PECULIARITIES OF THE EU`S SOFT POWER STRATEGY TOWARDS UKRAINE

O. Brusylovska, V. T. Khakimova
{"title":"PECULIARITIES OF THE EU`S SOFT POWER STRATEGY TOWARDS UKRAINE","authors":"O. Brusylovska, V. T. Khakimova","doi":"10.18524/2707-5206.2021.34.237502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proclaiming a new world order, the leaders of Western states provided for the expansion of peace and stability by assisting with Europeanization and the integration of Central and Eastern Europe. However, the situation with Ukraine is more complicated. The aim of the paper is revealing of the EU’s soft power peculiarities towards Ukraine. The methodology is based on studies of Joseph Nye and the USC Centre of Public Diplomacy. Both have been adapted and implemented to the aims of the current study. The most important questions are: What makes the EU attractive abroad? To what extent does the EU rely on its attractiveness in its relations with Ukraine? What prevents the EU from more effectively pursuing its soft power policy towards Ukraine? \nAs a result of this work, it became clear that the EU's influence on Ukraine and in particular on the solution of the current conflict with Russia was insignificant. This is a paradox if we consider the individual characteristics of both actors. The EU still loses to Russia in digital diplomacy. However, in terms of the attractiveness of cultural achievements, the strength of the EU is about the same as that of Russia. The strength of the diplomatic network, its contribution to global interaction in the case of the EU is relatively higher than that of Russia. Finally, the EU's strength is much higher than that of Russia in terms of the attractive economic model, business friendliness, and ability to innovate; by the level of human capital, contribution to scholarships, and attractiveness for international students; in the context of a commitment to freedom, human rights and democracy, and the quality of political institutions. In the future, it is necessary to conduct a study of this phenomenon and find out what affects the EU's inability to use its soft power advantages effectively.","PeriodicalId":38327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2707-5206.2021.34.237502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proclaiming a new world order, the leaders of Western states provided for the expansion of peace and stability by assisting with Europeanization and the integration of Central and Eastern Europe. However, the situation with Ukraine is more complicated. The aim of the paper is revealing of the EU’s soft power peculiarities towards Ukraine. The methodology is based on studies of Joseph Nye and the USC Centre of Public Diplomacy. Both have been adapted and implemented to the aims of the current study. The most important questions are: What makes the EU attractive abroad? To what extent does the EU rely on its attractiveness in its relations with Ukraine? What prevents the EU from more effectively pursuing its soft power policy towards Ukraine? As a result of this work, it became clear that the EU's influence on Ukraine and in particular on the solution of the current conflict with Russia was insignificant. This is a paradox if we consider the individual characteristics of both actors. The EU still loses to Russia in digital diplomacy. However, in terms of the attractiveness of cultural achievements, the strength of the EU is about the same as that of Russia. The strength of the diplomatic network, its contribution to global interaction in the case of the EU is relatively higher than that of Russia. Finally, the EU's strength is much higher than that of Russia in terms of the attractive economic model, business friendliness, and ability to innovate; by the level of human capital, contribution to scholarships, and attractiveness for international students; in the context of a commitment to freedom, human rights and democracy, and the quality of political institutions. In the future, it is necessary to conduct a study of this phenomenon and find out what affects the EU's inability to use its soft power advantages effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟对乌克兰软实力战略的特殊性
西方国家的领导人宣布了新的世界秩序,通过协助欧洲化和中欧和东欧的一体化,提供了和平与稳定的扩展。然而,乌克兰的局势更为复杂。本文旨在揭示欧盟对乌克兰软实力的特殊性。该方法基于约瑟夫·奈和南加州大学公共外交中心的研究。两者都已适应和实施,以达到当前研究的目的。最重要的问题是:是什么让欧盟在海外具有吸引力?在与乌克兰的关系中,欧盟在多大程度上依赖于自身的吸引力?是什么阻碍了欧盟对乌克兰更有效地推行软实力政策?由于这项工作,很明显,欧盟对乌克兰的影响,特别是对解决目前与俄罗斯的冲突的影响是微不足道的。如果我们考虑到两个演员的个人特征,这是一个悖论。在数字外交方面,欧盟仍然输给了俄罗斯。然而,就文化成果的吸引力而言,欧盟的实力与俄罗斯大致相当。外交网络的强度,其对全球互动的贡献在欧盟的情况下相对高于俄罗斯。最后,在吸引人的经济模式、商业友好和创新能力方面,欧盟的实力远远高于俄罗斯;人力资本水平、对奖学金的贡献以及对国际学生的吸引力;在对自由、人权和民主以及政治机构质量的承诺的背景下。在未来,有必要对这一现象进行研究,找出欧盟无法有效利用其软实力优势的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politikayı Yeniden Düşünmenin Bir İmkânı Olarak Jacques Rancière’de Politik Özneleşme Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Afet Yönetimindeki Rolü: 6 Şubat Depremi Hatay Örneği Türkiye İşçi Partisi’nin İnşa ve Gelişimini Tetikleyen Koşullar (1960 – 1966) Adil Düzen Kavramı Bağlamında Necmettin Erbakan’ın Dış Politika Anlayışı Alimcan Ablet, Çin-İsrail İlişkileri, İstanbul: İyidüşün Yayınları, (Mayıs 2021), ss. 208.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1