Structure, Validity and Cut-Off Scores for the APA Emerging Measure ofDSM-5 Social Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (SAD-D)

Kylie Rice, N. Schutte, A. Rock, Clara V Murray
{"title":"Structure, Validity and Cut-Off Scores for the APA Emerging Measure ofDSM-5 Social Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (SAD-D)","authors":"Kylie Rice, N. Schutte, A. Rock, Clara V Murray","doi":"10.35248/2167-1044.21.10.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The APA Emerging measure the Social Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (SAD-D) is recognized as the only social anxiety scale that is based on the DSM-5 criteria. This scale also addresses the limitations of other social anxiety measures as it is dimensional, time efficient and assesses a broad range of symptoms. However, research in community samples is needed, and no research to date has investigated the use of the SAD-D in an Australian sample. As such, this study examined the factor structure and validity of the SAD-D in an Australian non-clinical sample (N=999), and provides criterion cut off scores. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the scale assesses a unidimensional construct of social anxiety severity. Post-hoc analyses also suggested that the 10-item SAD-D scale could be shortened to a six-item scale. Both the original SAD-D-10 scale and the SAD-D-6 scale showed good internal consistency with alphas of 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. Both scales showed evidence of concurrent validity through statistically significant associations of social anxiety severity scores with general anxiety and fear of negative evaluation by others. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the SAD-D-10 and SAD-D-6 were significant predictors of fear of negative evaluation. This analysis also provided test cut-off scores that may be usefully applied in practice, and as a criterion cut-off score in research. The results of this research suggest that the SAD-D-10 scale and the new SAD-D-6 scale may have utility in both research and practice settings, as the only social anxiety measure that is based on the DSM-5 criteria and overcomes the limitations of other measures.","PeriodicalId":15532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of depression & anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of depression & anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-1044.21.10.406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The APA Emerging measure the Social Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (SAD-D) is recognized as the only social anxiety scale that is based on the DSM-5 criteria. This scale also addresses the limitations of other social anxiety measures as it is dimensional, time efficient and assesses a broad range of symptoms. However, research in community samples is needed, and no research to date has investigated the use of the SAD-D in an Australian sample. As such, this study examined the factor structure and validity of the SAD-D in an Australian non-clinical sample (N=999), and provides criterion cut off scores. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the scale assesses a unidimensional construct of social anxiety severity. Post-hoc analyses also suggested that the 10-item SAD-D scale could be shortened to a six-item scale. Both the original SAD-D-10 scale and the SAD-D-6 scale showed good internal consistency with alphas of 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. Both scales showed evidence of concurrent validity through statistically significant associations of social anxiety severity scores with general anxiety and fear of negative evaluation by others. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the SAD-D-10 and SAD-D-6 were significant predictors of fear of negative evaluation. This analysis also provided test cut-off scores that may be usefully applied in practice, and as a criterion cut-off score in research. The results of this research suggest that the SAD-D-10 scale and the new SAD-D-6 scale may have utility in both research and practice settings, as the only social anxiety measure that is based on the DSM-5 criteria and overcomes the limitations of other measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
dsm -5社交焦虑障碍严重程度量表(SAD-D)的结构、效度和分值
APA新兴测量社交焦虑障碍严重程度量表(SAD-D)被认为是唯一基于DSM-5标准的社交焦虑量表。该量表还解决了其他社交焦虑测量方法的局限性,因为它具有维度、时间效率和评估范围广泛的症状。然而,需要对社区样本进行研究,迄今为止还没有研究调查过在澳大利亚样本中使用SAD-D。因此,本研究在澳大利亚非临床样本(N=999)中检验了SAD-D的因素结构和有效性,并提供了标准截断分数。探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析结果表明,该量表评估的是社会焦虑严重程度的单向度结构。事后分析还表明,10项SAD-D量表可以缩短为6项量表。原SAD-D-10量表和SAD-D-6量表均表现出较好的内部一致性,alpha值分别为0.95和0.93。社交焦虑严重程度得分与一般焦虑和对他人负面评价的恐惧之间存在显著的统计学关联,两种量表均显示出并发效度的证据。接受操作者特征曲线分析表明,SAD-D-10和SAD-D-6是负面评价恐惧的显著预测因子。该分析还提供了可用于实践的测试截止分数,并可作为研究中的标准截止分数。本研究结果表明,SAD-D-10量表和新的SAD-D-6量表作为唯一基于DSM-5标准的社交焦虑测量,克服了其他测量方法的局限性,在研究和实践环境中都可能具有实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Treatment Utilization of Patients Diagnosed with Depression and Anxiety Disorders Based on Kentucky Medicaid 2012-2019 Datasets. The Association Between Gratitude and Depression: A Meta-Analysis Submission Anxiety: ORCID, Publons, Cabell's, APC, Index Factor, Open Access, "Predatory" and Wait Time (As Well as Other Things) The Role of Pets in the Mental Health Implications of the COVD-19 Pandemic Managing Anxiety and Stress Holistically: Vedic Wisdom from the Purna Health Management System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1