Design Beku: Toward Decolonizing Design and Technology through Collaborative and Situated Care-in-Practices

Padmini Ray Murray, Naveen Bagalkot, S. Srivatsa, P. Anthony
{"title":"Design Beku: Toward Decolonizing Design and Technology through Collaborative and Situated Care-in-Practices","authors":"Padmini Ray Murray, Naveen Bagalkot, S. Srivatsa, P. Anthony","doi":"10.1525/gp.2021.26132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly there is a design impulse to “solve” problems for communities in India, especially through technological imaginations and interventions imported from elsewhere that are often irrelevant and unsuited to their context. As public goods, such as education, heritage, health care, and the like, in India shift from ideals of social equity to profit-making, designers engaged in “development” face an important question about their role in the change-making process, with ethical and political implications.\n In response to this question, we describe our efforts as a newly formed collective, Design Beku, which emerged from our desire to explore if and how technology and design can be decolonial, local, and ethical. Informed by cross-disciplinary theoretical and methodological underpinnings, we present a series of autoethnographic accounts by the collective’s founding members, woven together to describe our experiences, influences, learnings, and reflections on the life of the collective so far. Through articulating the commonalities and differences across our projects, we highlight how co-design becomes for us a care-in-practice, an onto-epistemology enabling us to align with local matters of concern to collaboratively evolve systemic solutions, enabled by but not led by technology. We believe the most powerful critique and challenge to the fascism of corporate and politically motivated technological regimes is by responding through community-centric design practice. We hope that our experiences and reflections will find resonance with other practitioners working within the larger context of the themes articulated by the call for this special issue.","PeriodicalId":91118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health perspectives","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.26132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Increasingly there is a design impulse to “solve” problems for communities in India, especially through technological imaginations and interventions imported from elsewhere that are often irrelevant and unsuited to their context. As public goods, such as education, heritage, health care, and the like, in India shift from ideals of social equity to profit-making, designers engaged in “development” face an important question about their role in the change-making process, with ethical and political implications. In response to this question, we describe our efforts as a newly formed collective, Design Beku, which emerged from our desire to explore if and how technology and design can be decolonial, local, and ethical. Informed by cross-disciplinary theoretical and methodological underpinnings, we present a series of autoethnographic accounts by the collective’s founding members, woven together to describe our experiences, influences, learnings, and reflections on the life of the collective so far. Through articulating the commonalities and differences across our projects, we highlight how co-design becomes for us a care-in-practice, an onto-epistemology enabling us to align with local matters of concern to collaboratively evolve systemic solutions, enabled by but not led by technology. We believe the most powerful critique and challenge to the fascism of corporate and politically motivated technological regimes is by responding through community-centric design practice. We hope that our experiences and reflections will find resonance with other practitioners working within the larger context of the themes articulated by the call for this special issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计Beku:通过协作和定位护理实践走向非殖民化设计和技术
越来越多的设计冲动为印度的社区“解决”问题,特别是通过从其他地方引进的技术想象和干预,这些往往是不相关的,不适合他们的环境。随着教育、遗产、医疗保健等公共产品在印度从社会公平的理想转向盈利,从事“发展”的设计师面临着一个重要的问题,即他们在变革过程中的角色,以及道德和政治方面的影响。为了回答这个问题,我们将我们的努力描述为一个新成立的集体,设计Beku,这源于我们探索技术和设计是否以及如何能够非殖民化,本地化和道德化的愿望。在跨学科的理论和方法基础上,我们呈现了一系列集体创始成员的自我民族志叙述,这些叙述交织在一起,描述了我们迄今为止对集体生活的经历、影响、学习和反思。通过阐明我们项目之间的共性和差异,我们强调共同设计如何成为我们的实践关怀,一种本体-认识论,使我们能够与当地关注的问题保持一致,共同发展系统解决方案,这是由技术实现的,但不是由技术主导的。我们认为,对企业法西斯主义和政治驱动的技术制度最有力的批评和挑战是通过以社区为中心的设计实践来应对。我们希望我们的经验和思考能与其他从业者在本期特刊呼吁所阐述的主题的更大背景下工作时产生共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century Rethinking Multilateralism and Global Development A Home Away from Home: The Halfway-Return of Western-Trained Asian Scientists Democracy for the Few Democratic Nostalgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1