Capiz State University Stakeholders’ Satisfaction Index: Insights for Quality Service Delivery Enhancement

{"title":"Capiz State University Stakeholders’ Satisfaction Index: Insights for Quality Service Delivery Enhancement","authors":"","doi":"10.34104/ijma.023.00190023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research determined the stakeholder’s level of satisfaction with the dimensions of quality service delivery enhancement. It covered the stakeholder’s satisfaction with reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness. The results highlighted that the stakeholders’ satisfaction on the dimensions of quality service was higher than the service quality standard, especially in assurance and empathy, while above the minimum standard for reliability and responsiveness, and less comparable for tangibility. The research claimed high manifestations of quality of service as to assurance by personnel’s friendliness, familiarity with tasks, updated documents and information, availability of resources, courteous, promptly fulfilled promised services, and made stakeholders at ease and secure. The results scored a high stakeholders’ satisfaction on reliability and quality of service dimensions, records, and data were accurate, safely kept, available anytime and personnel gave clear information and alternative solutions to problems. Findings on stakeholders' satisfaction with responsiveness were above average except on clients’ insecurity where the client’s needs are heard, prompt service, courteous enough, and arranged time for clients to get the documents. The results on tangibility service quality were high, while the average for empathy. Moreover, there was a significant variation between the levels of respondents’ satisfaction and reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy but when it comes to tangibles, an insignificant difference was evident. When stakeholders were categorized by campus, there was a substantial variation in the level of satisfaction and service quality parameters, significant differences existed on reliability, responsiveness, tangibles, and empathy, while in terms of assurance, students’ satisfaction was similar.","PeriodicalId":42721,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34104/ijma.023.00190023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research determined the stakeholder’s level of satisfaction with the dimensions of quality service delivery enhancement. It covered the stakeholder’s satisfaction with reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness. The results highlighted that the stakeholders’ satisfaction on the dimensions of quality service was higher than the service quality standard, especially in assurance and empathy, while above the minimum standard for reliability and responsiveness, and less comparable for tangibility. The research claimed high manifestations of quality of service as to assurance by personnel’s friendliness, familiarity with tasks, updated documents and information, availability of resources, courteous, promptly fulfilled promised services, and made stakeholders at ease and secure. The results scored a high stakeholders’ satisfaction on reliability and quality of service dimensions, records, and data were accurate, safely kept, available anytime and personnel gave clear information and alternative solutions to problems. Findings on stakeholders' satisfaction with responsiveness were above average except on clients’ insecurity where the client’s needs are heard, prompt service, courteous enough, and arranged time for clients to get the documents. The results on tangibility service quality were high, while the average for empathy. Moreover, there was a significant variation between the levels of respondents’ satisfaction and reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy but when it comes to tangibles, an insignificant difference was evident. When stakeholders were categorized by campus, there was a substantial variation in the level of satisfaction and service quality parameters, significant differences existed on reliability, responsiveness, tangibles, and empathy, while in terms of assurance, students’ satisfaction was similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡皮斯州立大学利益相关者满意度指数:提高服务质量的洞察
研究确定了利益相关者对优质服务交付提升维度的满意程度。它涵盖了涉众对可靠性、保证、有形、移情和响应的满意度。结果表明,利益相关者在服务质量维度上的满意度高于服务质量标准,尤其是在保证和同理心方面,而在可靠性和响应性方面高于最低标准,而在有形性方面的可比性较低。研究表明,服务质量的高表现为人员的友好、对任务的熟悉、文件和信息的更新、资源的可用性、礼貌、及时履行承诺的服务以及使利益相关者感到安心和安全。结果在服务的可靠性和质量方面,记录和数据准确,保存安全,随时可用,人员提供明确的信息和问题的替代解决方案方面获得了很高的利益相关者满意度。利益相关者对回应的满意度高于平均水平,除了客户的不安全感,客户的需求被听到,服务及时,足够礼貌,以及为客户安排了获取文件的时间。有形服务质量得分较高,同理心得分一般。此外,受访者的满意度水平与可靠性、反应性、保证性和同理心之间存在显著差异,但在有形方面,差异不显著。在以校园为分类的利益相关者中,满意度水平和服务质量参数存在较大差异,在可靠性、响应性、有形和移情方面存在显著差异,而在保证方面,学生的满意度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
New accounting standards and the performance of quantitative investors Does transparency about banks’ lending costs lower firms’ borrowing costs? Evidence from India In search of a unicorn: Dynamic agency with endogenous investment opportunities The unicorn quest: Deriving empirical predictions from theory Financial statements not required
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1