Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Milk

W. Chaalal, H. Aggad, K. Zidane, N. Saidi, M. Kihal
{"title":"Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Milk","authors":"W. Chaalal, H. Aggad, K. Zidane, N. Saidi, M. Kihal","doi":"10.9734/bmrj/2016/24064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study investigated the occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in milk and its sensitivity to twenty antibiotics. Study Design: The research was laboratory-based investigation. and of the Study: The study carried between September 2012 and May 2013. Methodology: Thirty eight milk specimens were collected from cattle and examined to estimate the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus . The sensitivity of the isolates to twenty (20) antibiotics was evaluated and the presence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was also determined. S. aureus was characterized using standard microbiological methods and confirmation was done using the API Staph Identification System. Antibiotic sensitivity of isolates was evaluated by means of agar diffusion technique while the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was established using broth dilution technique for oxacillin, E-test for tetracyclin, and chloramphenicol respectively. Results: 55.26% of analyzed samples were contaminated with S. aureus . 100% of Methicillin Sensitive S. aureus were resistant to nalidixic acid, 70% to bacitracin, 65% to spiramycin, and 45% to penicillin and fosfomycin. There was no resistance to vancomycin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin and pristamycin among isolates. A total of 76% of the isolated strains were found to be resistant to at least 4 antibiotics. One Methicillin Resistant S. aureus strain (4.76%) was detected and showed multiple drug resistance. This resistance was crossed with all beta lactams and its resistance profile to macrolides was constitutive (MLSB const) while aminoglycosides phenotype was ANT (4’) (4’’). Conclusion: A high prevalence of S. aureus with multiple drug resistance was established. Improved food safety measures are thus necessary to prevent transmission and spread of antimicrobial resistance by these pathogens.","PeriodicalId":9269,"journal":{"name":"British microbiology research journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British microbiology research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bmrj/2016/24064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Aims: This study investigated the occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in milk and its sensitivity to twenty antibiotics. Study Design: The research was laboratory-based investigation. and of the Study: The study carried between September 2012 and May 2013. Methodology: Thirty eight milk specimens were collected from cattle and examined to estimate the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus . The sensitivity of the isolates to twenty (20) antibiotics was evaluated and the presence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was also determined. S. aureus was characterized using standard microbiological methods and confirmation was done using the API Staph Identification System. Antibiotic sensitivity of isolates was evaluated by means of agar diffusion technique while the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was established using broth dilution technique for oxacillin, E-test for tetracyclin, and chloramphenicol respectively. Results: 55.26% of analyzed samples were contaminated with S. aureus . 100% of Methicillin Sensitive S. aureus were resistant to nalidixic acid, 70% to bacitracin, 65% to spiramycin, and 45% to penicillin and fosfomycin. There was no resistance to vancomycin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin and pristamycin among isolates. A total of 76% of the isolated strains were found to be resistant to at least 4 antibiotics. One Methicillin Resistant S. aureus strain (4.76%) was detected and showed multiple drug resistance. This resistance was crossed with all beta lactams and its resistance profile to macrolides was constitutive (MLSB const) while aminoglycosides phenotype was ANT (4’) (4’’). Conclusion: A high prevalence of S. aureus with multiple drug resistance was established. Improved food safety measures are thus necessary to prevent transmission and spread of antimicrobial resistance by these pathogens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳中金黄色葡萄球菌的药敏分析
目的:研究牛奶中金黄色葡萄球菌的发生情况及其对20种抗生素的敏感性。研究设计:本研究为实验室调查。以及该研究:该研究于2012年9月至2013年5月进行。方法:从牛身上收集了38份牛奶标本,并对其进行了检查,以估计金黄色葡萄球菌的患病率。评估了分离株对20种抗生素的敏感性,并确定了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的存在。采用标准微生物学方法对金黄色葡萄球菌进行鉴定,并采用API葡萄球菌鉴定系统进行鉴定。采用琼脂扩散法对分离菌株进行抗生素敏感性评价,采用肉汤稀释法对奥西林、四环素和氯霉素分别建立最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果:55.26%的分析样品感染金黄色葡萄球菌。甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌对萘啶酸耐药率为100%,对杆菌肽耐药率为70%,对螺旋霉素耐药率为65%,对青霉素和磷霉素耐药率为45%。对万古霉素、氯霉素、庆大霉素和普司他霉素均无耐药。共有76%的分离菌株被发现对至少4种抗生素具有耐药性。检出1株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(4.76%),呈多重耐药。该抗性与所有β内酰胺杂交,其对大环内酯类的抗性谱为组成型(MLSB const),而氨基糖苷类的表型为ANT(4’)(4’)。结论:金黄色葡萄球菌具有较高的流行率和多重耐药特征。因此,有必要改进食品安全措施,以防止这些病原体传播和传播抗微生物药物耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Molecular Detection of Pathogenic Vibrio Species among Economic Fish from Red Sea in Egypt Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Wound Swabs of Patients Attending a Public Hospital in Warri Delta State, Nigeria Role of Three Different Laboratory Tests in Demonstrating Sensitization to Various Allergens in Common Atopic Disorders Molecular Identification, Bioactivity Screening and Metabolic Fingerprinting of the Actinomycetes of Chenab River Sediments Antibacterial Activity of Lactobacillus spp and Lactococcus spp Isolated from Various Parts of Pebbly Fish, Alestes baremoze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1