{"title":"Comparison of shoulder external rotation fatigue protocols on kinetic determinants and fatigue index in overhead athletes: a cross over study","authors":"R. Ali, I. Ali, S. Sharma","doi":"10.3920/cep220045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of present study is to compare prone lying and half kneeling external rotator fatigue protocols on the kinetic parameters of external rotators and fatigue index in collegiate overhead athletes. Twenty overhead collegiate male athletes were recruited in this randomised cross-over experimental study design with two different shoulder external rotator fatigue protocols. Subjects were performed with prone lying and half kneeling shoulder external rotation fatigue protocol with a washout period of at least 72 h. Outcome measures like peak force, peak velocity, peak power, average power, and total work were observed in concentric and eccentric contraction and fatigue index was assessed before and after fatigue protocols. Concentric peak force (P=0.001), peak velocity (P<0.001), peak power (P<0.001), average power (P<0.001) and total work (P=0.022) showed significant time difference whereas group difference and time× group interaction was found to be non-significant. Similarly, eccentric peak force (P=0.043), average power (P=0.001) and total work (P=0.032) showed only significant time difference. Prone-lying and half kneeling external rotation fatigue protocols reduces the peak force, peak velocity, peak power and total work in concentric contraction and peak force and total work in eccentric contraction in a similar fashion.","PeriodicalId":10709,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Exercise Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/cep220045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of present study is to compare prone lying and half kneeling external rotator fatigue protocols on the kinetic parameters of external rotators and fatigue index in collegiate overhead athletes. Twenty overhead collegiate male athletes were recruited in this randomised cross-over experimental study design with two different shoulder external rotator fatigue protocols. Subjects were performed with prone lying and half kneeling shoulder external rotation fatigue protocol with a washout period of at least 72 h. Outcome measures like peak force, peak velocity, peak power, average power, and total work were observed in concentric and eccentric contraction and fatigue index was assessed before and after fatigue protocols. Concentric peak force (P=0.001), peak velocity (P<0.001), peak power (P<0.001), average power (P<0.001) and total work (P=0.022) showed significant time difference whereas group difference and time× group interaction was found to be non-significant. Similarly, eccentric peak force (P=0.043), average power (P=0.001) and total work (P=0.032) showed only significant time difference. Prone-lying and half kneeling external rotation fatigue protocols reduces the peak force, peak velocity, peak power and total work in concentric contraction and peak force and total work in eccentric contraction in a similar fashion.
期刊介绍:
''Comparative Exercise Physiology'' is the only international peer-reviewed scientific journal specifically dealing with the latest research in exercise physiology across all animal species, including humans. The major objective of the journal is to use this comparative approach to better understand the physiological, nutritional, and biochemical parameters that determine levels of performance and athletic achievement. Core subjects include exercise physiology, biomechanics, gait (including the effect of riders in equestrian sport), nutrition and biochemistry, injury and rehabilitation, psychology and behaviour, and breeding and genetics. This comparative and integrative approach to exercise science ultimately highlights the similarities as well as the differences between humans, horses, dogs, and other athletic or non-athletic species during exercise. The result is a unique forum for new information that serves as a resource for all who want to understand the physiological challenges with exercise.