Variation in the Use of Basic Behavioral Management Techniques in General and Pediatric Dental Practice: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1177/23202068221103983
Osama Felemban, Ruba A. Baamer, Zuhor Bukhari, K. Baghlaf, M. Aldajani, Ohoud Sijini
{"title":"Variation in the Use of Basic Behavioral Management Techniques in General and Pediatric Dental Practice: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Osama Felemban, Ruba A. Baamer, Zuhor Bukhari, K. Baghlaf, M. Aldajani, Ohoud Sijini","doi":"10.1177/23202068221103983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Basic guidance on nonpharmacological behavioral management techniques in dental practice is fundamental for the effective treatment of pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance in general and specialist pediatric dentists and to evaluate the perceived difference in their effectiveness across hospital clinics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study with a nonpurposive sample of 179 registered general and pediatric dentists in the Saudi Dental Society based in Jeddah in 2019. Participants were contacted and asked to complete a validated questionnaire. The first section of the questionnaire comprised questions on demographic data and the second section investigated the frequency of the use of various behavioral management techniques. Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentages) and inferential statistics were used. Results: A total of 109 participants completed the survey; 52 were general dentists and 57 were pediatric dentists. The techniques tell–show–do (P = .018), positive reinforcement (P = .004), distraction (P = .001), and nonverbal communication (P = .001) were used more frequently by pediatric dentists than general dentists, and there were statistically significant differences. Also, pediatric dentists reported that the techniques tell–show–do (P = 0.035), positive reinforcement (P = .026), distraction (P = .011), and nonverbal communication (P = .007) were highly effective more often than general dentists did. Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were found between general and pediatric dentists in the use of basic behavioral management techniques. Broadly, general dentists used fewer behavior guidance techniques compared to pediatric dentists. More pediatric dentists reported that behavioral management techniques were effective in comparison to general dentists.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"93 1","pages":"225 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068221103983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Basic guidance on nonpharmacological behavioral management techniques in dental practice is fundamental for the effective treatment of pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance in general and specialist pediatric dentists and to evaluate the perceived difference in their effectiveness across hospital clinics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study with a nonpurposive sample of 179 registered general and pediatric dentists in the Saudi Dental Society based in Jeddah in 2019. Participants were contacted and asked to complete a validated questionnaire. The first section of the questionnaire comprised questions on demographic data and the second section investigated the frequency of the use of various behavioral management techniques. Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentages) and inferential statistics were used. Results: A total of 109 participants completed the survey; 52 were general dentists and 57 were pediatric dentists. The techniques tell–show–do (P = .018), positive reinforcement (P = .004), distraction (P = .001), and nonverbal communication (P = .001) were used more frequently by pediatric dentists than general dentists, and there were statistically significant differences. Also, pediatric dentists reported that the techniques tell–show–do (P = 0.035), positive reinforcement (P = .026), distraction (P = .011), and nonverbal communication (P = .007) were highly effective more often than general dentists did. Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were found between general and pediatric dentists in the use of basic behavioral management techniques. Broadly, general dentists used fewer behavior guidance techniques compared to pediatric dentists. More pediatric dentists reported that behavioral management techniques were effective in comparison to general dentists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在普通和儿童牙科实践中使用基本行为管理技术的差异:一项横断面研究
目的:牙科临床非药物行为管理技术的基本指导是有效治疗儿科患者的基础。本研究的目的是比较普通儿科牙医和专科儿科牙医使用基本非药物行为指导的情况,并评估沙特阿拉伯吉达各医院诊所在其有效性方面的感知差异。材料和方法:2019年在吉达的沙特牙科协会对179名注册普通牙医和儿科牙医进行了无目的样本横断面研究。参与者被联系并被要求完成一份有效的问卷。调查表的第一部分包括关于人口统计数据的问题,第二部分调查了使用各种行为管理技术的频率。采用描述性统计(频率和百分比)和推断性统计。结果:共109名参与者完成调查;52名是普通牙医,57名是儿科牙医。儿童牙医使用“告诉-展示-做”(P = 0.018)、“正强化”(P = 0.004)、“分心”(P = 0.001)和非语言交流(P = 0.001)的频率高于普通牙医,差异有统计学意义。此外,儿科牙医报告说,告诉-展示-做(P = 0.035)、积极强化(P = 0.026)、分散注意力(P = 0.011)和非语言交流(P = 0.07)等技术比普通牙医更有效。结论:普通牙医和儿科牙医在使用基本行为管理技术方面存在统计学上的显著差异。总的来说,与儿科牙医相比,普通牙医使用的行为指导技巧更少。更多的儿科牙医报告说,与普通牙医相比,行为管理技术更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Outcomes of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) with and Without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) In Direct Pulp Capping: A Clinical Pilot Study Mineralized Collagen Fiber-based Dental Implant: Novel Perspectives Do Polishing Methods and Colorant Beverages Affect the Color Stainability of 3D-printed Permanent Restorations? The Intraoral Findings of the Patient with Robinow Syndrome and the Related Dental Treatment Approaches: A Case Report Effect of Bleaching on the Microhardness and Modulus of Elasticity of ACTIVA BioACTIVE – RESTORATIVE: An In Vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1