{"title":"17 Molecular Mechanisms of Aging: Insights from Budding Yeast","authors":"Su-Ju Lin, D. Sinclair","doi":"10.1101/087969824.51.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until the late 1980s, the prevailing view among researchers was that life span of any organism, even yeast, could not be regulated, let alone by just a few genes. The view was based on the fact that aging is an incredibly complex process that is affected by thousands of genes. Then, in just a few years, genetic studies in model organisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans uncovered numerous single-gene mutations that extend life span (Jazwinski et al. 1993; Kenyon et al. 1993; Kennedy et al. 1995). What had researchers overlooked prior to 1990? The major oversight appears to have been the failure to foresee that organisms have evolved to promote their survival, and hence longevity, during times of adversity. Longevity regulation, as it has come to be known, is now thought of as a highly adaptive biological trait that is conserved all the way from yeast to mammals (Kirkwood and Holliday 1979; Kenyon 2001). When Andrew Barton first proposed in 1950 that S. cerevisiae might serve as a model for aging, he was met with considerable skepticism (Barton 1950). It was difficult for most researchers to accept that a simple unicellular organism could provide any information about aging. But we have since learned never to underestimate a fungus. Today, S. cerevisiae is one of the most highly utilized models for aging, and dozens of longevity genes have been identified. Translating these findings to mammals is one of the major challenges for researchers during the next decade. BIOLOGY OF...","PeriodicalId":10493,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","volume":"42 1","pages":"483-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/087969824.51.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Abstract
Until the late 1980s, the prevailing view among researchers was that life span of any organism, even yeast, could not be regulated, let alone by just a few genes. The view was based on the fact that aging is an incredibly complex process that is affected by thousands of genes. Then, in just a few years, genetic studies in model organisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans uncovered numerous single-gene mutations that extend life span (Jazwinski et al. 1993; Kenyon et al. 1993; Kennedy et al. 1995). What had researchers overlooked prior to 1990? The major oversight appears to have been the failure to foresee that organisms have evolved to promote their survival, and hence longevity, during times of adversity. Longevity regulation, as it has come to be known, is now thought of as a highly adaptive biological trait that is conserved all the way from yeast to mammals (Kirkwood and Holliday 1979; Kenyon 2001). When Andrew Barton first proposed in 1950 that S. cerevisiae might serve as a model for aging, he was met with considerable skepticism (Barton 1950). It was difficult for most researchers to accept that a simple unicellular organism could provide any information about aging. But we have since learned never to underestimate a fungus. Today, S. cerevisiae is one of the most highly utilized models for aging, and dozens of longevity genes have been identified. Translating these findings to mammals is one of the major challenges for researchers during the next decade. BIOLOGY OF...
直到20世纪80年代末,研究人员的主流观点是,任何生物的寿命,即使是酵母,都无法被调节,更不用说仅仅由几个基因来调节了。这种观点是基于这样一个事实:衰老是一个极其复杂的过程,受数千个基因的影响。然后,在短短几年内,对酿酒酵母和秀丽隐杆线虫等模式生物的遗传研究发现了许多延长寿命的单基因突变(Jazwinski et al. 1993;Kenyon et al. 1993;Kennedy et al. 1995)。在1990年之前,研究人员忽视了什么?最主要的疏忽似乎是没有预见到生物的进化是为了在逆境中促进生存,从而延长寿命。众所周知,长寿调节现在被认为是一种高度适应性的生物特性,从酵母菌到哺乳动物一直被保存下来(Kirkwood and Holliday 1979;凯尼恩2001)。当Andrew Barton在1950年首次提出酿酒葡萄球菌可以作为衰老的模型时,他遭到了相当多的质疑(Barton 1950)。对于大多数研究人员来说,很难接受一个简单的单细胞生物可以提供任何有关衰老的信息。但从那以后,我们学会了永远不要低估真菌。今天,酿酒葡萄球菌是最常用的衰老模型之一,已经确定了数十个长寿基因。将这些发现转化为哺乳动物是未来十年研究人员面临的主要挑战之一。生物学……