Abstract GS6-04: Development and validation of a chemotherapy toxicity (Chemo Tox) risk score for older patients (Pts) with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment (Adjuvant Tx): A R01 and BCRF funded prospective multicenter study

A. Hurria, A. Magnuson, C. Gross, W. Tew, H. Klepin, T. Wildes, H. Muss, E. Dotan, R. Freedman, T. O'Connor, W. Dale, H. Cohen, V. Katheria, Anait Arsenyan, Abrahm Levi, Heeyoung Kim, C-L Sun
{"title":"Abstract GS6-04: Development and validation of a chemotherapy toxicity (Chemo Tox) risk score for older patients (Pts) with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment (Adjuvant Tx): A R01 and BCRF funded prospective multicenter study","authors":"A. Hurria, A. Magnuson, C. Gross, W. Tew, H. Klepin, T. Wildes, H. Muss, E. Dotan, R. Freedman, T. O'Connor, W. Dale, H. Cohen, V. Katheria, Anait Arsenyan, Abrahm Levi, Heeyoung Kim, C-L Sun","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS6-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Older pts with BC receiving adjuvant tx are at increased risk of chemo tox; however, no BC-specific tool exists to quantify this risk. The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) developed/validated a chemo tox score for older pts with all stages of solid tumor. The goals of this study were to: 1) build upon the CARG score by developing/validating CARG-BC (a BC specific adjuvant chemo tox score for older pts) and 2) evaluate its association with dose modifications, reduced relative dose intensity (RDI) and hospitalizations. Methods: 501 pts age ≥65 with stage I-III BC from 16 sites were accrued (300 development; 201 validation cohort). A pre-chemo assessment captured: CARG chemo tox score, BC tumor/tx variables, and additional geriatric assessment (GA) items. Grade 3-5 chemo tox by NCI CTCAE v 4.0 was captured. Univariate analysis identified chemo tox risk factors (p Results: Among 501 pts, 28 received non-standard regimens and were excluded, leaving 473 evaluable pts: 283 development and 190 validation cohort. The development cohort (median age 70; range 65-85) had Stage I (39%), II (41%), & III (20%) BC with 65% hormone positive, 24% triple negative, 27% Her2 positive; and 37% received an anthracycline. Grade 3-5 tox occurred in 46% (36% grade 3, 10% grade 4, 0.4% grade 5). The CARG score was significantly associated with grade 3-5 tox (p Conclusions: We developed and validated a risk score (CARG-BC) which identifies an older pt9s risk for adjuvant BC chemo tox and is associated with dose reduction, delay, reduced RDI, and hospitalization. This tool could be considered as a part of adjuvant tx decision-making. Citation Format: Hurria A, Magnuson A, Gross CP, Tew WP, Klepin HD, Wildes TM, Muss HB, Dotan E, Freedman R, O9Connor T, Dale W, Cohen HJ, Katheria V, Arsenyan A, Levi A, Kim H, Sun C-L. Development and validation of a chemotherapy toxicity (Chemo Tox) risk score for older patients (Pts) with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment (Adjuvant Tx): A R01 and BCRF funded prospective multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-04.","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS6-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Older pts with BC receiving adjuvant tx are at increased risk of chemo tox; however, no BC-specific tool exists to quantify this risk. The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) developed/validated a chemo tox score for older pts with all stages of solid tumor. The goals of this study were to: 1) build upon the CARG score by developing/validating CARG-BC (a BC specific adjuvant chemo tox score for older pts) and 2) evaluate its association with dose modifications, reduced relative dose intensity (RDI) and hospitalizations. Methods: 501 pts age ≥65 with stage I-III BC from 16 sites were accrued (300 development; 201 validation cohort). A pre-chemo assessment captured: CARG chemo tox score, BC tumor/tx variables, and additional geriatric assessment (GA) items. Grade 3-5 chemo tox by NCI CTCAE v 4.0 was captured. Univariate analysis identified chemo tox risk factors (p Results: Among 501 pts, 28 received non-standard regimens and were excluded, leaving 473 evaluable pts: 283 development and 190 validation cohort. The development cohort (median age 70; range 65-85) had Stage I (39%), II (41%), & III (20%) BC with 65% hormone positive, 24% triple negative, 27% Her2 positive; and 37% received an anthracycline. Grade 3-5 tox occurred in 46% (36% grade 3, 10% grade 4, 0.4% grade 5). The CARG score was significantly associated with grade 3-5 tox (p Conclusions: We developed and validated a risk score (CARG-BC) which identifies an older pt9s risk for adjuvant BC chemo tox and is associated with dose reduction, delay, reduced RDI, and hospitalization. This tool could be considered as a part of adjuvant tx decision-making. Citation Format: Hurria A, Magnuson A, Gross CP, Tew WP, Klepin HD, Wildes TM, Muss HB, Dotan E, Freedman R, O9Connor T, Dale W, Cohen HJ, Katheria V, Arsenyan A, Levi A, Kim H, Sun C-L. Development and validation of a chemotherapy toxicity (Chemo Tox) risk score for older patients (Pts) with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment (Adjuvant Tx): A R01 and BCRF funded prospective multicenter study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-04.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GS6-04:接受辅助/新辅助治疗(佐剂Tx)的老年乳腺癌(BC)患者化疗毒性(Chemo Tox)风险评分的开发和验证:一项R01和BCRF资助的前瞻性多中心研究
背景:接受辅助治疗的老年BC患者化疗毒性风险增加;然而,没有bc特有的工具来量化这种风险。癌症和衰老研究小组(CARG)开发/验证了针对所有阶段实体瘤的老年患者的化疗毒性评分。本研究的目的是:1)通过开发/验证CARG-BC(老年患者的BC特异性辅助化疗毒性评分)来建立CARG评分,2)评估其与剂量调整、降低相对剂量强度(RDI)和住院治疗的关系。方法:来自16个部位的501例年龄≥65岁的I-III期BC患者(300例发展;2011年验证队列)。化疗前评估包括:CARG化疗毒性评分、BC肿瘤/tx变量和额外的老年评估(GA)项目。NCI CTCAE v 4.0捕获3-5级化学毒物。结果:在501名患者中,28名患者接受了非标准方案,并被排除在外,剩下473名可评估患者:283名发展和190名验证队列。发展组(中位年龄70岁;范围65-85)有I期(39%),II期(41%)和III期(20%)BC, 65%激素阳性,24%三阴性,27% Her2阳性;37%的人接受了蒽环类药物。3-5级毒性发生率为46%(36%为3级,10%为4级,0.4%为5级)。CARG评分与3-5级毒性显著相关(p)。结论:我们开发并验证了一种风险评分(CARG-BC),该评分可识别老年pt9s发生辅助BC化疗毒性的风险,并与剂量减少、延迟、RDI降低和住院有关。该工具可被视为辅助tx决策的一部分。引文格式:Hurria A, Magnuson A, Gross CP, Tew WP, Klepin HD, Wildes TM, Muss HB, Dotan E, Freedman R, O9Connor T, Dale W, Cohen HJ, Katheria V, Arsenyan A, Levi A, Kim H, Sun C-L。接受辅助/新辅助治疗(佐剂Tx)的老年乳腺癌患者化疗毒性(Chemo Tox)风险评分的开发和验证:一项R01和BCRF资助的前瞻性多中心研究[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS6-04。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract GS4-02: E2112: Randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group Abstract GS3-07: Identifying patients whose symptoms are under-recognized during breast radiotherapy: Comparison of patient and physician reports of toxicity in a multicenter cohort Abstract GS2-03: Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients Abstract GS5-01: A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab Abstract GS4-02: Regional lymph node irradiation in early stage breast cancer: An EBCTCG meta-analysis of 13,000 women in 14 trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1