Letter to the Editor: Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19: Are Women Different?

A. Kapoor
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19: Are Women Different?","authors":"A. Kapoor","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1746420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I read with interest the article 1 about therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and considerations in women. I applaud the authors for performing rigorous review to address this important clinical concern in COVID-19. High prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed in 22.7% of patients in intensive care units. 2 Observational studies and initial autopsy series showed high rates of both venous and arterial thrombosis as well as prominent pulmonary microvascular thrombosis. Patients with COVID-19 were reported to have 6% more risk to develop VTE as compared to non-COVID-19 patients. 3 In addition, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy was recognized as a marker of disease severity and poor prognosis. Contrasting results have been reported about the pre-ferred anticoagulation therapy in patients with COVID-19 infection. As evident in the given article, 1 the recommenda-tions by various societies and guidelines kept on changing as the evidence emerged. Elevated D-dimer levels were reported as predictive for breakthrough thrombosis 4 despite standard deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Some institu-tions started risk-stratifying patients for VTE based on the D-dimer cutoff points and started intermediate-dose prophy-laxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. 5 Follow-up studies have con fi rmed signi fi cant coagulopathy associated with severe COVID-19, characterized by marked elevation of fi brinogen, von Willebrand factor, and platelet and profound endothelia","PeriodicalId":92905,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1746420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I read with interest the article 1 about therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and considerations in women. I applaud the authors for performing rigorous review to address this important clinical concern in COVID-19. High prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed in 22.7% of patients in intensive care units. 2 Observational studies and initial autopsy series showed high rates of both venous and arterial thrombosis as well as prominent pulmonary microvascular thrombosis. Patients with COVID-19 were reported to have 6% more risk to develop VTE as compared to non-COVID-19 patients. 3 In addition, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy was recognized as a marker of disease severity and poor prognosis. Contrasting results have been reported about the pre-ferred anticoagulation therapy in patients with COVID-19 infection. As evident in the given article, 1 the recommenda-tions by various societies and guidelines kept on changing as the evidence emerged. Elevated D-dimer levels were reported as predictive for breakthrough thrombosis 4 despite standard deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Some institu-tions started risk-stratifying patients for VTE based on the D-dimer cutoff points and started intermediate-dose prophy-laxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. 5 Follow-up studies have con fi rmed signi fi cant coagulopathy associated with severe COVID-19, characterized by marked elevation of fi brinogen, von Willebrand factor, and platelet and profound endothelia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致编辑的信:2019冠状病毒病静脉血栓栓塞:女性不同吗?
我饶有兴趣地阅读了关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者治疗性抗凝治疗及女性注意事项的文章1。我赞赏作者为解决COVID-19这一重要临床问题而进行的严格审查。22.7%的重症监护病房患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率高。2观察性研究和初步尸检系列显示静脉和动脉血栓形成率很高,肺微血管血栓形成也很突出。据报道,与非COVID-19患者相比,COVID-19患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险高出6%。3此外,covid -19相关凝血功能障碍被认为是疾病严重程度和预后不良的标志。已有报道对比了COVID-19感染患者首选抗凝治疗的结果。正如上述文章所示,随着证据的出现,各种协会和指导方针的建议也在不断变化。据报道,尽管有标准的深静脉血栓预防措施,但d -二聚体水平升高仍可预测突破性血栓形成。一些机构开始根据d -二聚体截断点对静脉血栓栓塞患者进行风险分层,并开始对COVID-19危重患者进行中剂量预防。5 .随访研究证实重症COVID-19患者存在显著凝血功能障碍,其特征为血凝素、血管性血友病因子、血小板和深度内皮明显升高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Right Heart Catheterization-Revisited Assessment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease Relationship between Serum Sex Hormones and Coronary Artery Disease in Premenopausal Women – A Missing Link? A Rare Case of Postpartum Native Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis with Septic Pulmonary Embolization Gender Specific Difference and Clinical Spectrum of COVID-19 Patients Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospital of Northern India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1