Kinetic simulation of electron cyclotron resonance assisted gas breakdown in split-biased waveguides for ITER collective Thomson scattering diagnostic

J. Trieschmann, A. W. Larsen, T. Mussenbrock, S. Korsholm
{"title":"Kinetic simulation of electron cyclotron resonance assisted gas breakdown in split-biased waveguides for ITER collective Thomson scattering diagnostic","authors":"J. Trieschmann, A. W. Larsen, T. Mussenbrock, S. Korsholm","doi":"10.1063/5.0055461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the measurement of the dynamics of fusion-born alpha particles $E_\\alpha \\leq 3.5$ MeV in ITER using collective Thomson scattering (CTS), safe transmission of a gyrotron beam at mm-wavelength (1 MW, 60 GHz) passing the electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) in the in-vessel tokamak `port plug' vacuum is a prerequisite. Depending on neutral gas pressure and composition, ECR-assisted gas breakdown may occur at the location of the resonance, which must be mitigated for diagnostic performance and safety reasons. The concept of a split electrically biased waveguide (SBWG) has been previously demonstrated in [C.P. Moeller, U.S. Patent 4,687,616 (1987)]. The waveguide is longitudinally split and a kV bias voltage applied between the two halves. Electrons are rapidly removed from the central region of high radio frequency electric field strength, mitigating breakdown. As a full scale experimental investigation of gas and electromagnetic field conditions inside the ITER equatorial port plugs is currently unattainable, a corresponding Monte Carlo simulation study is presented. Validity of the Monte Carlo electron model is demonstrated with a prediction of ECR breakdown and the mitigation pressure limits for the above quoted reference case with $^1$H$_2$ (and pollutant high $Z$ elements). For the proposed ITER CTS design with a 88.9 mm inner diameter SBWG, ECR breakdown is predicted to occur down to a pure $^1$H$_2$ pressure of 0.3 Pa, while mitigation is shown to be effective at least up to 10 Pa using a bias voltage of 1 kV. The analysis is complemented by results for relevant electric/magnetic field arrangements and limitations of the SBWG mitigation concept are addressed.","PeriodicalId":8461,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Plasma Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Plasma Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For the measurement of the dynamics of fusion-born alpha particles $E_\alpha \leq 3.5$ MeV in ITER using collective Thomson scattering (CTS), safe transmission of a gyrotron beam at mm-wavelength (1 MW, 60 GHz) passing the electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) in the in-vessel tokamak `port plug' vacuum is a prerequisite. Depending on neutral gas pressure and composition, ECR-assisted gas breakdown may occur at the location of the resonance, which must be mitigated for diagnostic performance and safety reasons. The concept of a split electrically biased waveguide (SBWG) has been previously demonstrated in [C.P. Moeller, U.S. Patent 4,687,616 (1987)]. The waveguide is longitudinally split and a kV bias voltage applied between the two halves. Electrons are rapidly removed from the central region of high radio frequency electric field strength, mitigating breakdown. As a full scale experimental investigation of gas and electromagnetic field conditions inside the ITER equatorial port plugs is currently unattainable, a corresponding Monte Carlo simulation study is presented. Validity of the Monte Carlo electron model is demonstrated with a prediction of ECR breakdown and the mitigation pressure limits for the above quoted reference case with $^1$H$_2$ (and pollutant high $Z$ elements). For the proposed ITER CTS design with a 88.9 mm inner diameter SBWG, ECR breakdown is predicted to occur down to a pure $^1$H$_2$ pressure of 0.3 Pa, while mitigation is shown to be effective at least up to 10 Pa using a bias voltage of 1 kV. The analysis is complemented by results for relevant electric/magnetic field arrangements and limitations of the SBWG mitigation concept are addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裂变偏置波导中电子回旋共振辅助气体击穿的动力学模拟
为了在ITER中使用集体汤姆逊散射(CTS)测量聚变产生的α粒子$E_\alpha \leq 3.5$ MeV的动力学,在容器内托卡马克“端口塞”真空中安全传输波长为mm (1 MW, 60 GHz)的回旋加速器束通过电子回旋共振(ECR)是先决条件。根据中性气体压力和成分的不同,ecr辅助气体击穿可能发生在谐振位置,出于诊断性能和安全原因,必须减轻这种击穿。分离式电偏波导(SBWG)的概念先前已在[C.P.]中得到证明Moeller, U.S. Patent 4,687,616(1987)]。波导纵向分开,在两半之间施加kV偏置电压。电子迅速从高频电场强度高的中心区域移除,减轻击穿。由于目前无法对ITER赤道端口塞内的气体和电磁场条件进行全面的实验研究,因此提出了相应的蒙特卡罗模拟研究。蒙特卡罗电子模型的有效性得到了验证,并对上述参考情况下$^1$ H $_2$(和污染物高$Z$元素)的ECR击穿和缓解压力极限进行了预测。对于具有88.9 mm内径SBWG的ITER CTS设计,预计ECR击穿将发生在0.3 Pa的纯$^1$ H $_2$压力下,而使用1 kV的偏置电压至少可有效缓解至10 Pa。相关电场/磁场布置的结果补充了这一分析,并解决了SBWG缓解概念的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kinetic simulation of electron cyclotron resonance assisted gas breakdown in split-biased waveguides for ITER collective Thomson scattering diagnostic Topological phases, topological phase transition, and bulk-edge correspondence of magnetized cold plasmas Non-Maxwellianity of electron distributions near Earth's magnetopause Theory of Plasma-Cascade Instability Ion cyclotron parametric turbulence and anomalous convective transport of the inhomogeneous plasma in front of the fast wave antenna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1