A Note on the Association Between Thecaphora frezzii Infection and Peanut Pod Density

Peanut Science Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI:10.3146/PS20-27.1
R. Bennett, Ana V. Rodriguez, J. Baldessari, K. Chamberlin, M. Payton, Ning Wang
{"title":"A Note on the Association Between Thecaphora frezzii Infection and Peanut Pod Density","authors":"R. Bennett, Ana V. Rodriguez, J. Baldessari, K. Chamberlin, M. Payton, Ning Wang","doi":"10.3146/PS20-27.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The time and labor required to hand-screen germplasm are significant obstacles to developing cultivars resistant to peanut smut, but researchers have investigated few alternatives to manual disease evaluations. Although alternative approaches are available for separating materials based upon differences in density, it is unknown how healthy and infected pods differ in density, especially with the varying maturity levels present in real-world samples. For this reason, the pod densities from 13 peanut genotypes were estimated using a sand displacement approach. In addition, disease incidence and severity data were collected from a total of 45 plants representing 15 genotypes varying in resistance to peanut smut. As expected, the results from the pod density analyses showed significant differences between healthy mature and healthy immature pods. However, healthy mature and healthy immature pods were significantly more and less dense, respectively, than both mature infected and immature infected pods. While additional study is needed, it appears that methods employing differences in pod density may be useful for screening germplasm. Analyses of the disease incidence and severity data showed a strong positive correlation between the two disease measures, verifying a previous report. As a result, collecting disease incidence data alone may be sufficient for screening germplasm. These results may assist in developing more efficient phenotyping methods for screening germplasm for peanut smut resistance.","PeriodicalId":19823,"journal":{"name":"Peanut Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peanut Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3146/PS20-27.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The time and labor required to hand-screen germplasm are significant obstacles to developing cultivars resistant to peanut smut, but researchers have investigated few alternatives to manual disease evaluations. Although alternative approaches are available for separating materials based upon differences in density, it is unknown how healthy and infected pods differ in density, especially with the varying maturity levels present in real-world samples. For this reason, the pod densities from 13 peanut genotypes were estimated using a sand displacement approach. In addition, disease incidence and severity data were collected from a total of 45 plants representing 15 genotypes varying in resistance to peanut smut. As expected, the results from the pod density analyses showed significant differences between healthy mature and healthy immature pods. However, healthy mature and healthy immature pods were significantly more and less dense, respectively, than both mature infected and immature infected pods. While additional study is needed, it appears that methods employing differences in pod density may be useful for screening germplasm. Analyses of the disease incidence and severity data showed a strong positive correlation between the two disease measures, verifying a previous report. As a result, collecting disease incidence data alone may be sufficient for screening germplasm. These results may assist in developing more efficient phenotyping methods for screening germplasm for peanut smut resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
花生冷冻蚜感染与花生荚果密度关系的研究
手工筛选种质资源所需要的时间和人力是开发抗花生黑穗病品种的重大障碍,但研究人员已经研究了几种替代人工疾病评估的方法。虽然可以采用其他方法根据密度差异分离材料,但尚不清楚健康豆荚和受感染豆荚在密度上的差异,特别是在实际样品中存在不同成熟度的情况下。为此,采用沙置换法对13个花生基因型的荚果密度进行了估计。此外,还收集了45株植物的发病率和严重程度数据,这些植物代表了15种不同的花生黑穗病抗性基因型。正如预期的那样,荚果密度分析的结果显示健康成熟荚果和健康未成熟荚果之间存在显著差异。健康成熟荚果和健康未成熟荚果的密度分别显著高于和低于成熟感染荚果和未成熟感染荚果。虽然还需要进一步的研究,但利用荚果密度差异的方法可能对种质筛选有用。对疾病发病率和严重程度数据的分析显示,这两种疾病测量之间存在很强的正相关性,证实了先前的报告。因此,仅收集疾病发病率数据可能就足以进行种质筛选。这些结果可能有助于开发更有效的花生黑穗病抗性种质筛选表型方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Field Performance of Georgia-16HO and Florunner Cultivars in the Presence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Field Screening for Tomato Spotted Wilt and White Mold (Stem Rot) Resistance among Peanut Genotypes Effect of Peanut Skin Extracts on the Shelf Life of Unstabilized Peanut Butter Peanut Dryer Noise Levels with and without Muffler U.S. Peanut Quality: Industry Priorities to Mitigate Aflatoxin Risk from Farm to Consumer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1