Least Square and Quantile Regression for Solving Heteroscedasticity in Simple Linear Regression","authors":"Welly Fransiska, S. Nugroho, R. Rachmawati","doi":"10.33369/jsds.v1i1.21011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression analysis is the study of the relationship between dependent variable and one or more independent variables. One of the important assumption that must be fulfilled to get the regression coefficient estimator Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) is homoscedasticity. If the homoscedasticity assumption is violated then it is called heteroscedasticity. The consequences of heteroscedasticity are the estimator remain linear and unbiased, but it can cause estimator haven‘t a minimum variance so the estimator is no longer BLUE. The purpose of this study is to analyze and resolve the violation of heteroscedasticity assumption with Weighted Least Square(WLS) and Quantile Regression. Based on the results of the comparison between WLS and Quantile Regression obtained the most precise method used to overcome heteroscedasticity in this research is the WLS method because it produces that is greater (98%).","PeriodicalId":29911,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/jsds.v1i1.21011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regression analysis is the study of the relationship between dependent variable and one or more independent variables. One of the important assumption that must be fulfilled to get the regression coefficient estimator Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) is homoscedasticity. If the homoscedasticity assumption is violated then it is called heteroscedasticity. The consequences of heteroscedasticity are the estimator remain linear and unbiased, but it can cause estimator haven‘t a minimum variance so the estimator is no longer BLUE. The purpose of this study is to analyze and resolve the violation of heteroscedasticity assumption with Weighted Least Square(WLS) and Quantile Regression. Based on the results of the comparison between WLS and Quantile Regression obtained the most precise method used to overcome heteroscedasticity in this research is the WLS method because it produces that is greater (98%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加权最小二乘与分位数回归求解简单线性回归异方差的比较
回归分析是研究因变量与一个或多个自变量之间的关系。得到回归系数估计量最佳线性无偏估计量(BLUE)必须满足的一个重要假设是均方差。如果违背了同方差假设,则称之为异方差。异方差的结果是估计量保持线性和无偏,但它可能导致估计量没有最小方差,因此估计量不再是BLUE。本研究的目的是利用加权最小二乘法和分位数回归分析和解决异方差假设的违反。根据WLS和分位数回归的比较结果得出,本研究中用于克服异方差的最精确的方法是WLS方法,因为它产生的异方差更大(98%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Reduced-bias estimator of the ruin probability in infinite time for heavy-tailed distributions with index in the upper half of the unit interval Estimation and backtesting of risk measures with emphasis on distortion risk measures Bayesian projection of cohort healthy life expectancies with long-term care insurance data Likelihood-based instrumental variable methods for Cox proportional hazards model Test for high-dimensional outliers with principal component analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1