Feasibility of Student Worksheets based on Critical Thinking Skills on the Topic of Heat and Temperature

Yenny Warnida, M. Zaini, S. Suyidno
{"title":"Feasibility of Student Worksheets based on Critical Thinking Skills on the Topic of Heat and Temperature","authors":"Yenny Warnida, M. Zaini, S. Suyidno","doi":"10.20527/jipf.v7i1.7496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the industrial era 4.0, critical thinking is indispensable in dealing with various daily life problems. However, these skills are less practised in schools. Therefore, this study aims to produce feasible worksheets to train students' critical thinking skills on temperature and heat. Five worksheets are developed: solid expansion, liquid expansion, gas expansion, heat and Black's principle. The research design used Tessmer's formative evaluation, including self-evaluation, expert review, individual trials, small group trials, and field trials. The validity of the worksheet was obtained through assessment by three experts and two science learning practitioners. Individual tests on three students, small group tests on nine students, and field tests on 32 students. The results showed: (1) the worksheets are valid because the results of content and construct validation on the five worksheets are 91.88; 92.81; 93.44; 93.75; and 92.81 with very valid categories; and (2) the worksheets are feasible because the content, expected, and actual feasibility scores are 84.44; 87.62, and 86.41 respectively with very good categories. Thus, the worksheets are feasible to use in science learning. These worksheets can be an alternative for educators in increasing the activity of students to improve learning outcomes, especially critical thinking.","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v7i1.7496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the industrial era 4.0, critical thinking is indispensable in dealing with various daily life problems. However, these skills are less practised in schools. Therefore, this study aims to produce feasible worksheets to train students' critical thinking skills on temperature and heat. Five worksheets are developed: solid expansion, liquid expansion, gas expansion, heat and Black's principle. The research design used Tessmer's formative evaluation, including self-evaluation, expert review, individual trials, small group trials, and field trials. The validity of the worksheet was obtained through assessment by three experts and two science learning practitioners. Individual tests on three students, small group tests on nine students, and field tests on 32 students. The results showed: (1) the worksheets are valid because the results of content and construct validation on the five worksheets are 91.88; 92.81; 93.44; 93.75; and 92.81 with very valid categories; and (2) the worksheets are feasible because the content, expected, and actual feasibility scores are 84.44; 87.62, and 86.41 respectively with very good categories. Thus, the worksheets are feasible to use in science learning. These worksheets can be an alternative for educators in increasing the activity of students to improve learning outcomes, especially critical thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于热与温度主题的批判性思维技能的学生工作表的可行性
在工业4.0时代,在处理各种日常生活问题时,批判性思维必不可少。然而,这些技能在学校很少得到实践。因此,本研究旨在制作可行的工作表,以训练学生对温度和热量的批判性思维能力。开发了五个工作表:固体膨胀、液体膨胀、气体膨胀、热和布莱克原理。研究设计采用Tessmer的形成性评价,包括自我评价、专家评审、个体试验、小组试验和现场试验。工作表的效度由三位专家和两位科学学习实践者进行评估。3名学生参加了个人测试,9名学生参加了小组测试,32名学生参加了现场测试。结果表明:(1)5份工作表的内容效度和结构效度均为91.88,是有效的;92.81;93.44;93.75;92.81个类别非常有效;(2)工作表内容可行性、预期可行性和实际可行性得分均为84.44分,具有可行性;87.62, 86.41,类别非常好。因此,工作表在科学学习中是可行的。这些工作表可以作为教育工作者的另一种选择,增加学生的活动,以提高学习成果,特别是批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of Increasing Students’ Critical Thinking in the Guided Discovery Learning Model on Light Waves An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning REACT Learning on the Topic of Elasticity to Enhance Students' Analytical Abilities The Effect of Ethnoscience-Based Science Environment Technology Society (SETS) Learning Model in Learning Physics and Biology Is 21st Century Learning Need STEM Approach built into Physics Comics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1