Comparison of shoulder external rotation fatigue protocols on kinetic determinants and fatigue index in overhead athletes: a cross over study

IF 0.6 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Comparative Exercise Physiology Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.3920/cep220045
R. Ali, I. Ali, S. Sharma
{"title":"Comparison of shoulder external rotation fatigue protocols on kinetic determinants and fatigue index in overhead athletes: a cross over study","authors":"R. Ali, I. Ali, S. Sharma","doi":"10.3920/cep220045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of present study is to compare prone lying and half kneeling external rotator fatigue protocols on the kinetic parameters of external rotators and fatigue index in collegiate overhead athletes. Twenty overhead collegiate male athletes were recruited in this randomised cross-over experimental study design with two different shoulder external rotator fatigue protocols. Subjects were performed with prone lying and half kneeling shoulder external rotation fatigue protocol with a washout period of at least 72 h. Outcome measures like peak force, peak velocity, peak power, average power, and total work were observed in concentric and eccentric contraction and fatigue index was assessed before and after fatigue protocols. Concentric peak force (P=0.001), peak velocity (P<0.001), peak power (P<0.001), average power (P<0.001) and total work (P=0.022) showed significant time difference whereas group difference and time× group interaction was found to be non-significant. Similarly, eccentric peak force (P=0.043), average power (P=0.001) and total work (P=0.032) showed only significant time difference. Prone-lying and half kneeling external rotation fatigue protocols reduces the peak force, peak velocity, peak power and total work in concentric contraction and peak force and total work in eccentric contraction in a similar fashion.","PeriodicalId":10709,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of present study is to compare prone lying and half kneeling external rotator fatigue protocols on the kinetic parameters of external rotators and fatigue index in collegiate overhead athletes. Twenty overhead collegiate male athletes were recruited in this randomised cross-over experimental study design with two different shoulder external rotator fatigue protocols. Subjects were performed with prone lying and half kneeling shoulder external rotation fatigue protocol with a washout period of at least 72 h. Outcome measures like peak force, peak velocity, peak power, average power, and total work were observed in concentric and eccentric contraction and fatigue index was assessed before and after fatigue protocols. Concentric peak force (P=0.001), peak velocity (P<0.001), peak power (P<0.001), average power (P<0.001) and total work (P=0.022) showed significant time difference whereas group difference and time× group interaction was found to be non-significant. Similarly, eccentric peak force (P=0.043), average power (P=0.001) and total work (P=0.032) showed only significant time difference. Prone-lying and half kneeling external rotation fatigue protocols reduces the peak force, peak velocity, peak power and total work in concentric contraction and peak force and total work in eccentric contraction in a similar fashion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较肩外旋疲劳协议的动力学决定因素和疲劳指数在头顶运动员:交叉研究
本研究的目的是比较俯卧和半跪的外旋体疲劳方案对大学生头顶运动员外旋体动力学参数和疲劳指数的影响。采用两种不同的肩外旋肌疲劳方案,招募了20名头顶大学男性运动员进行随机交叉实验研究。受试者采用俯卧和半跪肩外旋疲劳方案,洗期至少72小时。观察同心和偏心收缩时的峰值力、峰值速度、峰值功率、平均功率和总功等指标,并评估疲劳方案前后的疲劳指数。同心峰值力(P=0.001)、峰值速度(P<0.001)、峰值功率(P<0.001)、平均功率(P<0.001)和总功(P=0.022)具有显著的时间差异,而组差异和时间×组交互作用无显著性。同样,偏心峰值力(P=0.043)、平均功率(P=0.001)和总功(P=0.032)只有显著的时间差。俯卧和半跪的外旋疲劳方案以类似的方式降低了同心收缩时的峰值力、峰值速度、峰值功率和总功,以及偏心收缩时的峰值力和总功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Exercise Physiology
Comparative Exercise Physiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: ''Comparative Exercise Physiology'' is the only international peer-reviewed scientific journal specifically dealing with the latest research in exercise physiology across all animal species, including humans. The major objective of the journal is to use this comparative approach to better understand the physiological, nutritional, and biochemical parameters that determine levels of performance and athletic achievement. Core subjects include exercise physiology, biomechanics, gait (including the effect of riders in equestrian sport), nutrition and biochemistry, injury and rehabilitation, psychology and behaviour, and breeding and genetics. This comparative and integrative approach to exercise science ultimately highlights the similarities as well as the differences between humans, horses, dogs, and other athletic or non-athletic species during exercise. The result is a unique forum for new information that serves as a resource for all who want to understand the physiological challenges with exercise.
期刊最新文献
Effect of exercise on different factors affecting the immune system The effect of four-weeks of CrossFit workouts on cardiovascular indicators and physical readiness in military forces ICEEP2022 dedicated issue Effect of weight carriage on work effort in horses Basculing in elite show jumping horses: a motion analysis study of trunk and neck movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1