Marx’s non-speciesist concept of labour

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Capital and Class Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1177/03098168221145453
Michael Sommer, Christian Stache
{"title":"Marx’s non-speciesist concept of labour","authors":"Michael Sommer, Christian Stache","doi":"10.1177/03098168221145453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human–animal scholars have repeatedly accused Marx of standing in the tradition of a Cartesian human–animal dualism. One central piece of evidence brought forward to substantiate the attack is Marx’s concept of labour. The present article, however, argues that Marx’s conceptualisation of labour is actually non-speciesist and recognises non-waged and other than human forms of labour as well without renouncing qualitative distinctions between them. For Marx, both useful labour and the historically specific capitalist form of social labour cannot be reduced to something peculiar to man. Useful labour encompasses a wide range of ways to transform nature. Due to the bourgeois social relations, capitalist social labour is instead limited to human productive wage labour, excluding numerous types of human labour as well as animal labour. Thus, his concept of labour proves that Marx is not just another ‘speciesist’ scholar in the long Western tradition of philosophy.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"178 1","pages":"469 - 490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital and Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168221145453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human–animal scholars have repeatedly accused Marx of standing in the tradition of a Cartesian human–animal dualism. One central piece of evidence brought forward to substantiate the attack is Marx’s concept of labour. The present article, however, argues that Marx’s conceptualisation of labour is actually non-speciesist and recognises non-waged and other than human forms of labour as well without renouncing qualitative distinctions between them. For Marx, both useful labour and the historically specific capitalist form of social labour cannot be reduced to something peculiar to man. Useful labour encompasses a wide range of ways to transform nature. Due to the bourgeois social relations, capitalist social labour is instead limited to human productive wage labour, excluding numerous types of human labour as well as animal labour. Thus, his concept of labour proves that Marx is not just another ‘speciesist’ scholar in the long Western tradition of philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克思的非物种主义劳动概念
人与动物学者一再指责马克思站在笛卡尔式人与动物二元论的传统中。支持这种攻击的一个核心证据是马克思的劳动概念。然而,本文认为,马克思的劳动概念实际上是非物种主义的,并且承认非有偿劳动和人类以外的劳动形式,同时也没有放弃它们之间的质的区别。对马克思来说,有用劳动和历史上特定的资本主义形式的社会劳动都不能简化为人类特有的东西。有用劳动包括改变自然的各种方法。由于资产阶级的社会关系,资本主义社会劳动只限于人类的生产性雇佣劳动,不包括各种各样的人类劳动和动物劳动。因此,他的劳动概念证明了马克思不仅仅是西方悠久的哲学传统中的另一个“物种主义”学者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Capital and Class
Capital and Class POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
From solidarity to self-promotion? Neoliberalism and left politics in the age of the social media influencer Marx’s Capital and the concept of super-exploitation Judging automation: Towards a normative critical theory ‘Good morning Metro shoppers!’ Food insecurity, COVID-19 and the emergence of roll-call neoliberalism Book review: Hope in Hopeless Times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1