4CPS-338 Use and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia

JL Ortiz Latorre, N. Casanova, C. Lopez, E. Yáñez, I. Moya-Carmona
{"title":"4CPS-338 Use and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia","authors":"JL Ortiz Latorre, N. Casanova, C. Lopez, E. Yáñez, I. Moya-Carmona","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Tocilizumab is an anti-human IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in patients with pneumonia associated with coronavirus disease. Despite the data from the COVACTA study, tocilizumab continues to be the gold standard for patients in our centre. Aim and objectives To describe the use of tocilizumab in the first peak versus the second peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to describe the results of the use of tocilizumab in both situations. Material and methods All patients treated with tocilizumab were included in the study periods: first peak (March to June 2020) and second peak (August to the present 2020). Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Data were obtained from the electronic medical records and prescription applications. Results 65 patients were included, 36 patients (55.38%) in the first peak versus 29 patients (44.62%) in the second peak. Conclusion and relevance In the first peak, tocilizumab was prescribed to more serious patients: those admitted to the ICU, with a higher FINE score and needing aggressive support therapy. In addition, it was prescribed in patients with a higher D-dimer. Doses and number of administrations were higher in the first peak. New scientific evidence led to the use of different concomitant treatments in the second peak: corticosteroids (second peak dexamethasone versus first peak methylprednisolone) and antiviral therapy (only remdesivir in the second peak). In the second peak, hospital and ICU stays were shorter, probably because tocilizumab was used in less serious patients. Despite this, no differences in mortality were observed. A study limitation was sample size. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Tocilizumab is an anti-human IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in patients with pneumonia associated with coronavirus disease. Despite the data from the COVACTA study, tocilizumab continues to be the gold standard for patients in our centre. Aim and objectives To describe the use of tocilizumab in the first peak versus the second peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to describe the results of the use of tocilizumab in both situations. Material and methods All patients treated with tocilizumab were included in the study periods: first peak (March to June 2020) and second peak (August to the present 2020). Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Data were obtained from the electronic medical records and prescription applications. Results 65 patients were included, 36 patients (55.38%) in the first peak versus 29 patients (44.62%) in the second peak. Conclusion and relevance In the first peak, tocilizumab was prescribed to more serious patients: those admitted to the ICU, with a higher FINE score and needing aggressive support therapy. In addition, it was prescribed in patients with a higher D-dimer. Doses and number of administrations were higher in the first peak. New scientific evidence led to the use of different concomitant treatments in the second peak: corticosteroids (second peak dexamethasone versus first peak methylprednisolone) and antiviral therapy (only remdesivir in the second peak). In the second peak, hospital and ICU stays were shorter, probably because tocilizumab was used in less serious patients. Despite this, no differences in mortality were observed. A study limitation was sample size. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托珠单抗在重症COVID-19肺炎患者中的应用及疗效
背景和重要性Tocilizumab是一种抗人IL-6受体单克隆抗体,用于治疗冠状病毒相关肺炎患者的细胞因子释放综合征。尽管有来自COVACTA研究的数据,tocilizumab仍然是我们中心患者的金标准。目的和目标描述在SARS-CoV-2大流行的第一个高峰和第二个高峰期间托珠单抗的使用情况,并描述在这两种情况下使用托珠单抗的结果。材料与方法所有接受tocilizumab治疗的患者均纳入研究期间:第一个高峰(2020年3月至6月)和第二个高峰(2020年8月至现在)。收集人口学和临床变量。数据来自电子病历和处方应用程序。结果共纳入65例患者,第一峰36例(55.38%),第二峰29例(44.62%)。在第一个高峰,tocilizumab被用于更严重的患者:那些入住ICU的患者,具有更高的FINE评分,需要积极的支持治疗。此外,它也适用于d -二聚体较高的患者。第一个高峰的剂量和给药次数较高。新的科学证据导致在第二个高峰中使用不同的伴随治疗:皮质类固醇(第二个高峰地塞米松与第一个高峰甲基强的松龙)和抗病毒治疗(第二个高峰只有瑞德西韦)。在第二次高峰,住院和ICU的时间较短,可能是因为托珠单抗用于较轻的患者。尽管如此,没有观察到死亡率的差异。研究的局限性在于样本量。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1