The Effect of Rurality and Poverty on COPD Outcomes in New Hampshire: an Analysis of Statewide Hospital Discharge Data.

Jacob S Warner, Jane M Bryan, L. Paulin
{"title":"The Effect of Rurality and Poverty on COPD Outcomes in New Hampshire: an Analysis of Statewide Hospital Discharge Data.","authors":"Jacob S Warner, Jane M Bryan, L. Paulin","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A3030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nIndividuals in rural areas of the US have greater risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and have worse COPD outcomes. New Hampshire (NH) is split between non-rural and rural counties.\n\n\nMethods\nWe examined differences in COPD exacerbation rate ((encounters per county/county population of 35 years of age and older) times 100), length of stay (LOS), and total charges by rurality, determined by 2013 NCHS rural-urban classification. Linear regression analysis determined the association of rural status on COPD outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, insurance status, and county-level smoking prevalence.\n\n\nFindings\n15916 encounters were analyzed, 5805 inpatient and 10111 emergency department, 7058 (44%) male, and mean age 65.6. 31% were from large fringe metro counties, 25.9% from medium metro counties, 37.6% from micropolitan counties and 5.5% from non-core counties. In multivariable regression, rural counties had higher COPD exacerbation rates compared to urban counties; (non-core beta = 0.18, [CI 0.16, 0.20]; micropolitan beta = 0.02, CI [0.01, 0.03]); medium metro (beta = -0.07, Cl [-0.09, -0.06] had lower rates of COPD exacerbations (P < 0.001 for all). Compared to urban counties, encounters from rural counties had lower total charges (medium metro beta = -1695 [-2410, -980]; micropolitan beta = -2701 [-3315, -2088]; non-core beta = -4453 [-5646, -3260], all p<0.001). LOS did not differ by rurality.\n\n\nConclusions\nAccounting for poverty and other sociodemographic factors, the rates of COPD exacerbation encounters were higher in rural vs. non-rural NH counties. Additionally, non-rural areas carried higher total charges, potentially due to more resource availability. These results support the need for future interventions to improve outcomes in rural COPD patients.","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A3030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Individuals in rural areas of the US have greater risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and have worse COPD outcomes. New Hampshire (NH) is split between non-rural and rural counties. Methods We examined differences in COPD exacerbation rate ((encounters per county/county population of 35 years of age and older) times 100), length of stay (LOS), and total charges by rurality, determined by 2013 NCHS rural-urban classification. Linear regression analysis determined the association of rural status on COPD outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, insurance status, and county-level smoking prevalence. Findings 15916 encounters were analyzed, 5805 inpatient and 10111 emergency department, 7058 (44%) male, and mean age 65.6. 31% were from large fringe metro counties, 25.9% from medium metro counties, 37.6% from micropolitan counties and 5.5% from non-core counties. In multivariable regression, rural counties had higher COPD exacerbation rates compared to urban counties; (non-core beta = 0.18, [CI 0.16, 0.20]; micropolitan beta = 0.02, CI [0.01, 0.03]); medium metro (beta = -0.07, Cl [-0.09, -0.06] had lower rates of COPD exacerbations (P < 0.001 for all). Compared to urban counties, encounters from rural counties had lower total charges (medium metro beta = -1695 [-2410, -980]; micropolitan beta = -2701 [-3315, -2088]; non-core beta = -4453 [-5646, -3260], all p<0.001). LOS did not differ by rurality. Conclusions Accounting for poverty and other sociodemographic factors, the rates of COPD exacerbation encounters were higher in rural vs. non-rural NH counties. Additionally, non-rural areas carried higher total charges, potentially due to more resource availability. These results support the need for future interventions to improve outcomes in rural COPD patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村和贫困对新罕布什尔州慢性阻塞性肺病结局的影响:对全州医院出院数据的分析
目的:美国农村地区的个体患慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的风险更高,COPD的预后也更差。新罕布什尔州(NH)分为非农村县和农村县。方法:根据2013年NCHS城乡分类,我们研究了COPD加重率((每个县/ 35岁及以上的县人口的就诊次数)乘以100)、住院时间(LOS)和总收费的差异。线性回归分析确定了农村状况与COPD结局的关系,调整了年龄、性别、保险状况和县级吸烟率。分析了15916例就诊病例,其中住院5805例,急诊科10111例,男性7058例(44%),平均年龄65.6岁。31%来自大城市边缘县,25.9%来自中等城市县,37.6%来自小城市县,5.5%来自非核心县。在多变量回归中,农村县的COPD加重率高于城市县;(非核心beta = 0.18, [CI 0.16, 0.20];micropolitan beta = 0.02, CI [0.01, 0.03]);中等地铁(β = -0.07, Cl [-0.09, -0.06]) COPD加重率较低(P < 0.001)。与城市县相比,农村县的总收费较低(中等地铁beta = -1695 [-2410, -980];Micropolitan beta = -2701 [-3315, -2088];非核心beta = -4453[-5646, -3260],均p<0.001)。LOS没有因乡村而异。结论:考虑到贫困和其他社会人口因素,农村的慢性阻塞性肺病加重率高于非农村的NH县。此外,非农村地区的总收费较高,这可能是由于更多的可用资源。这些结果支持未来干预措施改善农村COPD患者预后的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1