Russian Foreign Policy Dynamics in the South Caucasus. Continuity and Existing Problems

Anush Brutian
{"title":"Russian Foreign Policy Dynamics in the South Caucasus. Continuity and Existing Problems","authors":"Anush Brutian","doi":"10.56673/18294502-22.14-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History helps us to create a wider picture of the reality in which the South Caucasus exists now. That is why we are going to discover the influence of the Russian Imperial and Soviet eras on the states in the region and identify the causality of foreign policy relations between Russia and the South Caucasian states. The main question is why neither Russia nor any of the individual South Caucasian states succeeded in developing an effective strategy towards each other despite their shared borders in the Russia-Azerbaijan and Russia-Georgia cases and being a proclaimed strategic partner in the case of Armenia? How did the Soviet period influence the current state of relations between Russia and the South Caucasian states? Those are the issues analyzed in this paper. International relations in the South Caucasus are convoluted because of their rich and complicated past, among other things. Over the centuries, interstate relations inside the region developed in unpredictable directions. Georgia was a real partner for Russia in the conquest of the Caucasus in the 19th century. Yet, since 1991, relations between Russia and Georgia have been tense at best. The proclaimed secular states of Azerbaijan, though mainly Shia, and Turkey, which is mostly Sunni, are now solid allies, whereas Armenia enjoys a relationship of trust with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Turkey, Iran, and Russia are still the main external players in the region though they have, to some extent, even become “domesticated”. Except for a brief period of turmoil during the Bolshevik Revolution and the ensuing Russian Civil War, the entire Caucasus remained within the Russian sphere of influence until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Even now Russia continues to play a significant role in economy, energy and security policy in the South Caucasus.","PeriodicalId":53423,"journal":{"name":"Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56673/18294502-22.14-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History helps us to create a wider picture of the reality in which the South Caucasus exists now. That is why we are going to discover the influence of the Russian Imperial and Soviet eras on the states in the region and identify the causality of foreign policy relations between Russia and the South Caucasian states. The main question is why neither Russia nor any of the individual South Caucasian states succeeded in developing an effective strategy towards each other despite their shared borders in the Russia-Azerbaijan and Russia-Georgia cases and being a proclaimed strategic partner in the case of Armenia? How did the Soviet period influence the current state of relations between Russia and the South Caucasian states? Those are the issues analyzed in this paper. International relations in the South Caucasus are convoluted because of their rich and complicated past, among other things. Over the centuries, interstate relations inside the region developed in unpredictable directions. Georgia was a real partner for Russia in the conquest of the Caucasus in the 19th century. Yet, since 1991, relations between Russia and Georgia have been tense at best. The proclaimed secular states of Azerbaijan, though mainly Shia, and Turkey, which is mostly Sunni, are now solid allies, whereas Armenia enjoys a relationship of trust with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Turkey, Iran, and Russia are still the main external players in the region though they have, to some extent, even become “domesticated”. Except for a brief period of turmoil during the Bolshevik Revolution and the ensuing Russian Civil War, the entire Caucasus remained within the Russian sphere of influence until the collapse of the Soviet Union. Even now Russia continues to play a significant role in economy, energy and security policy in the South Caucasus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯在南高加索的外交政策动态。连续性及存在的问题
历史帮助我们对南高加索目前存在的现实有了更广泛的了解。这就是为什么我们要发现俄罗斯帝国和苏联时代对该地区国家的影响,并确定俄罗斯与南高加索国家之间外交政策关系的因果关系。主要的问题是,尽管俄罗斯与阿塞拜疆、俄罗斯与格鲁吉亚的边界是共同的,而且在亚美尼亚的问题上也宣称是战略伙伴,但为什么俄罗斯和任何一个南高加索国家都没有成功地制定出有效的相互战略?苏联时期是如何影响俄罗斯与南高加索国家关系的现状的?这些都是本文分析的问题。南高加索地区的国际关系因其丰富而复杂的过去而变得错综复杂。几个世纪以来,该地区的州际关系朝着不可预测的方向发展。格鲁吉亚是俄罗斯在19世纪征服高加索地区的真正伙伴。然而,自1991年以来,俄罗斯和格鲁吉亚的关系充其量只是紧张。自称为世俗国家的阿塞拜疆,虽然主要是什叶派,和土耳其,主要是逊尼派,现在是坚实的盟友,而亚美尼亚与伊朗伊斯兰共和国享有信任关系。土耳其、伊朗和俄罗斯仍然是该地区主要的外部参与者,尽管它们在某种程度上甚至被“驯化”了。除了布尔什维克革命和随后的俄罗斯内战期间的短暂动荡之外,整个高加索地区一直在俄罗斯的势力范围内,直到苏联解体。直到现在,俄罗斯仍在南高加索地区的经济、能源和安全政策方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin
Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
期刊最新文献
The Role of Islam in the Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism Red Lines and Green Lights: Iran’s Balancing Policy in the South Caucasus Performance of tubular elastic charges in natural stone production Improvement of tunnel boring machine S-782 cutter head Experimental justification of cyanoethyl dithiocarbamate usability toward enhanced copper and silver recovery from old waste at Solnechny GOK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1