Evidence for flexible navigation strategies during spatial learning involving path choices

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Spatial Cognition and Computation Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/13875868.2022.2158090
Stephanie Doner, Jingyi Zheng, Andrew S. McAvan, Michael J. Starrett, R. Campbell, Delaney Sanders, Arne D. Ekstrom
{"title":"Evidence for flexible navigation strategies during spatial learning involving path choices","authors":"Stephanie Doner, Jingyi Zheng, Andrew S. McAvan, Michael J. Starrett, R. Campbell, Delaney Sanders, Arne D. Ekstrom","doi":"10.1080/13875868.2022.2158090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a classic study in 1946, Tolman et al. found that rodents chose the optimal path to a hidden goal location when given the option to take a shortcut. Subsequent studies, though, found mixed results, including a previous study in humans showing non-optimal response strategies. Here, we tested human participants in a virtual sunburst maze identical to that employed by Tolman. Across three different experiments, we found that participants consistently employed non-optimal response strategies involving either following the encoded route or using the light as a beacon cue. Adding distal boundary cues (Experiment 2) or enhancing idiothetic cues (Experiment 3) led to the same overall results. Our findings suggest participants’ search strategies are often suboptimal when given the opportunity to spontaneously take a short cut.","PeriodicalId":46199,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Cognition and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Cognition and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2022.2158090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a classic study in 1946, Tolman et al. found that rodents chose the optimal path to a hidden goal location when given the option to take a shortcut. Subsequent studies, though, found mixed results, including a previous study in humans showing non-optimal response strategies. Here, we tested human participants in a virtual sunburst maze identical to that employed by Tolman. Across three different experiments, we found that participants consistently employed non-optimal response strategies involving either following the encoded route or using the light as a beacon cue. Adding distal boundary cues (Experiment 2) or enhancing idiothetic cues (Experiment 3) led to the same overall results. Our findings suggest participants’ search strategies are often suboptimal when given the opportunity to spontaneously take a short cut.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间学习中灵活导航策略的证据包括路径选择
在1946年的一项经典研究中,Tolman等人发现,当啮齿类动物可以选择走捷径时,它们会选择通往隐藏目标位置的最优路径。然而,随后的研究发现了不同的结果,包括先前对人类的研究显示出非最佳反应策略。在这里,我们在一个与托尔曼所使用的相同的虚拟太阳爆发迷宫中测试人类参与者。在三个不同的实验中,我们发现参与者始终采用非最佳反应策略,包括遵循编码路线或使用灯光作为信标提示。添加远端边界线索(实验2)或增强固有线索(实验3)的总体结果相同。我们的研究结果表明,当参与者有机会自发地走捷径时,他们的搜索策略往往不是最优的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Spatial Cognition and Computation PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
In memoriam: Christian Freksa (1950-2020) Treat robots as humans? Perspective choice in human-human and human-robot spatial language interaction Direction information is more influential than distance information in memory for location relative to landmarks Task-dependent sketch maps Evidence for flexible navigation strategies during spatial learning involving path choices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1