Evaluation of the radiological risk in cargo scanning by comparison with known biological consequences

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radioprotection Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1051/radiopro/2021036
S.Q. Pelegrineli, A.X. Silva, W.S.S. Filho, L.S.R. Oliveira, R. Stenders, J. Junior, W. Pereira, E. Ramos De Andrade
{"title":"Evaluation of the radiological risk in cargo scanning by comparison with known biological consequences","authors":"S.Q. Pelegrineli, A.X. Silva, W.S.S. Filho, L.S.R. Oliveira, R. Stenders, J. Junior, W. Pereira, E. Ramos De Andrade","doi":"10.1051/radiopro/2021036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study proposes a quick, easy, and low-cost method that can be used to assess the radiological safety of an irradiation line used for cargo and container inspection facilities. The radiation-emitting equipment used was a Smiths Heimam particle accelerator model HCVP4029 operating at 4.5 MeV. The radiation dose measurements were performed using a personal radiation monitor Ultra Radac mod MRAD 111 (Geiger–Muller). The ambient equivalent dose H*(10) was estimated for two facilities: A (real) (1.12E-03 mSv per scan) and B (fictitious) (3.25E-03 mSv per scan). The dimensionless factor R, which represents a ratio between two specific scanning (Ss) quantities regarding the facilities A and B, is introduced as a reference for assessing the level of radiological safety. This study compares facilities A and B by using a simple alternative safety assessment based on the R factor. The dimensionless R-value appears to be able to facilitate both the personnel’s and the general public’s perception of risk levels, even with no fixed scale.","PeriodicalId":21009,"journal":{"name":"Radioprotection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioprotection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study proposes a quick, easy, and low-cost method that can be used to assess the radiological safety of an irradiation line used for cargo and container inspection facilities. The radiation-emitting equipment used was a Smiths Heimam particle accelerator model HCVP4029 operating at 4.5 MeV. The radiation dose measurements were performed using a personal radiation monitor Ultra Radac mod MRAD 111 (Geiger–Muller). The ambient equivalent dose H*(10) was estimated for two facilities: A (real) (1.12E-03 mSv per scan) and B (fictitious) (3.25E-03 mSv per scan). The dimensionless factor R, which represents a ratio between two specific scanning (Ss) quantities regarding the facilities A and B, is introduced as a reference for assessing the level of radiological safety. This study compares facilities A and B by using a simple alternative safety assessment based on the R factor. The dimensionless R-value appears to be able to facilitate both the personnel’s and the general public’s perception of risk levels, even with no fixed scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过与已知生物后果的比较来评估货物扫描中的辐射风险
本研究提出一种快速、简单、低成本的方法,可用于评估用于货物和集装箱检验设施的辐照线的辐射安全性。使用的辐射发射设备是史密斯海曼粒子加速器型号HCVP4029,工作在4.5 MeV。使用个人辐射监测仪Ultra Radac mod MRAD 111(盖革-穆勒)进行辐射剂量测量。估算了两个设施的环境等效剂量H*(10): A(真实)(每次扫描1.12E-03毫西弗)和B(虚构)(每次扫描3.25E-03毫西弗)。引入了无量纲因子R,它表示设施a和B的两个特定扫描量之间的比率,作为评估放射安全水平的参考。本研究使用基于R因子的简单替代安全评估来比较设施A和设施B。无量纲的r值似乎能够促进人员和公众对风险水平的感知,即使没有固定的尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radioprotection
Radioprotection ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
54.50%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radioprotection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes (theoretical and practical aspects): dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments.
期刊最新文献
Young generations facing post-nuclear accident situations: from Chernobyl to Fukushima Le principe de limitation des doses et la tolérabilité du risque radiologique Evaluation of Barium sulfate-copper breast radiation shield for use in thoracic Computed Tomography Examinations Natural radioactivity and radiological hazards assessment in soil samples of Hassan district, Karnataka State, India Balancing precision and safety: the crucial imperative of radiation dose optimization in radiology and the role of certified medical physicists in quality assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1